Peer review is integral to academic endeavour, but opportunities for students to benefit from peer review in higher education remain limited, and relatively little is known about how student perceptions influence their appreciation of peer review. University student perceptions were examined before and after experiencing student peer review in four university subjects differing in discipline, year level and class size. Prior to engaging in peer review, students had remarkably high expectations of both the process and the competence of their peers as reviewers. Students reported high satisfaction levels with the peer-review process and its positive impact on their learning, and particularly showed an enhanced appreciation of the influence of review writing on learning. However, a modest overall downward shift in positive perceptions was observed following peer review, suggesting that student opinions of peer review became somewhat more polarized as a consequence of their experiences. Drawing on survey response data and student comments, several recommendations are made that may help to improve student perceptions of peer review and ensure that the diverse learning benefits of the peer-review process are achieved.
BallantyneRHughesKMylonasA (2002) Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education27(5): 427–41.
2.
BiggsJTangC (2007) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Berkshire: Open University Press.
3.
BoudD (1990) Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education15(1): 101–11.
4.
BoudD (2000) Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education22(2): 151–67.
5.
BrindleyCScoffieldS (1998) Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education3(1): 79–90.
6.
CartneyP (2010) Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education35(5): 551–64.
7.
ChengK-HTsaiC-C (2012) Students’ interpersonal perspectives on, conceptions of and approaches to learning in online peer assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology28(4): 599–618.
8.
ChengWWarrenM (1997) Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education22(2): 233–9.
9.
ChoKMacArthurC (2010) Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction20(4): 328–38.
10.
ChoKSchunnCDWilsonRW (2006) Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology98(4): 891–901.
11.
DochyFSegersMSluijsmansD (1999) The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education24(3): 331–50.
12.
FalchikovN (2005) Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
13.
FallowsSChandramohanB (2001) Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education6(2): 229–46.
14.
GielenSDochyFOnghenaP. (2011) Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts. Studies in Higher Education36(6): 719–35.
15.
GielenSTopsLDochyF. (2010) A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal36(1): 143–62.
16.
HanrahanSJIsaacsG (2001) Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development20(1): 53–70.
17.
HansenJGLiuJ (2005) Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal: English Language Teachers Journal59(1): 31–8.
18.
HattieJTimperleyH (2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research77(1): 81–112.
19.
HounsellDMcCuneVHounsellJ. (2008) The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development27(1): 55–67.
20.
HowardCDNBarrettAFFrickTW (2010) Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research43(1): 89–112.
21.
KaufmanJSchunnC (2011) Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science39(3): 387–406.
22.
KrauseK-LHartleyRJamesR. (2005) The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, January2005.
23.
LiLLiuXSteckelbergAL (2010) Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology41(3): 525–36.
24.
LiuNFCarlessD (2006) Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education11(3): 279–90.
25.
LundstromKBakerW (2009) To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing18(1): 30–43.
26.
MeiTYuanQ (2010) A case study of peer feedback in a Chinese EFL writing classroom. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics33(4): 87–98.
27.
MooreCTeatherS (2013) Engaging students in peer review: Feedback as learning. In: Design, develop, evaluate: The core of the learning environment. Proceedings of the 22nd annual teaching learning forum, 7–8 February 2013. Murdoch University, Perth.
28.
MostertMSnowballJD (2012) Where angels fear to tread: Online peer-assessment in a large first-year class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education38(6): 674–686.
29.
MulderRAPearceJM (2007) PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review. In: ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education. Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2-5 December 2007. pp. 727–36.
30.
NicolDJMacfarlane-DickD (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education31(2): 199–218.
31.
NultyDD (2010) Peer and self-assessment in the first year of university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education36(5): 493–507.
32.
OrsmondPMerrySReilingK (2000) The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education25(1): 23–38.
33.
PaulusTM (1999) The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing8(3): 265–89.
34.
PearceJMulderRBaikC (2009) Involving Students in Peer Review: Case Studies and Practical Strategies for University Teaching. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
35.
RamsdenP (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
36.
RodriguezCM (2009) The impact of academic self-concept, expectations and the choice of learning strategy on academic achievement: The case of business students. Higher Education Research & Development28(5): 523–39.
37.
RubinRS (2006) The academic journal review process as a framework for student developmental peer feedback. Journal of Management Education30(2): 378–98.
38.
RustCPriceMO’DonovanB (2003) Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education28(2): 147–64.
39.
ShuteVJ (2008) Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research78(1): 153–89.
40.
SluijsmansD (2002) Establishing learning effects with integrated peer assessment tasks. The Higher Education Academy. Available at: http://78.158.56.101/archive/palatine/files/930.pdf (accessed 5 July 2009).
41.
SomervellH (1993) Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education18(3): 221–33.
42.
TarasM (2006) Do unto others or not: Equity in feedback for undergraduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education31(3): 365–77.
43.
ToppingK (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research68(3): 249–76.
44.
ToppingKJSmithEFSwansonI. (2000) Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education25(2): 149–69.
45.
Van Den BergIAdmiraalWPilotA (2006) Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education31(3): 341–56.
46.
VickermanP (2009) Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education34(2): 221–30.
