Matching models are offered as a possible solution to some of the major methodological problems presented in the research on validation of graphology. Past studies based on matching procedures are briefly summarized. An improved variation of matching based on ranking is presented, together with a report on a study conducted by the author in which such a procedure was instituted. Analyses show that raters can match, with a probability higher than chance, persons known to them with graphological reports of those persons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ben-ShakharG., Bar-HillelM., BiluY., Ben-AbbaE., & FlugA. (1986) Can graphology predict occupational success: two empirical studies and some methodological ruminations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 645–653.
2.
CrumbaughJ. C., & StockholmE. (1977) Validation of graphoanalysis by global or holistic method.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 403–410.
3.
EysenckH. J. (1945) Graphological analysis and psychiatry: an experimental study.British Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 10–81.
4.
FluckigerF. A., TrippC. A., & WeinbergG. H. (1961) A review of experimental research in graphology, 1933–1960.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 12, 67–90.
5.
GillettR. (1985) The matching paradigm: an exact test procedure.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 106–118.
6.
GuttmanL. (1941) An outline of the statistical theory of prediction. In HorstP. (Ed.), The prediction of personal adjustment.New York: Social Science Research Council.
7.
HaleviH. (1965) An alternative approach to the method of correct matching.Psychometrica, 30, 67–90.
8.
HartfordH. (1973) You are what you write.New York: Collier Books.
9.
LockowandtO. (1976) Present status of the investigation of handwriting psychology as a diagnostic method.Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 4–5.
10.
MichelL. (1969) Empirische Untersuchungen zur Fragen der Übereinstimmung und Gültigkeit von Verurteilungen des Intellektuellen Nieveaus aus der Handschrift.Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie, 121, 31–54.
11.
NevoB. (1988) Yes, graphology can predict occupational success: rejoinder to Ben-Shakhar, et al.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 92–94.
12.
PowersE. (1933) Matching sketches of personality with script. In AllportG. W., & VernonP. E. (Eds.), Studies in expressive movement.New York: Hafner. Chap. 10.
13.
RaphaeliA., & KlimoskiR. J. (1983) Predicting sales success through handwriting analysis: an evaluation of effects of training and handwriting sample content.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 211–217.
14.
WallnerT. (1965) Graphologie als Objekt statistischer Untersuchungen.Psychologische Rundschau, 16, 282–298.
15.
WallnerT (1975) Hypotheses of handwriting psychology and their verification.Professional Psychology, 6, 8–16.
