A non-reading variation of the Stroop color-word test was given to 18 children with reading disability and 18 individually age-matched normal readers. Although the interference effect was observed in both groups of Ss, the intensity of the effect did not differ between groups. These results suggest that children with reading disability are distracted no more than are normal readers by competing elements of the stimulus-field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KleinG. S.Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color naming. Paper presented at Psychonomic Society, New York, August, 1961.
2.
RobinsonH. M.Why pupils fail in reading. Chicago: Univer. Chicago Press, 1946.
3.
RouseR. O., & MaasJ.B.Interference with color naming as a function of degree of practice on the color-bearing materials. Paper read at Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, April, 1961.
4.
RouseR. O., & MayerF.On the reduction of response competition by practice providing separate response channels. Paper read at Psychonomic Society, New York, August, 1961.
5.
StroopJ. R.Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. exp. Psychol., 1935, 18, 643–661.
6.
VernonM. D.Backwardness in reading. Cambridge: Univer. Press, 1957.