26 five-point statements are used to examine perceptual differences among beliefs and behaviors in five primary ethical situations for 323 undergraduate communication students in two mid-Atlantic public universities. Analyses indicate significant differences among means over the five situations. Also, there are significant agreements among ranks for the students’, professors’, and peers’ beliefs, as perceived by the students, and between the self-reported behaviors of the students and their perceptions of the behaviors of their peers. Factor analysis establishes the basic structure of these five ethical situations in a two-dimensional space.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntionD. L., & MichaelW. B. (1983) Short-term predictive validity of demographic, affective, personal, and cognitive variables in relation to two criterion measures of cheating behaviors.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 467–482.
2.
BaumrindD. (1986) Sex differences in moral judgment: critique of Walker's conclusion that there are none.Child Development, 57, 511–521.
3.
BrabeckM. (1983) Moral judgment: theory and research on differences between males and females.Developmental Review, 3, 274–291.
4.
BrownleeB. J. (1987) Coping with plagiarism requires several strategies.Journalism Educator, 41(4), 25–29.
5.
Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education. (1979) Fair practices in higher education.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
DagherS. P., & SpaderP. H. (1980) Poll of top managers stresses education and leadership-by-example as strong forces for higher standards.Management Review, 69 (March), 54–57.
7.
FassR. A. (1986) By honor bound: encouraging academic honesty.Educational Record, 67(4), 32–35.
8.
FriedmanW. J., RobinsonA. B., & FriedmanB. L. (1987) Sex differences in moral judgments? A test of Gilligan's theory.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 37–46.
9.
GibbsJ. C., ArnoldK. D., & BurkhartJ. E. (1984) Sex differences in the expression of moral judgment.Child Development, 55, 1040–1043.
10.
GilliganC. (1977) In a different voice: women's conceptions of self and of morality.Harvard Educational Review, 47, 481–517.
11.
GilliganC. (1982) In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
12.
HainesV. J., DiekhoffG. M., LaBeffE. E., & ClarkR. E. (1986) College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude.Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354.
13.
HalfJ. L. (1987) Plagiarism in classroom settings.Communication Research Reports, 4(12), 66–70.
14.
HarpJ., & TaietzP. (1966) Academic integrity and social structure: a study of cheating among college students.Social Problems, 13 (Spring), 365–373.
15.
HartshorneH., & MayM. A. (1928) Studies in deceit.New York: Macmillan.
16.
HawkinsD. I., & CocanougherA. B. (1972) Student evaluations of the ethics of marketing practices: the role of marketing education.Journal of Marketing, 36 (April), 61–64.
17.
HawleyC. S. (1984) The thieves of academe: plagiarism in the university system.Improving College & University Teaching, 32 (Winter), 35–39.
18.
HetheringtonE. M., & FeldmanS. E. (1964) College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables.Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 212–218.
19.
KarlinsM., & HargisE. (1988) Inaccurate self-perception as a limiting factor in managerial effectiveness.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 665–666.
20.
KarlinsM., MichaelsC., & PodlogarS. (1988) An empirical investigation of actual cheating in a large sample of undergraduates.Research in Higher Education, 29, 359–364.
21.
KellyJ. A., & WorellL. (1978) Personality characteristics, parent behaviors, and sex of subject in relation to cheating.Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 179–188.
22.
KurreJ. A., & TauberR. T. (1987) An alternative to multiple exam versions for deterring cheating.Journal of Education for Business, 62, 297–299.
23.
LemingJ. S. (1980) Cheating behavior, subject variables, and components of the internal-external scale under high and low risk conditions.The Journal of Educational Research, 74, 83–87.
24.
LeVineR. A. (1966) American college experience as a socialization process. In NewcombT. M., & WilsonE. K. (Eds.), College peer groups: problems and prospects for research.Chicago, IL: Aldine. Pp. 107–132.
25.
LyonsN. (1983) Two perspectives: on self, relationships, and morality.Harvard Educational Review, 53, 125–145.
26.
ManoD. K. (1987) The cheating industry.National Review, June. Pp. 50, 52–53.
27.
McSherryM. (1988) 40 percent of students polled admit cheating.U. The National College Newspaper, 1 (February), 1, 6.
28.
MillerG. (1988) Curbing student dishonesty.The Education Digest, April, 42–45.
29.
NelsonT. D., & SchaeferN. (1986) Cheating among college students estimated with the randomized-response technique.The College Student Journal, 20, 321–325.
30.
