Little attention has been given to better understanding how to effectively evaluate the work of instructional coaches. This study by Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides and Sarah Theule Lubienski illustrates how a new evaluation system for coaches was implemented in one mid-size, urban district. They describe two ways in which the Evaluation Tool detracted from the coaches’ work to foster teacher improvement. Furthermore, they provide suggestions for school districts to consider when evaluating their coaches.
BerlinerD.C. (2018). Between Scylla and Charybdis: Reflections on and problems associated with the evaluation of teachers in an era of metrification. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26 (54).
2.
ClarkeA.TriggsV.NielsenW. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84 (2), 163–202.
CobbP.JacksonK.HenrickE.SmithT.M. (2018). Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
KillionJ.HarrisonC. (2006). Taking the lead: New roles for teachers and school-based coaches. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
7.
KowalJ.SteinerL. (2007). Instructional coaching (Issue Brief). Washington, DC: Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.
8.
SaclaridesE.S.LubienskiS.T. (2018a). Exploring the content and depth of coach-teacher talk during modeling and co-teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
9.
SaclaridesE.S.LubienskiS.T. (2018b). Tensions in teacher choice and professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 100 (3), 55–58.
10.
SaclaridesE.S.LubienskiS. (2018c). Where’s the math? A study of coach-teacher talk during modeling and co-teaching. In HodgesT.E.RoyG.J.TyminskiA.M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 334–341). Greenville, SC: University of South Carolina & Clemson University.
11.
SaclaridesE.S.LubienskiS.T. (in press). The influence of administrative policies and expectations on coach-teacher interactions. The Elementary School Journal.
