In this study, we investigated the impact of aspartame and sucrose on short-term cognitive performance. We employed a quasi-randomized-controlled, double-anonymous design, and had 130 participants undergo two study visits in a randomized order. The shorter visit included a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, a fasting blood glucose (BG) test, and cognitive assessments from the NIH-toolbox. During the longer visit, participants underwent fasting BG testing before consuming a 500 ml beverage of either a 0.05% aspartame solution, an 11% sucrose solution, or water (with these beverage groups randomized). BG tests and cognitive assessments were completed twice more, at 20-min post-beverage consumption (20m PC) and at 60-min post-beverage consumption (60m PC). BG responses were as predicted, with participants in the water and AS groups responding similarly and remaining at fasting levels, and the sucrose group showing a spike in BG at 20m PC and returning to baseline by 60m PC (p < .0001). We found no group differences in cognitive performance at any time point (p = .6172). Cognitive test performance improved from the first test to subsequent tests regardless of beverage group (p < .0001). Although we found no group differences in short-term cognitive performance as a function of sweetener condition, more research is needed to determine the short and long-term cognitive effects of artificial sweeteners.
Al-SabahR.Al-TaiarA.RahmanA.ShabanL.Al-HarbiA.MojiminiyiO. (2020). Season of birth and sugary beverages are predictors of Raven’s standard progressive matrices scores in adolescents. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 6145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63089-2
2.
AntonS. D.MartinC. K.HanH.CoulonS.CefaluW. T.GeiselmanP.WilliamsonD. A. (2010). Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite, 55(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.03.009
3.
BasnerM.HermosilloE.NasriniJ.SaxenaS.DingesD. F.MooreT. M.GurR. C. (2020). Cognition test battery: Adjusting for practice and stimulus set effects for varying administration intervals in high performing individuals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(5), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1773765
4.
BeecherK.Alvarez CooperI.WangJ.WaltersS. B.ChehrehasaF.BartlettS. E.BelmerA. (2021). Long-term overconsumption of sugar starting at adolescence produces persistent hyperactivity and neurocognitive deficits in adulthood. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article 670430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.670430
5.
BeilharzJ. E.ManiamJ.MorrisM. J. (2015). Diet-induced cognitive deficits: The role of fat and sugar, potential mechanisms and nutritional interventions. Nutrients, 7(8), 6719–6738. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7085307
6.
BeilharzJ. E.ManiamJ.MorrisM. J. (2016). Short-term exposure to a diet high in fat and sugar, or liquid sugar, selectively impairs hippocampal-dependent memory, with differential impacts on inflammation. Behavioural Brain Research, 306, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.03.018
7.
BuchananK. L.RupprechtL. E.KaelbererM. M.SahasrabudheA.KleinM. E.VillalobosJ. A.LiuW. W.YangA.GelmanJ.ParkS.AnikeevaP.BohórquezD. V. (2022). The preference for sugar over sweetener depends on a gut sensor cell. Nature Neuroscience, 25(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00982-7
8.
ChattopadhyayS.RaychaudhuriU.ChakrabortyR. (2014). Artificial sweeteners - A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(4), 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0571-1
9.
ChongC. P.ShaharS.HaronH.DinN. C. (2019). Habitual sugar intake and cognitive impairment among multi-ethnic Malaysian older adults. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 14, 1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S211534
10.
ChoudharyA. K.LeeY. Y. (2018a). The debate over neurotransmitter interaction in aspartame usage. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience: Official Journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 56, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.06.043
11.
ChoudharyA. K.LeeY. Y. (2018b). Neurophysiological symptoms and aspartame: What is the connection?Nutritional Neuroscience, 21(5), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2017.1288340
12.
DarW. (2024). Aspartame-induced cognitive dysfunction: Unveiling role of microglia-mediated neuroinflammation and molecular remediation. International Immunopharmacology, 135, Article 112295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112295
13.
