Neuromotor and movement latencies were recorded from the stretched and slack muscles of the preferred upper arm in 6 Ss. Both latencies were significantly shorter from the stretched position. Possible factors underlying this finding are discussed. The results further suggest that traditional measures of RT may be misleading when used as indices of variations in central functioning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavisJ. F.Manual of surface electromyography. Wadc Tech. Rep., 59–184, 1959.
2.
DavisR. C.Set and muscular tension. Indiana Vniver. Publ. Sci. Ser. 1940, No. 10. (Quoted by Woodworth R. S., & Schlosberg H. Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1954.
3.
GbllhornE.Physiological foundations of neurology and psychiatry. Minneapolis: Univer. of Minnesota Press, 1953.
4.
HuntC. C, & KufflbrS. W.Further study of efferent small-nerve fibres to mammalian muscle spindles, multiple spindle innervation and activity during contraction. J. Physiol., 1951, 113, 283–297.
5.
MarkR. F.Tonic stretch reflexes in the calf muscles of normal human subjects. Nature, 1963, 199, 50–52.
6.
SmithL. E., & WhitleyJ. D.Faster reaction time through facilitation of neuro-mus-cular junctional transmission in muscles under maximal stretch. Percept. mot-Skills, 1964, 19, 503–509.
7.
WoodworthR. S., & SchlosbergH.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1954.
