36 mongoloid Ss were assigned to a primary, a secondary, or a social reinforcement group on the basis of MA and were presented a visual discrimination task in which form was the relevant cue. The secondary reinforcement group (token redeemable for candy) performed at a significantly higher level than did the primary reinforcement group (candy), while the performance of the social reinforcement group (verbal approval) did not differ significantly from either of the others.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EdwardsA. L.Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rine-hart, & Winston, 1960.
2.
EllisN. R., & PryerM. W.Primary versus secondary reinforcement in simple discrimination learning of mental defectives. Psychological Reports, 1958, 4, 67–70.
3.
HeberR.Research on personality disorders and characteristics of the mentally retarded. Mental Retardation Abstracts, 1964, 1, 304–325.
4.
LlndquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
