By means of an eye-marker camera, films were taken of the proportion of time Ss spent fixating the more complex (MC) alternative of visual patterns exposed in pairs for 25-sec. intervals. It was expected that under the effects of 10 mg. d-amphetamine, an arousing agent, Ss would reduce the proportion of time spent attending to the MC alternatives. Instead, the shift was in the opposite direction. The results were discussed in terms of "free" and "forced" exploration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlyneD. E.The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 55, 289–296. (a)
2.
BerlyneD. E.Supplementary report: complexity and orienting responses with longer exposures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 56, 183. (b)
3.
Berlyne, Conflict D. E., arousal, and curiosity. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1960.
4.
BerlyneD. E.Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1963, 17, 274–290. (a)
5.
BerlyneD. E.Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behaviour. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: a study of a science. Vol. 5. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 284–364. (b)
6.
BerlyneD. E., & LewisJ.L.Effects of heightened arousal on human exploratory behaviour. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1963, 17, 398–411.
7.
BrenglemannJ. C.d-Amphetamine and Amytal: Ii. Effect of certainty and adequacy of certainty in recall and recognition. Journal of Mental Science, 1958, 104, 160–166.
8.
CallowayE., & DemboD.Narrowed attention. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1958, 79, 74–90.
9.
CameronJ. S., SpechtP. G., & WendtG. R.Effects of amphetamines on moods, emotions, and motivations. Journal of Psychology, 1965, 61, 93–121.
10.
DavisD. R.Psychomotor effects of analeptics and their relation to "fatigue" phenomena in aircrews. British Medical Bulletin, 1947, 5, 43–45.
11.
DayH.Exploratory behaviour as a function of individual differences and level of arousal. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univer. of Toronto, 1965. (Microfilm No. 66-1064. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Univer. Microfilms Inc.)
12.
DmscollJ. M., & LanzettaJ. T.Effects of problem uncertainty and prior arousal on pre-decisional information search. Psychological Reports, 1964, 14, 975–988.
13.
HawkinsC. F., & LanzettaJ.T.Uncertainty, importance, and arousal as determinants of pre-decisional information search. Psychological Reports, 1965, 17, 791–800.
14.
HaywoodH. C.Relationships among anxiety, seeking of novel stimuli, and level of unassimilated percepts. Journal of Personality, 1961, 29, 105–114.
15.
HaywoodH. C.Novelty-seeking behaviour as a function of manifest anxiety and physiological arousal. Journal of Personality, 1962, 30, 63–74.
16.
HaywoodH. C, & HuntJ.McV.Effects of epinephrine upon novelty preference and arousal. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 206–213.
17.
HllgardE. R.Motivation in learning theory. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: a study of a science. Vol.5. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 253–283.
Hunt, J. McV.Motivation inherent in information processing and action. In HarveyO. J. (Ed.), Cognitive factors in motivation and social organization. New York: Ronald, 1963. Pp. 35–94.
20.
HurstP. M.The effect of d-amphetamine on risk-taking. Psychopharmacologia, 1962, 3, 283–290.
21.
LandisC, & HuntW. A.The conscious correlates of the galvanic skin response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, 505–529.
22.
MackworthN. H., & Llewellyn-ThomasE.Head mounted eye-marker camera. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1962, 52, 713–716.
23.
McreynoldsP., & BryanJ.Tendency to obtain new percepts as a function of the level of unassimilated percepts. Perceptual Motor Skills, 1956, 6, 183–186.
24.
SmockC. D.The influence of psychological stress on the "intolerance of ambiguity." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 50, 177–182. (a)
25.
SmockC. D.The influence of stress on the perception of incongruity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 50, 354–356. (b)
26.
SteinbergH., RushtonR., & TinsonC.Modification of the effects of an amphetamine-barbiturate mixture by the past experience of rats. Nature, 1961, 192, 533–535.
27.
StretchR.Effects of amphetamine and pentobarbitone on exploratory behaviour in rats. Nature, 1963, 199, 787–789.
28.
WelkerW. I."Free" vs "forced" exploration of a novel situation by rats. Psychological Reports, 1957, 3, 95–108. (Monogr. Suppl. 2)
29.
WlmerR. E., & FullerJ.L.The effects of (d-amphetamine sulphate on three exploratory behaviours. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1965, 19, 94–103.