Opinions about whether comments, grades, or both are the most effective forms of feedback vary widely among teachers, school leaders, and even grading and assessment consultants. Thomas Guskey maintains that the truth is not as clear-cut as some suggest. He reviews the research, going back to the 1950s, to better understand when certain types of feedback are most useful. He concludes that grades and comments are not, in and of themselves, beneficial to student learning. Effective feedback, whether in the form of grades or comments, must give students a sense of where they are and what they need to do to improve.
BloomB.S. (1971). Mastery learning. In BlockJ.H. (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6.
BloomB.S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7.
BloomB.S.HastingsJ.T.MadausG.F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
8.
BloomB.S.MadausG.F.HastingsJ.T. (1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9.
BrookhartS.M.NitkoA.J. (2008). Assessment and grading in classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
10.
Brumage-KilcourseE. (2017, December1). Opposition to 80/20 grading system not waning amongst parents, students. Bear Facts.
11.
ButlerR. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58 (1), 1–14.
12.
ChappuisJ.StigginsR.J. (2017). An introduction to student involved assessment for learning (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
13.
GuskeyT.R. (2006). ”It wasn’t fair!” Educators’ recollections of their experiences as students with grading. Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 6 (2), 111–124.
14.
GuskeyT.R. (2008). The rest of the story. Educational Leadership, 65 (4), 28–35.
15.
GuskeyT.R.BrookhartS.M. (2019). What we know about grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
16.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
HattieJ.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112.
18.
KingstonN.NashB. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30 (4), 28–37.
19.
KohnA. (1994). Grading: The issue is not how but why. Educational Leadership, 52 (2), 38–41.
20.
KohnA. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, and other bribes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
PageE.B. (1958). Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49 (2), 173–181.
22.
SpencerK. (2017, August11). A new kind of classroom: No grades, no failing, no hurry. New York Times.
23.
StewartL.G.WhiteM.A. (1976). Teacher comments, letter grades and student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68 (4), 488–500.
24.
StoskopfM. (2016, November29). 80/20 disadvantages outweigh advantages. The Mirror.
25.
TrembathK. (2017, December1). Teachers react to 80/20 grading policy. The Mav.