Della CorteK.FifeJ.GardnerA.MurphyB. L.KleisL.Della CorteD.SchwingshacklL.LeCheminantJ. D.BuykenA. E. (2021). World trends in sugar-sweetened beverage and dietary sugar intakes in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Nutrition Reviews, 79(3), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa070
14.
DiGirolamoA. M.OchaetaL.FloresR. M. M. (2020). Early childhood nutrition and cognitive functioning in childhood and adolescence. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 41(1_suppl), S31–S40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572120907763
15.
DonohoeR. T.BentonD. (1999). Cognitive functioning is susceptible to the level of blood glucose. Psychopharmacology, 145(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130051071
16.
ErbaşO.ErdoğanM. A.KhalilnezhadA.SolmazV.GürkanF. T.YiğittürkG.ErogluH. A.TaskiranD. (2018). Evaluation of long-term effects of artificial sweeteners on rat brain: A biochemical, behavioral, and histological study. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 32(6), Article e22053. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22053
17.
GillespieK. M.WhiteM. J.KempsE.MooreH.DymondA.BartlettS. E. (2023). The impact of free and added sugars on cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients, 16(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010075
18.
GoodrichJ. K.WatersJ. L.PooleA. C.SutterJ. L.KorenO.BlekhmanR.BeaumontM.Van TreurenW.KnightR.BellJ. T.SpectorT. D.ClarkA. G.LeyR. E. (2014). Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell, 159(4), 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053
19.
GreenM. W.TaylorM. A.EllimanN. A.RhodesO. (2001). Placebo expectancy effects in the relationship between glucose and cognition. The British Journal of Nutrition, 86(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2001398
20.
GuiZ.HuangS.ChenY.ZhaoY.JiangN.ZhangS.ChenY. (2021). Association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and executive function in children. Nutrients, 13(12), 4563. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124563
21.
HeatonR. K.AkshoomoffN.TulskyD.MungasD.WeintraubS.DikmenS.BeaumontJ.CasalettoK. B.ConwayK.SlotkinJ.GershonR. (2014). Reliability and validity of composite scores from the NIH toolbox cognition battery in adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(6), 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000241
22.
HumphriesP.PretoriusE.NaudéH. (2008). Direct and indirect cellular effects of aspartame on the brain. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 62(4), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602866
23.
JohnstonC. A.ForeytJ. P. (2014). Robust scientific evidence demonstrates benefits of artificial sweeteners [Review of robust scientific evidence demonstrates benefits of artificial sweeteners]. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 25(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2013.09.007
24.
JonesS. K.McCarthyD. M.StanwoodG. D.SchatschneiderC.BhideP. G. (2023). Learning and memory deficits produced by aspartame are heritable via the paternal lineage. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 14326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41213-2
25.
KanbayM.GulerB.ErtugluL. A.DagelT.AfsarB.IncirS.BaygulA.CovicA.Andres-HernandoA.Sánchez-LozadaL. G.LanaspaM. A.JohnsonR. J. (2021). The speed of ingestion of a sugary beverage has an effect on the acute metabolic response to fructose. Nutrients, 13(6), 1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061916
26.
KendigM. D.ChowJ. Y. L.MartireS. I.RooneyK. B.BoakesR. A. (2023). Switching from sugar- to artificially-sweetened beverages: A 12-week trial. Nutrients, 15(9), 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092191
27.
KlonoffD. C.ParkesJ. L.KovatchevB. P.KerrD.BevierW. C.BrazgR. L.ChristiansenM.BaileyT. S.NicholsJ. H.KohnM. A. (2018). Investigation of the accuracy of 18 marketed blood glucose monitors. Diabetes Care, 41(8), 1681–1688. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1960
28.
KruegerC.TianL. (2004). A comparison of the general linear mixed model and repeated measures ANOVA using a dataset with multiple missing data points. Biological Research For Nursing, 6(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800404267682
LindsethG. N.CoolahanS. E.PetrosT. V.LindsethP. D. (2014). Neurobehavioral effects of aspartame consumption. Research in Nursing & Health, 37(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21595
32.
