Background: A balanced integration score (BIS) has been suggested as a more efficient combination of speed and accuracy compared with other measures of the speed – accuracy trade-off (SAT). Purpose: Nonetheless, little is known about the BIS when associated with age and skill, two central factors involved in the SAT. This study evaluated the BIS in a chess memory task (n = 229), because chess is an intellectually taxing domain where SAT is quite likely to occur and age and skill are important determinants of performance. Methods: A chess paradigm considering the combination of size (small and large) and type of chess positions (random, typical, and infrequent) was used to evaluate the BIS associated with age and skill. Results: As expected, age and skill related with the BIS in large infrequent chess positions compared with other size × type combinations. Conclusion: The BIS is useful to evaluate the combination of speed and accuracy as it relates in the expected directions with age and skill.
AckermanP. L.EllingsenV. J. (2016). Speed and accuracy indicators of test performance under different instructional conditions: Intelligence correlates. Intelligence, 56, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.02.004
3.
BlanchA. (2016). Expert performance of men and women: A cross-cultural study in the chess domain. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.050
BlanchA.AlujaA.CornadóM. P. (2015). Sex differences in chess performance: Analyzing participation rates, age, and practice in chess tournaments. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.004
6.
BlanchA.AyatsA.CornadóM. P. (2020). Slow and fast chess performance across three expert levels. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 50, Article 101749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101749
7.
BlanchA.MartínezA. (2023). Age and skill in chess: Accuracy and speed-accuracy performance in reasoning and knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(3), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4062
8.
BruyerR.BrysbaertM. (2011). Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: Is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)?Psychologica Belgica, 51(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-51-1-5
9.
CharnessN. (1976). Memory for chess positions: Resistance to interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2(6), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.2.6.641
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14.
de BruinA. B.SmitsN.RikersR.SchmidtH. (2008). Deliberate practice predicts performance over time in adolescent chess players and drop-outs: A linear mixed models analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 99(4), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X295631
15.
de GrootA. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess (2nd ed.) Mouton.
16.
EiseleP. (2004). Judgment and decision-making: Experts’ and Novices’ evaluation of chess positions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98(1), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.98.1.237-248
17.
EloA. (1978). The rating of chess players, past and present. Batsford.
18.
EstradaE.RománF. J.AbadF. J.ColomR. (2017). Separating power and speed components of standardized intelligence measures. Intelligence, 61, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.02.002
19.
ForstmannB. U.TittgemeyerM.WagenmakersE. J.DerrfussJ.ImperatiD.BrownS. (2011). The speed-accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: A structural model-based approach. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(47), 17242–17249. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0309-11.2011
20.
GlickmanM. E. (1995). A comprehensive guide to chess ratings. American Chess Journal, 3(1), 59–102.
21.
GlickmanM. E.GrayJ. R.MoralesC. J. (2005). Combining speed and accuracy to assess error-free cognitive processes. Psychometrika, 70(3), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-002-0999-3
HittnerJ. B.MayK.SilverN. C. (2003). A monte carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations. The Journal of General Psychology, 130(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300309601282
28.
HowardR. W. (2013). Practice other than playing games apparently has only a modest role in the development of chess expertise. British Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02097.x
29.
JastrzembskiT. S.CharnessN.VasyukovaC. (2006). Expertise and age effects on knowledge activation in chess. Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.401
30.
KieselA.KundeW.PohlC.BernerM.HoffmannJ. (2009). Playing chess unconsciously. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014499
31.
KrivecJ.BratkoI.GuidM. (2021). Identification and conceptualization of procedural chunks in chess. Cognitive Systems Research, 69, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.05.001
32.
LarkinJ.McDermottJ.SimonD. P.SimonH. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208(4450), 1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4450.1335
33.
LiesefeldH. R.FuX.ZimmerH. D. (2015). Fast and careless or careful and slow? Apparent holistic processing in mental rotation is explained by speed-accuracy trade-offs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1140–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000081
34.
LiesefeldH. R.JanczykM. (2019). Combining speed and accuracy to control for speed-accuracy trade-offs (?). Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1076-x
35.
LinharesA.FreitasA. E. T. A.MendesA.SilvaJ. S. (2012). Entanglement of perception and reasoning in the combinatorial game of chess: Differential errors of strategic reconstruction. Cognitive Systems Research, 13(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.12.006
36.
LowesJ.HancockP. J. B.BobakA. K. (2024). A new way of classifying developmental prosopagnosia: Balanced integration score. Cortex, 172, 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.011
37.
MarisG.Van der MaasH. (2012). Speed-accuracy response models: Scoring rules based on response time and accuracy. Psychometrika, 77(4), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9288-y
38.
MoxleyJ. H.CharnessN. (2013). Meta-analysis of age and skill effects on recalling chess positions and selecting the best move. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(5), 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0420-5
R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
41.
SheppardL. D.VernonP. P. (2008). Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.015
42.
SimonH. A.ChaseW. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61(1), 394–403.
43.
StarnsJ. J.RatcliffR. (2010). The effects of aging on the speed-accuracy compromise: Boundary optimality in the difussion model. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018022
44.
ThomasR. P.LawrenceA. (2018). Assessment of expert performance compared across professional domains. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.009
45.
UnterrainerJ. M.KallerC. P.HalsbandU.RahmB. (2006). Planning abilities and chess: A comparison of chess and non-chess players on the tower of London task. British Journal of Psychology, 97(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712605X71407
46.
VaciN.GulaB.BilalicM. (2015). Is age really cruel to experts? Compensatory effects of activity. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 740–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000056
van der MaasH. L. J.WagenmakersE. J. (2005). A psychometric analysis of chess expertise. American Journal of Psychology, 118(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/30039042
49.
VandierendonckA. (2017). A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0721-5
50.
VandierendonckA. (2021). On the utility of integrated speed-accuracy measures when speed-accuracy trade-off is present. Journal of Cognition, 4(1)(22), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.154
