This study investigated the influence of sonar training and experience on the selective attention of experienced and inexperienced operators. The Stroop task was selected as a measure of general selective attention, similar in certain task requirements (attentional allocation) to sonar operation. Across two samples (ns = 32 and 36) and four repeated test sessions groups did not differ significantly in speed or accuracy of Stroop performance. The data suggest that experienced operators do not seem to have developed extraordinary attentional skills and that any attentional skills developed through sonar experience do not generalize to other tasks such as the Stroop.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BedardJ., & ChiT. H. (1992) Expertise.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 135–139.
2.
ComalliP., WapnerS., and WernerH. (1962) Interference effects of Stroop Color-Word Test in childhood, adulthood, and aging.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100, 47–52.
3.
DyerF. (1973) The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.Memory & Cognition, 1, 106–120.
4.
GlaserR. (1986) On the nature of expertise. In KlixF., & HagendorfH. (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive abilities.New York: Elsevier Science. Pp. 915–928.
5.
HarbesonM., KrauseM., KennedyR., and BittnerA. (1982) The Stroop as a performance evaluation test for environmental research.The Journal of Psychology, 111, 223–233.
6.
JensenA. R. (1965) Scoring the Stroop test.Acta Psychologica, 24, 398–408.
7.
JensenA. R., and RohwerW. (1966) The Stroop Color-Word Test: a review.Acta Psychologica, 25, 36–93.
8.
KobusD., BeelerM., and StashowerK. (1987) Electrophysiological effects of experience during an auditory task. NHRC Technical Report 87-2, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
9.
KobusD., and LewandowskiL. (1992) Critical factors in sonar operation: a survey of experienced operators. NHRC Technical Report 92–30, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
10.
KobusD., LewandowskiL., and FloodM. (1987) Cognitive and personality characteristics of experienced sonar operators. NHRC Technical Report 87-15, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
11.
KobusD., and StashowerK. (1988) A further investigation of experience and task difficulty on the event-related potential. NHRC Technical Report 88-30, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
12.
LewandowskiL., KobusD., FloodM., and HoyerW. (1988) The effects of age and experience on sonar performance.Technical Report 88-29,Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
13.
MerrillL. (1990) The effect of sonar experience on the event-related brain potential. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
14.
ReisbergD., BaronJ., and KemlerD. (1980) Overcoming Stroop interference: the effects of practice on distractor potency.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 6, 140–150.
15.
SchneiderW., and ShiffrinR. (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
16.
SpielbergerC. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17.
StroopR. (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
18.
WechslerD. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised.New York: Psychological Corp.
