Reversal indices were extracted from spatial reversal data obtained from 5 mammalian and 9 avian species currently being tested with successive discrimination methodology. While neither Problem I nor its first reversal errors significantly separated avian and mammalian species, the reversal index did, largest index being obtained for birds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GossetteR. L., & CohenH.Error reduction by pigeons on a spatial successive reversal task under conditions of non-correction. Psychological Reports, 1966, 18, 367–370.
2.
GossetteR. L., GossetteM., & InmanN.Successive discrimination reversal performance by the Greater Hill Myna. Animal Behavior, 1966, 14, 50–53.
3.
GossetteR. L., GossetteM., & RiddellW.Comparisons of successive discrimination reversal performances among closely and remotely related avian species. Animal Behavior, 1966, 14, 560–564.
4.
GossetteR. L., & InmanN.Comparison of spatial successive discrimination reversal performances of two groups of New World monkeys. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 23, 169–170.
5.
HarlowH. F.Learning set and error factor theory. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: a study of a science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 492–537.
6.
RajalakshmiR., & JeevesM.The relative difficulty of reversal learning (reversal index) as a basis of behavioral comparisons. Animal Behavior, 1965, 13, 203–211.
7.
WarrenJ. M.Comparative psychology of learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 1965, 16, 95–118.
