15 highly aroused snake phobics individually constructed fear hierarchies by selecting colored photographs of snakes. Subjects either imagined fear scenes based on their photographs or were exposed to duplicate projected slides during desensitization. Pupillary responses of the Slide Group were also recorded before, during, and after desensitization. Fear of snakes was significantly reduced for both groups within five or fewer desensitization sessions. Changes in pupil size of the Slide Group appear to reflect arousal of fear as well as reduction of fear after treatment. Current technology makes pupillary response a viable psychophysiological measure of fear.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtwoodR. W., & HowellR. J.Pupillometric and personality test score differences of pedophiliacs and normals.Psychonomic Science, 1971, 22, 115–116.
2.
BernickN., KlingA., & BorowithG.Physiologic differentiation of sexual arousal and anxiety.Psychosomatic Medicine, 1971, 33, 341–352.
3.
BernsteinF. S., & PaulG. L.Some comments on therapy analogue research with small animal “phobias.”Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1971, 2, 225–237.
4.
BorkovecT. D., & O'BrienG. T.Methodological and target behavior issues in analogue therapy outcome research. In HersenM., EislerR. M., & MillerP. M. (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1976. Pp. 133–172.
5.
DenholtzM. S., & MannE. T.An audiovisual program for group desensitization.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1974, 5, 27–29. (a)
6.
DenholtzM. S., & MannE. T.An automated audiovisual treatment of phobias administered by non-professionals.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1974, 6, 111–115. (b)
7.
GeerJ. H.Fear and autonomic arousal.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966, 71, 253–255.
8.
GoldbergJ., & D'ZurillaT. J.Demonstration of slide projection as an alternative to imaginal stimulus presentation in systematic desensitization therapy.Psychological Reports, 1968, 23, 527–533.
9.
GoldwaterB. C.Psychological significance of pupillary movements.Psychological Bulletin, 77, 340–355.
10.
Gomes-SchwartzB., HadleyW., & StruppH. H.Individual psychotherapy and behavior therapy.Annual Review of Psychology, 1978, 29, 435–471.
11.
HessE. H.The tell-tale eye.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1975.
12.
HessE. H., & PoltJ. M.Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli.Science, 1960, 132, 349–350.
13.
HessE. H., & PoltJ. M.Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving.Science, 1964, 143, 1190–1192.
14.
HessE. H., RhoadesB. K., HodgesA. W., & AbbottE. S.Jr.An inexpensive, non-dedicated, automated pupillometric measurement system.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982, 54, 235–241.
15.
HessE. H., SeltzerA. L., & ShlienJ. M.Pupil response of hetero- and homosexual males to pictures of men and women: a pilot study.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965, 70, 165–168.
16.
HymanE. T., & GaleE. N.Galvanic skin response and reported anxiety during systematic desensitization.Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 108–114.
17.
KazdinA. E., & WilcoxonL. A.Systematic desensitization and nonspecific treatment effects: a methodological evaluation.Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 729–758.
18.
KennedyO.Pupillometrics as an aid in the assessment of motivation, impact of treatment and prognosis of chronic alcoholics.Dissertation Abstracts International, 1971, 322, 1241B–1251B.
19.
LangP. J., & LazovikA. D.Experimental desensitization of a phobia.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 519–525.
20.
LangP. J., LazovikA. D., & ReynoldsD. J.Desensitization, suggestibility and pseudo-therapy.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965, 70, 395–402.
21.
LangP. J., MelamedB., & HartJ.A psychophysiological analysis of fear modification using an automated desensitization procedure.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1970, 76, 220–234.
22.
LickJ. R., & KatkinE. S.Assessment of anxiety and fear. In HersenM., & BellackA. S. (Eds.), Behavioral assessment.New York: Pergamon, 1976. Pp. 175–206.
23.
MathewsA. M.Psychophysiological approaches to the investigation of desensitization and related procedures.Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 76, 73–91.
24.
McGlynnF. D., BichajianC., GiesenJ. M., RullanC. M., & PulverL.Factorial study of component procedures in desensitization treatment of test anxiety among college students.Psychological Reports, 1981, 49, 351–362.
25.
McGlynnF. D., & McClarenH. A.Components of desensitization in modification of fear among genuinely fearful subjects.Psychological Reports, 1975, 37, 959–969.
26.
McGlynnF. D., MealieaW. L.Jr., & LandauD. L.The current status of systematic desensitization.Clinical Psychology Review, 1981, 1, 149–179.
27.
McGlynnF. D., SolomonG. S.., & BarriosB. A.Graded imagination and relaxation as components of experimental desensitization: a psychophysiological evaluation.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1979, 35, 542–546.
28.
MetalisS. A., & HessE. H.Psychophysiological index attenuation to pictures.Physiological Psychology, 1981, 9, 235–243.
29.
NunnallyJ. C.Pupillary response in anticipation of emotion-provoking events. Paper presented at Pupil Symposium, APA convention, Washington, DC, 1967.
30.
NunnallyJ. C., KnottP. D., DochnowskiA., & ParkerR.Pupillary response as a general measure of activation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 149–155.
31.
PoltJ. M.Effect of threat of shock on pupillary response in a problem-solving situation.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 31, 587–593.
32.
SchubotE. D.The influence of hypnotic and muscular relaxation in systematic desensitization of phobias. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford Univer., 1966.
33.
SchwartzG. E.Psychobiological foundations of psychotherapy and behavior change. In GarfieldS. L., & BerginA. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley, 1978. Pp. 63–99.
34.
SimpsonH. M., & MolloyF. M.Effects of audience anxiety on pupil size.Psycho-physiology, 1971, 8, 491–496.
35.
SturgeonR. S.The effect of a color slide hierarchy of fear stimuli on the reduction of fear of snakes as measured by the pupillometric technique. (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young Univer., 1968) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1969, 29, 322A.
36.
WilsonG. D.An electrodermal technique for the study of phobias.New Zealand Medical Journal, 1966, 65, 696–698.
37.
WilsonG. D.GSR responses to fear-related stimuli.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 401–402.
38.
WinczeJ. P., & CairdW. K.The effects of systematic desensitization and video desensitization in the treatment of essential sexual dysfunction in women.Behavior Therapy, 1976, 7, 335–342.
39.
WolpeJ., & FloodJ.The effect of relaxation on the galvanic skin response to repeated phobic stimuli in ascending order.Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1970, 1, 195–200.
40.
WoodmanseeJ. J.Methodological problems in pupillographic experiments. Paper presented at APA meeting, New York, 1966.
