A modified version of ambivalence-amplification hypothesis was applied to a situation involving possible sex discrimination. The modified hypothesis stated that people would have a more polarized reaction to the positive and negative behaviors of an opposite-sex individual than to a same-sex individual. Male and female subjects saw four videotaped segments in which a judge made some comments toward a defendant. The four segments showed male and female judges making positive or negative comments. Subjects rated their liking for the judge after each segment. Results were consistent with the polarization hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CostrichN., FeinsteinJ., KidderL., MarecekJ., & PascaleL. (1975) When stereotypes hurt: three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 520–530.
2.
KatzI. (1981) Stigma: a social psychological analysis.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
KatzI., WachenhutJ., & GlassD. C. (1979) An ambivalence-amplification theory of behavior toward the stigmatized. In AustinW., & WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Pp. 103–117.
