Effects of Emotional and Cognitive Changes on Aesthetic Evaluation of Poetry Based on Subjective and Physiological Continuous Responses with Pupil Diameter Measurements

Abstract

Haiku poetry, a short poem with a clear form, has the potential to elucidate many unknown aspects of linguistic art. Previous studies on haiku appreciation have shown that negative emotion and cognitive ambiguity reduce aesthetic evaluation. Considering the importance of negative emotions and ambiguity in art, it is beneficial to clarify the process of emotional and cognitive changes during aesthetic evaluation. This study examined the temporal effects of emotional and cognitive changes on aesthetic evaluation from multiple perspectives by measuring the ratings of each section of haiku, continuous emotional reports, and physiological changes in pupil diameter. The 112 students first rated the haiku at three time points on items such as beauty, valence, and ambiguity. Next, they rated the same haiku continuously for 20 seconds using a joystick for valence and arousal during which the pupil diameter was measured. The results showed that a decrease in negative emotions and ambiguity explained the beauty of the haiku. In the continuous emotion reports, positive emotions gradually increased for positive haiku and negative emotions gradually increased for negative haiku, while arousal decreased once and then gradually increased for both forms of haiku. Additionally, an increase in pupil diameter also explained the beauty. The roles of negative emotions and ambiguity were revealed by focusing on both subjective and physiological indicators of emotional and cognitive changes during haiku appreciation. This study has contributed to the advancement of our understanding of linguistic art forms by empirically exploring conscious and unconscious emotional and cognitive responses to haiku.

Keywords

haiku poetry aesthetic appreciation ambiguity emotions pupil diameter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arend

M. G.

Schäfer

(2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195

Bachorik

J. P.

Bangert

Loui

Larke

Berger

Rowe

Schlaug

(2009). Emotion in motion: Investigating the time-course of emotional judgments of musical stimuli. Music Perception, 26(4), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2009.26.4.355

Belfi

A. M.

Vessel

E. A.

Starr

G. G.

(2018). Individual ratings of vividness predict aesthetic appeal in poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000153

Blasko

D. G.

Merski

D. W.

(1998). Haiku poetry and metaphorical thought: An invitation to interdisciplinary study. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1101_5

Bliss-Moreau

Williams

L. A.

Santistevan

A. C.

(2020). The immutability of valence and arousal in the foundation of emotion. Emotion, 20(6), 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000606

Blohm

Versace

Methner

Wagner

Schlesewsky

Menninghaus

(2022). Reading poetry and prose: Eye movements and acoustic evidence. Discourse Processes, 59(3), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.2015188

Booth

J. R.

Burman

D. D.

Meyer

J. R.

Gitelman

D. R.

Parrish

T. B.

Mesulam

M. M.

(2002). Modality independence of word comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 16(4), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10054

Bradley

M. M.

Miccoli

Escrig

M. A.

Lang

P. J.

(2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x

Brasseur

Grégoire

Bourdu

Mikolajczak

(2013). The profile of emotional competence (PEC): Development and validation of a self-reported measure that fits dimensions of emotional competence theory. PLOS One, 8(5), Article e62635. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062635

10.

Brooks

S. P.

Gelman

(1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787

11.

Buchweitz

Mason

R. A.

Tomitch

L. M. B.

Just

M. A.

(2009). Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. Psychology and Neuroscience, 2(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2009.2.003

12.

Bürkner

P. C.

(2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01

13.

Choi

Koo

Choi

J. A.

(2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298568

14.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1992). NEO™ revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and the NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

15.

Davis

M. H.

(1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(85), 1–19.

16.

Durbin

Koopman

S. J.

(2012). Time series analysis by state space methods. Oxford University Press.

17.

Etz

Vandekerckhove

(2018). Introduction to Bayesian inference for psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1262-3

18.

Frame

Mehl

Head

Belfi

A. M.

(2024). The influence of sensory modality on aesthetic judgments of poetry. In Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000673

19.

Geyer

Günther

Müller

H. J.

Kacian

Liesefeld

H. R.

Pierides

(2020). Reading English-language haiku: An eye-movement study of the “cut effect”. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.2.2

20.

Girard

J. M.

C Wright

A. G.

(2018). Darma: Software for dual axis rating and media annotation. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 902–909. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0915-5

21.

Green

Macleod

C. J.

(2016). Package “SIMR”. Retrieved from. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/simr/index.html

22.

