We affirm that there is no correlation between values of pleasantness-unpleasantness and emotionality; however, the level of pleasantness and of unpleasantness influence the intensity of emotionality. We presented four lists of-words (concrete-pleasant, concrete-unpleasant, abstract-pleasant, abstract-unpleasant) to 120 subjects who scored each word on two scales, pleasantness and emotionality. We obtained a correlation of .01 between the two variables; however, we found a positive correlation (.55) when we used pleasant words and a negative correlation (−.58) when wc used unpleasant words.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrownW. P., & UreD. M. J. (1969) Five rated characteristics of 650 word association stimuli.British Journal of Psychology, 60, 232–249.
2.
CamposA. (1989) Emotional values of words: relation with concreteness and vividness of imagery.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 495–498.
3.
CamposA. (1989) Pleasantness of words: relation with concreteness and imagery values when stimuli are controlled.Psychological Reports, 65, 367–370.
4.
CamposA., & AstorgaV. M.Valores de concreción y emotividad de palabras españMolas.Cognitiva, 2, 99–110.
5.
PaivioA. (1968) A factor-analytic study of word attributes and verbal learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 41–49.
6.
RubinD. C. (1980) 51 properties of 125 words: a unit analysis of verbal behavior.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 736–755.
7.
RubinD. C., & FriendlyM. (1986) Predicting which words get recalled: measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns.Memory and Cognition, 14, 79–94.
8.
Vikis-FreibergsV. (1976) Abstractness and emotionality values for 398 French words.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 30, 22–30.