This review of research with the IES Test considers the stimulus properties, response tendencies, standardization, reliability and validity. Suggestions are made for revision of the manual and the subtests and for further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarclayL., & BarclayJ.Measured indices of perceptual distortion and impulsivity as related to sociometric scores and teacher ratings. Psychol. in the Sch., 1965, 2, 372–375.
BortnerR.Personality differences in preferences for skill- or chance-determined outcomes. Percept. mot. Skills, 1964, 18, 765–772. (a)
6.
BortnerR.School subject preference and the structure of value systems. Percept. mot. Skills, 1964, 18, 741–747. (b)
7.
BortnerR.The Ies Test and a performance measure of intelligence. Percept. mot. Skills, 1966, 22,171–175.
8.
CanestrariR.Spatial stimulus generalization gradients and id, ego, and superego strength. Percept. mot. Skills, 1964, 19, 51–55.
9.
CharnesG.The relative strengths of impulse, ego, and superego in latency, adolescence, and adulthood. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Reserve Univer., 1953.
10.
DombroseL., & SlobinM.An approach to the measurement of the relative strengths of impulse, ego, and superego, and the determination of the effects of impulses and superego upon ego functions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Reserve Univer., 1951.
GilbertJ., & LeveeR.A comparison of the personality structures of a group of young, married and a group of middle aged, married women. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 16,773–777.
14.
GoldenD.Manifestation of impulse, ego, and superego in elementary school boys and girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Reserve Univer., 1954.
15.
GoliasG., & RobackH.Ies Arrow-Dot performance of institutionalized delinquents and adolescent patients in a mental hospital. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 21, 561–562.
16.
HerronW. G.Ies Test patterns of accepted and rejected adolescents. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 15,435–438.
17.
HowardG., SignoriE., & RempelH.Further research on the Picture Titles subtest of the Ies Test. Percept. mot. Skills, 1966, 22, 119–122.
18.
JohnstonJ.A group version of the Ies Test. Unpublished master's thesis, Oklahoma State Univer., 1963.
19.
LevittE., LaddC., ThadenM., & ReaserV.An empirical study of the Picture Story Completion Test of the Ies Test. J. proj. Tech. & pers. Assess., 1966, 30, 143–148.
20.
MccormickC, SchonbrichJ., & FootlikS.Ies Arrow-Dot performance in different adolescent populations. Percept. mot. Skills, 1966, 22, 507–510.
21.
MursteinB.New thoughts about ambiguity and the Tat. J. proj. Tech. & pers. Assess., 1965,29,219–225.
22.
PinckneyG.Relative strengths of impulse, ego, and superego in female college students. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 17, 340.
23.
RankinR., & JohnstonJ.Influences of age and sex on the Ies Test. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 15, 775–778.
24.
RankinR., & WikoffR.The Ies Arrow-Dot performance of delinquents and non-delinquents. Percept. mot. Skills, 1964, 18, 207–210.
25.
RapaportD.The theoretical implications of diagnostic testing procedures. In KnightR. & FriedmanC. (Eds.), Psychoanalytic psychiatry and psychology.New York: International Univer. Press, 1954. Pp. 173–195.
26.
RempelG., & SlgnoriH.Further research on the Ies Photo-Analysis subtest with special reference to sex differences. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 17, 295–298.
27.
RempelH., SlgnoriE., & SampsonD.Differences in attribution of impulse (id), ego, and superego functions to male and female photographs. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 17, 663–665.
28.
RitzG.The relative strengths of impulse, ego, and superego in three groups of aged males. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Reserve Univer., 1954.
29.
RobackH.Admission Ies Arrow-Dot performance of mental patients presenting management problems at a state hospital. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 21, 600–602.
30.
SlgnoriE., & RempelH.Research on the Picture Titles subtest of the Ies Test. Percept. mot. Skills, 1966, 22, 161–162.
31.
SlgnoriE., SmordinM., RempelH., & SampsonD.Comparisons of impulse, ego, and superego functions in better adjusted and more poorly adjusted delinquent adolescent girls. Percept. mot. Skills, 1964, 18, 485–488.
32.
WalkerR., FarrellG., McCarthyW., & BaurL.Sex of examiner as a variable in Ies Test performance of college males. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 20, 195–198.
33.
WikoffR.Performance of delinquents and non-delinquents on the Ies Test. Unpublished master's thesis, Oklahoma State Univer., 1963.
34.
VerrilB., & CostanzaV.The Ies Test and ward behavior. J. clin. Psychol., 1962, 18, 295–297.