Grewe

Nagel

Kopiez

Altenmüller

(2007). Emotions over time: Synchronicity and development of subjective, physiological, and facial affective reactions to music. Emotion, 7(4), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.774

23.

Hermann

J. M.

Thomas

Franziska

Jim

Stella

(2017). Reading English-language haiku: Processes of meaning construction revealed by eye movements. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 10(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.16910/10.1.4

24.

Himichi

Osanai

Goto

Fujita

Kawamura

Davis

M. H.

Nomura

(2017). Development of a Japanese version of the interpersonal reactivity Index. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 88(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.88.15218 (in Japanese with English abstract)

25.

Hitsuwari

Nomura

(2021). Developing and validating a Japanese version of the multidimensional attitude toward ambiguity scale (MAAS). Psychology, 12(04), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2021.124030

26.

Hitsuwari

Nomura

(2022). How individual states and traits predict aesthetic appreciation of haiku poetry. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 40(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237420986420

27.

Hitsuwari

Nomura

(2024a). Interaction between creation and appreciation: How linguistic art creation impacts the aesthetic evaluation of haiku poetry and ink paintings. International Journal of Psychology, 59(1), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12959

28.

Hitsuwari

Nomura

(2024b). Comparison of ambiguity and aesthetic impressions in haiku poetry between experts and novices. Poetics, 107(2), Article 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101944

29.

Hitsuwari

Nomura

(2024c). Ambiguity and beauty: Japanese-German cross-cultural comparisons on aesthetic evaluation of haiku poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(6), 1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000497

30.

Hugentobler

K. G.

Lüdtke

(2021). Micropoetry meets neurocognitive poetics: Influence of associations on the reception of poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), Article 737756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737756

31.

Iida

(2008). Poetry writing as expressive pedagogy in an EFL context: Identifying possible assessment tools for haiku poetry in EFL freshman college writing. Assessing Writing, 13(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.001

32.

Imase

Kishimoto

Yamanishi

(2010). Ahita no meiku tono deai no ba gouhyou teidan 12 kanashimi wo yomu gou no fukasa. Haiku, 59(13), 203–230.

33.

Jacobs

A. M.

(2015). The scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.5.2.01jac

34.

Jakesch

Leder

(2009). Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2105–2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903038974

35.

Johnson-Laird

P. N.

Oatley

(2022). How poetry evokes emotions. Acta Psychologica, 224(2-3), Article 103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103506

36.

Kishimoto

(2008). Haiku no rikigaku. Japan: Wep. (in Japanese).

37.

Kuchinke

Trapp

Jacobs

A. M.

Leder

(2009). Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014464

38.

Laeng

Eidet

L. M.

Sulutvedt

Panksepp

(2016). Music chills: The eye pupil as a mirror to music’s soul. Consciousness and Cognition, 44(3), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.07.009

39.

Lauriola

Foschi

Mosca

Weller

(2016). Attitude toward ambiguity: Empirically robust factors in self-report personality scales. Assessment, 23(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115577188

40.

Leder

Belke

Oeberst

Augustin

(2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811

41.

Leder

Nadal

(2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode –Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084

42.

Maruyama

Ishizu

(2024). The effects of titles on the aesthetic evaluation of Japanese poetry. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 43(1), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374241270472

43.

Mehl

Gugliano

Belfi

A. M.

(2023). The role of imagery and emotion in the aesthetic appeal of music, poetry, and paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000623

44.

Menninghaus

Wagner

Hanich

Wassiliwizky

Jacobsen

Koelsch

(2017). The distancing-embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40(1), Article e347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000309

45.

Menninghaus

Wagner

Wassiliwizky

Schindler

Hanich

Jacobsen

Koelsch

(2019). What are aesthetic emotions? Psychological Review, 126(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000135

46.

Menninghaus

Wallot

(2021). What the eyes reveal about (reading) poetry. Poetics, 85(1), Article 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101526

47.

Muth

Carbon

C. C.

(2013). The Aesthetic Aha: On the pleasure of having insights into gestalt. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001

48.

Muth

Ebert

Marković

Carbon

C. C.

(2019). “Aha”ptics: Enjoying an aesthetic aha during haptic exploration. Perception, 48(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006618818014

49.

Nagamine

Toyama

(2019). Developing the Japanese version of the Southampton nostalgia scale. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 90(4), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.90.18206 (in Japanese with English abstract)

50.

Nagel

Kopiez

Grewe

Altenmüller

(2007). EMuJoy: Software for continuous measurement of perceived emotions in music. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193159

51.

