This paper presented evidence that "Rorschachers" and "symbolic interactionists" share an interest in the mental behavior commonly called "empathic imagination"—the former through their concern with the human movement response, the latter through their concern with the Meadian concept of role-taking.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlnsworthM. D., & KlopferB.Quantitative analysis. Evaluation of intellectual level, control, creative potential, and the introversive-extratensive relationship. In KlopferB., AinsworthM. D., KlopferW. G., & HoltR. R. (Eds.), Developments in the Rorschach technique. Yonkers: World Book, 1954. Pp. 249–316; 352-375.
2.
BeckS. J.Rorschach's test. Vol. Iii. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1952.
3.
BeckS. J.The Rorschach experiment. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1960.
4.
BochnerR., & HalpernF.The clinical application of the Rorschach test. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1945.
CollingwoodR. G.The idea of history. New York: Oxford Univer., 1961.
7.
CooleyC. H.The roots of social knowledge. Amer. J. Sociol., 1926, 32, 59–79.
8.
CooleyC. H.Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken, 1964.
9.
CottrellL. S.Jr., The analysis of situational fields in social psychology. Amer. sociol. Rev., 1942, 7, 370–382.
10.
CottrellL. S.Jr., & GallagherR.Developments in social psychology 1930-1940. New York: Beacon House, 1941.
11.
CoutuW.Role-playing vs. role-taking: an appeal for clarification. Amer. sociol. Rev., 1951, 16,180–187.
12.
DiltheyW.Pattern and meaning in history. New York: Torchbook, 1962.
13.
BarisE.The nature of human nature. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937.
14.
FarisR. E. L.Social psychology. New York: Ronald, 1952.
15.
HatchR. S.An evaluation of a forced-choice differential accuracy approach to the measurement of supervisory empathy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1962.
16.
HobartC. W., & FahlbergN.The measurement of empathy. Amer. J. Sociol., 1965, 70, 595–603.
17.
HodgesH. A.The philosophy of Wilhelm Dilthey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1952.
18.
HoltR. R.Implications of some contemporary personality theories for Rorschach rationale. In KlopferB., AinsworthM. D., KlopferW. G., & HoltR. R. (Eds.), Developments in the Rorschach technique. Yonkers: World Book, 1954. Pp. 501–560.
19.
HoltR. R.Imagery: the return of the ostracized. Amer. Psychologist, 1964, 19, 254–264.
20.
JamesW.The principles of psychology. Vol. I. New York: Dover, 1950.
21.
LevyL. H.Movement as a "rhetorical embellishment" of human percepts. J. consult. Psychol., 1955, 19, 469–471.
22.
LindesmithA. R., & StraussA.Social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1956.
23.
MacKinnonD. W.Creativity and images of the self. In WhiteR. W. (Ed.), The study of lives. New York: Atherton, 1964. Pp. 250–278.
24.
Mead, MindG. H., self, and society. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago, 1937.
25.
MeilI-DworetzkiG.The development of perception in the Rorschach. In KlopferB. (Ed.), Developments in the Rorschach technique. Vol. Ii. Yonkers: World Book, 1956. Pp. 104–176.
26.
MeyerhoffH.The philosophy of history in our time. Garden City: Anchor, 1959.
27.
MullinJ. T.Empathic drive and its influence on accuracy in judging people. Unpublished Master's thesis, Michigan State Univer., 1962.
28.
NatansonM. (Ed.) Philosophy of the social sciences. New York: Random House, 1963.
29.
NeibuhrR. R.Schleiermacher on Christ and religion. New York: Scribner's, 1964.
30.
PhillipsL., & SmithJ.G.Rorschach interpretation. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1953.
31.
RickmanH. P. Introduction. In DiltheyW., Pattern and meaning in history. New York: Torchbook, 1962. Pp. 11–63.
32.
SarbinT. R., TaftR., & BaileyD. E.Clinical inference and cognitive theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1960.
33.
SchachtelE. G.Projection and its relation to character attitudes and creativity in the kinesthetic responses. Psychiat., 1950, 13, 69–100.
34.
SchelerM.The nature of sympathy. New Haven: Yale Univer., 1954.
35.
ShibutaniT.Society and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
36.
SingerJ. L., & AntrobusJ. S.A factor-analytic study of daydreaming and conceptually-related variables. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 17, 187–209.
37.
SmithH. C.Sensitivity to people. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
38.
StarkS.Creative leadership: human vs. metal brains. J. Acad. Mgmt, 1963, 6, 160–169.
39.
StarkS.Toward a psychology of knowledge: hypotheses regarding Rorschach movement and creativity. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 21, 839–859.
40.
StarkS.Rorschach movement, fantastic daydreaming, and Freud's concept of primary process: interpretive commentary. Percept. mot. Skills, 1966, 22, 523–532.
41.
StrasserS.Phenomenology and the human sciences. Pittsburgh: Duquesne Univer., 1963.
42.
TiryakianE. A.Existential phenomenology and the sociological tradition. Amer. sociol. Rev., 1965, 30, 674–688.
43.
TiryakianE. A.Reply to Kolaja and Berger. Amer. sociol. Rev., 1966, 31, 260–264.
44.
Trevor-RoperH.Historical imagination. The Listener, 1958, 59(1509)., 357–358, 371.
45.
WinthropH.The Verstehen claim in the behavioral sciences. Rev. exist. Psychol Psychiat., 1964, 4,141–157.
46.
YoungK.Personality and problems of adjustment. New York: Crofts, 1941.