López-MezaM. S.Otero-OjedaG.EstradaJ. A.Esquivel-HernándezF. J.ContrerasI. (2022). The impact of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners on the central nervous system: Preliminary study. Nutritional Neuroscience, 25(8), 1623–1632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2021.1885239
MillerM. D.SteinmausC.GolubM. S.CastorinaR.ThilakartneR.BradmanA.MartyM. A. (2022). Potential impacts of synthetic food dyes on activity and attention in children: A review of the human and animal evidence. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 21(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00849-9
PriorB. M.CuretonK. J.ModleskyC. M.EvansE. M.SlonigerM. A.SaundersM.LewisR. D. (1997). In vivo validation of whole body composition estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Applied Physiology, 83(2), 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1997.83.2.623
39.
RibyL. M.MeikleA.GloverC. (2004). The effects of age, glucose ingestion and gluco-regulatory control on episodic memory. Age and Ageing, 33(5), 483–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afh173
40.
RobertsJ. R. (2015). The paradox of artificial sweeteners in managing obesity. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 17(1), 423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-014-0423-z
41.
RycerzK.Jaworska-AdamuJ. E. (2013). Effects of aspartame metabolites on astrocytes and neurons. Folia Neuropathologica, 51(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.5114/fn.2013.34191
42.
SaadA.Dalla ManC.NandyD. K.LevineJ. A.BharuchaA. E.RizzaR. A.BasuR.CarterR. E.CobelliC.KudvaY. C.BasuA. (2012). Diurnal pattern to insulin secretion and insulin action in healthy individuals. Diabetes, 61(11), 2691–2700. https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-1478
43.
SharmaA.AmarnathS.ThulasimaniM.RamaswamyS. (2016). Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 48(3), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.182888
SpiersP. A.SabounjianL.ReinerA.MyersD. K.WurtmanJ.SchomerD. L. (1998). Aspartame: Neuropsychologic and neurophysiologic evaluation of acute and chronic effects. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 68(3), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/68.3.531
47.
StaynorJ. M. D.SmithM. K.DonnellyC. J.SallamA. E.AcklandT. R. (2020). DXA reference values and anthropometric screening for visceral obesity in Western Australian adults. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 18731. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73631-x
48.
SuezJ.KoremT.ZeeviD.Zilberman-SchapiraG.ThaissC. A.MazaO.IsraeliD.ZmoraN.GiladS.WeinbergerA.KupermanY.HarmelinA.Kolodkin-GalI.ShapiroH.HalpernZ.SegalE.ElinavE. (2014). Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature, 514(7521), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13793
49.
Sünram-LeaS. I.FosterJ. K.DurlachP.PerezC. (2002). Investigation into the significance of task difficulty and divided allocation of resources on the glucose memory facilitation effect. Psychopharmacology, 160(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-001-0987-9
50.
SwithersS. E. (2014). A paucity of data, not robust scientific evidence: A response to Johnston and Foreyt [Review of A paucity of data, not robust scientific evidence: A response to Johnston and Foreyt]. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 25(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2013.09.003
VenturaE. E.DavisJ. N.GoranM. I. (2011). Sugar content of popular sweetened beverages based on objective laboratory analysis: Focus on fructose content. Obesity, 19(4), 868–874. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.255
53.
WolraichM. L.LindgrenS. D.StumboP. J.SteginkL. D.AppelbaumM. I.KiritsyM. C. (1994). Effects of diets high in sucrose or aspartame on the behavior and cognitive performance of children. New England Journal of Medicine, 330(5), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199402033300501
ZelazoP. D.AndersonJ. E.RichlerJ.Wallner-AllenK.BeaumontJ. L.ConwayK. P.GershonR.WeintraubS. (2014). NIH toolbox cognition battery (CB): Validation of executive function measures in adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(6), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000472
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