Niikuni

Wang

Makuuchi

Koizumi

Kiyama

(2022). Pupil dilation reflects emotional arousal via poetic language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 129(6), 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125221126778

52.

Nitta

(2016). Monogatarisei nitsuite. Nihon University Economic Review, 85(4), 167–175. (in Japanese).

53.

Nomura

Tsuda

Rappleye

(2021). How awe works in humanitarian setting in east asia: Cultural differences in describing the experience of awe. In Chiao

J. Y.

S. C.

Turner

Lee-Tauler

S. Y.

Pringle

B. A.

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of cultural neuroscience and global mental health (pp. 221–232): Oxford University Press.

54.

Nosek

B. A.

Hardwicke

T. E.

Moshontz

Allard

Corker

K. S.

Dreber

Fidler

Hilgard

Kline Struhl

Nuijten

M. B.

Rohrer

J. M.

Romero

Scheel

A. M.

Scherer

L. D.

Schönbrodt

F. D.

Vazire

(2022). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 719–748. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157

55.

Nozaki

Koyasu

(2015). Development of a Japanese version of a short form of the profile of emotional competence. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 86(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.86.14207 (in Japanese with English abstract)

56.

Obermeier

Kotz

S. A.

Jessen

Raettig

Von Koppenfels

Menninghaus

(2016). Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0396-x

57.

Peirce

J. W.

Gray

J. R.

Simpson

MacAskill

M. R.

Höchenberger

Sogo

Kastman

Lindeløv

J. K.

(2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y

58.

Pelowski

Markey

P. S.

Forster

Gerger

Leder

(2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21(1), 80–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003

59.

Pițur

Miu

A. C.

(2025). Poetry-elicited emotions: Reading experience and psychological mechanisms. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000525

60.

Plutchik

(1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Plutchik

Kellerman

(Eds.), Emotion: theory, research, and experience (1, pp. 3–33). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7

61.

R Core Team . (2021). R foundation for statistical computing. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from. https://www.R-project.org/

62.

Routledge

Arndt

Sedikides

Wildschut

(2008). A blast from the past: The terror management function of nostalgia. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.11.001

63.

Russell

J. A.

(1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714

64.

Scheepers

Mohr

Fischer

M. H.

Roberts

A. M.

(2013). Listening to limericks: A pupillometry investigation of perceivers’ expectancy. PLOS One, 8(9), Article e74986. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074986

65.

Sharma

Castellini

Stulp

Van den Broek

E. L.

(2020). Continuous, real-time emotion annotation: A novel joystick-based analysis framework. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 11(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2772882

66.

Shimizu

(2016). An introduction to the statistical free software HAD: Suggestions to improve teaching, learning and practice data analysis. Journal of Media. Information and Communication, 1(1), 59–73. (in Japanese).

67.

Shimonaka

Nakazato

Gondo

Takayama

(1999). Nihonban NEO-PI-R, NEO-FFI shiyou manual. Tokyo shinri. Tokyo. (in Japanese).

68.

Shiota

M. N.

Keltner

John

O. P.

(2006). Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500510833

69.

Spee

B. T. M.

Arato

Mikuni

Tran

U. S.

Pelowski

Leder

(2024). The dynamics of experiencing gestalt and aha in cubist art: Pupil responses and art evaluations show a complex interplay of task, stimuli content, and time course. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(2), Article 1192565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1192565

70.

Stan Development Team . (2021). RStan: The R Interface to Stan. R Package (Version 2.21.3). Retrieved from https://mc-stan.org/

71.

Takano

Nomura

(2023). A closer look at the time course of bodily responses to awe experiences. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 22506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49681-2

72.

Uchida

(2010). A holistic view of happiness: Belief in the negative side of happiness is more prevalent in Japan than in the United States. Psychologia, 53(4), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2010.236

73.

Wagner

Scharinger

Knoop

C. A.

Menninghaus

(2021). Effects of continuous self-reporting on aesthetic evaluation and emotional responses. Poetics, 85(4), Article 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101497

74.

Wallot

Menninghaus

(2018). Ambiguity effects of rhyme and meter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(12), 1947–1954. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000557

75.

Wassiliwizky

Koelsch

Wagner

Jacobsen

Menninghaus

(2017). The emotional power of poetry: Neural circuitry, psychophysiology and compositional principles. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(8), 1229–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx069

76.

Zeileis

Grothendieck

(2005). Zoo: S3 infrastructure for regular and irregular time series. Journal of Statistical Software, 14(6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v014.i06

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.30 MB