Signal-detection models of recognition memory assume that S's decision as to whether or not he recognizes a stimulus is a function of a criterion value. In selecting his criterion, S takes into consideration the a priori probability of an old item and the costs and rewards of a hit or false alarm. In the present experiment, Ss were given feedback during recognition testing in an effort to determine whether it would aid S in selecting his criterion. The results showed that the feedback improved recognition performance by significantly reducing the number of false alarm errors. Evidence was presented to support the claim that S's criterion was affected by this manipulation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernbackH. A.Decision processes in memory. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 462–480.
2.
DonaldsonW., & MurdockB. C.Criterion changes in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 76, 325–329.
3.
KintschW.Memory and decision aspects of recognition learning. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 496–504.
4.
LukaszewskiJ. S., & ElliottO. N.Auditory threshold as a function of forced choice techniques, feedback and motivation. Journal of the Acoustical Society, 1962, 34, 223–228.
5.
NobleC. E.Measurement of association value (a), rated associations (a'), and scaled meaningfulness (m') for the 2100 CVC combinations of the English language. Psychological Reports, 1961, 8, 478–521.
6.
ParksT. E.Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 44–58.
7.
WickelgrenW. A., & NormanD. A.Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966, 3, 316–347.