NewcombT. M. (1943) Personality and social change: attitude formation in a student community.New York: Holt, Rinchart & Winston.
31.
NewcombT. M. (1966) The general nature of peer group influence. In NewcombT. M., & WilsonE. K. (Eds.), College peer groups: problems and prospects for research.Chicago IL: Aldine. Pp. 2–16.
32.
NewstromJ. W., & RuchW. A. (1976) The ethics of business students: preparation for a career.AACSB Bulletin, 12 (April), 21–29.
33.
NucciL., & PascarellaE. T. (1987) The influence of college on moral development. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: handbook of theory and research. Vol. IIINew York: Agathon. Pp. 271–326.
34.
OaksH. R. (1975) Cheating attitudes and practices at two state colleges.Improving College and University Teaching, 23, 232–235.
35.
PrattC. B., & McLaughlinG. W. (1989) An analysis of predictors of college students’ ethical inclinations.Research in Higher Education, 30, 195–219.
36.
PrattM. W., GoldingG., & HunterW. (1984) Does morality have a gender?: sex, sex role, and moral judgment relationships across the adult life span.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, 321–340.
37.
PrattM. W., GoldingG., HunterW., & NorrisJ. (1988) From inquiry to judgment: age and sex differences in patterns of adult moral thinking and information-seeking.International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 27, 115–130.
38.
PrattM. W., GoldingG., HunterW., & SampsonR. (1988) Sex differences in adult moral orientations.Journal of Personality, 56, 373–391.
39.
RothbartM., HanleyD., & AlbertM. (1986) Gender differences in moral reasoning.Sex Roles, 15, 645–653.
40.
ScheersN. J., & DaytonC. M. (1987) Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique.Research in Higher Education, 26(1), 61–69.
41.
ScheffeH. (1953) A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance.Biometrika, 40, 87–104.
42.
SherifM., & HovlandC. I. (1961) Social judgement.New Haven, CT: Yale Univer. Press.
43.
SherrillD., SalisburyJ. L., HorowitzB., & FriedmanS. T. (1971) Classroom cheating: consistent attitude, perceptions, and behavior.American Educational Research Journal, 8, 503–510.
44.
ShupstrineF. K. (1979) Evaluating the ethics of marketing practices: student perceptions. In BeckwithN., HoustonM., MittelstaedtR., MonroeK. B., & WardS. (Eds.), American Marketing Association: 1979 Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Series No. 44. Pp. 124–127.
45.
SierlesF., HendrickI., & CircleS. (1980) Cheating in medical school.Journal of Medical Education, 55, 124–125.
46.
SinghalA. C. (1982) Factors in students’ dishonesty.Psychological Reports, 51, 775–780.
47.
SmetanaJ. (1984) Does morality have a gender?: a comment on Pratt, Golding and Hunter.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, 341–347.
48.
SmithC. P., RyanE. R., & DigginsD. R. (1972) Moral decision making: cheating on examinations.Journal of Personality, 40, 640–660.
49.
StevensG. E., & RichardsonW. D. (1988) Values in action in the classroom: students’ perceptions of what constitutes cheating behaviors. Paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Southwestern Federation of Administrative Disciplines, The Academy of Management, San Antonio, TX.
50.
StevensG. E., & StevensF. W. (1987) Ethical inclinations of tomorrow's managers revisited: how and why students cheat.Journal of Education for Business, 63, 24–29.
51.
ThomaS. J. (1986) Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preferences of moral issues.Developmental Review, 6, 165–180.
52.
TillmanD. (1989) Nationwide study reveals more freshmen cheating.U. The National College Newspaper, 3 (October), 1.
53.
TomG., & BorinN. (1988) Cheating in academe.Journal of Education for Business63, 153–157.
54.
WalkerL. J. (1984) Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: a critical review.Child Development, 55, 677–691.
55.
WalkerL. J. (1986) Experiential and cognitive sources of moral development in adult-hood.Human Development, 29, 113–121.
56.
WalkerL. J. (1986) Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: a rejoinder to Baumrind.Child Development, 57, 522–526.
57.
WalkerL. J., DeVriesB., & TrevethanS. (1987) Moral stages and moral orientations.Child Development, 58, 842–858.
58.
WokutchR. E., & FaheyL. (1981) Methodological issues in business ethics. Paper presented at the Symposium on Research in Business Ethics, 41st Annual Meeting of The Academy of Management, San Diego, CA.
59.
WrightJ. C., & KellyR. (1974) Cheating: student/faculty views and responsibilities.Improving College and University Teaching, 22(1), 31, 34.
