Ss adjusted variable auditory and tactile durations to equal standard durations in the opposite mode. No differences between auditory and tactile time judgments were observed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BehanI., & BevanW.The perceived duration of auditory and visual intervals: cross-modal comparisons and interaction. Amer. J. Psychol., 1961, 74, 17–26.
2.
GeldardF. A.The perception of mechanical vibration: Ii. The response of pressure receptors. Iii. The frequency function. J. gen. Psychol., 1940, 22, 271–289.
3.
GoldstoneS., BoardmanW. K., & LhamonW. T.Intersensory comparisons of temporal judgments. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 57, 243–248.
4.
GoldstoneS., & GoldfarbJ. L.Auditory and visual time judgment. J. gen. Psychol., 1964, 70, 639–687.
5.
GoldstoneS., & GoldfarbJ. L.Direct comparison of auditory and visual durations. J. exp. Psychol., 1964, 67, 483–485.
6.
GoldstoneS., JerniganC, LhamonW. T., & BoardmanW. K.A further note on intersensory differences in temporal judgment. Percept, mot. Skills, 1959, 9, 252.
7.
GrossE. E.Measurement of vibration. Cambridge, Mass.: General Radio Co., 1955.
8.
LhamonW. T., EdelbergR., & GoldstoneS.A comparison of tactile and auditory time judgment. Percept, mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 366.
