Abstract
Summary,—It was hypothesized that a basic preference for categorizing events in a subordinate direction (genus-species) would characterize highly creative scientists and designers, while their less creative peers would prefer to categorize first in a superordinate direction (species-genus). Physical science researchers and product design students showed a preference for subordination but, unexpectedly, visual designers showed the opposite preference, a preference for superOrdination. A subsequent study of art students supported the findings that a preference for superOrdination characterized individuals who were highly creative in visual arts. The possible implications of this differential relationship between thinking style and kind of creativity was discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
