Eight articulatory disordered children were studied to compare the occurrence of phonological processes using three elicitation methods, including single-word productions, imitated sentences, and continuous speech sampling. A total of 11 phonological processes were shown by the subjects, with only the process of gliding indicative of significantly different rates of occurrence among the three procedures. These subjects were relatively consistent in their use of phonological processes under different speaking conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsN., & FeyM. E. (1986) Analysis of the speech of phonologically impaired children in two conditions.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 3, 187–198.
2.
BanksonN. W., & BernthalJ. E. (1981) Assessment of articulation. In LassN., NorthernJ., YoderD., & McReynoldsL. (Eds.), Speech, language, and hearing.Philadelphia, PA: Saunders. Pp. 572–290.
3.
BanksonN. W., & BernthalJ. E. (1982) A comparison of phonological processes identified through word and sentence imitation tasks of the PPA.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 13, 96–99.
4.
BenjaminB. J., & GreenwoodJ. L. (1983) A comparison of three phonological assessment procedures.Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 1, 19–27.
5.
BernthalJ. E., & BanksonN. W. (1988) Articulation and phonological disorders. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
CarterE., & BuckM. (1958) Prognostic testing for functional articulation disorders among children in the first grade.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 23, 124–133.
7.
ComptonA. J. (1970) Generative studies of children's phonological disorders.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 35, 315–339.
DuboisE. M., & BernthalJ. E. (1978) A comparison of three methods for obtaining articulator)’ responses.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 295–305.
10.
DysonA., & RobinsonT. (1987) The effect of phonological analysis procedure on the selection of potential remediation targets.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 18, 364–377.
11.
EdwardsM. L. (1983) Issues in phonological assessmentSeminars in Speech and Language, 4, 351–374.
12.
FairclothM. A., & FairclothS. R. (1970) An analysis of the articulatory behavior of a speech-defective child in connected speech and in isolated-word responses.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 35, 51–61.
13.
HaynesW. O., & SteadS. F. (1987) Multiphonemic scoring of articulation in imitative sentences: some preliminary data.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 18, 4–14.
14.
HodsonB. W. (1980) The assessment of phonological processes, Danville, IL: Interstate.
IngramD. (1976) Phonological disability in children.New York: American Elsevier.
17.
JohnsonJ., WinneyB., & PedersonO. (1980) Single word versus connected speech articulation testing.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 11, 175–179.
18.
KleinH. B. (1984) Procedures for maximizing phonological information from single-word responses.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 15, 267–274.
19.
KresheckJ., & SocolofskyG. (1972) Imitative and spontaneous articulatory assessment of four-year-old children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 729–733.
20.
LoweR. (1986) Assessment link between phonology and articulation.Moline, IL: Lingui-Systems.
21.
McReynoldsL., & ElbertM. L. (1981) Criteria for phonological analysis.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 197–204.
OllerD. K. (1983) Regularities in abnormal child phonology.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 36–47.
24.
PadenE. P., & MossS. A. (1985) Comparison of three phonological analysis procedures.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 16, 103–109.
25.
PaynterE., & BumpasT. (1977) Imitative and spontaneous articulatory assessment of three-year-old children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 119–125.
26.
ShribergL. D., & KwiatkowskiJ. (1980) Natural process analysis.New York: Wiley.
27.
ShribergL. D., & KwiatkowskiJ. (1982) Phonological disorders: III. A procedure for assessing severity of involvement.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 256–270.
28.
SiegelR., WinnitzH., & ConkeyH. (1963) The influence of testing instruments on articulatory responses in children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 28, 67–76.
29.
SmithM., & AinsworthS. (1967) The effects of three types of stimulation on articulatory responses on speech defective children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 333–338.
30.
StampeD. (1969) The acquisition of phonetic representation. Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, 433–444.
31.
TemplinM. (1947) Spontaneous vs. imitated verbalizations in testing preschool children.journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 12, 293–300.
32.
WeinerF. (1979) Phonological process analysis.Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
