Analogy learning refers to integrating the overall knowledge and rules of the motor skills to be learned into a more easily understandable biomechanical metaphor. The use of analogy learning in the process of acquiring motor skills enables learners to maintain the stability of their motor performance under stress or dual-task situations. However, the effectiveness of this learning method is also affected by factors such as the number of instructions, the learners’ sports levels, and cognitive factors. Research on the cognitive mechanisms of analogy learning is limited and lacks a systematic theory. This review comprehensively analyzes research findings on the stability of motor performance in different contexts (e.g., stressful or dual-task situations) using analogy learning. It summarizes possible theoretical explanations for the influence of analogy learning on the stability of motor performance. Future research needs to delve deeper into the quality, ecological validity, and compilation of instructions as well as possible theoretical models for the cognitive mechanisms of analogy learning.
BeckerK. A.GeorgesA. F.AikenC. A. (2019). Considering a holistic focus of attention as an alternative to an external focus. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 7(2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2017-0065
2.
BlowersG. (2000). The prospects for a Jungian psychology in China. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 45(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00157
3.
BobrownickiR.CollinsD.SprouleJ.MacPhersonA. C. (2018). Redressing the balance: Commentary on “Examining motor learning in older adults using analogy instruction” by Tse, Wong, and Masters (2017). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 38, 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.05.014
4.
BobrownickiR.MacPhersonA. C.ColemanS. G.CollinsD.SprouleJ. (2015). Re-examining the effects of verbal instructional type on early stage motor learning. Human Movement Science, 44, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.023
5.
BobrownickiR.MacPhersonA. C.CollinsD.SprouleJ. (2019). The acute effects of analogy and explicit instruction on movement and performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 44, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.04.016
6.
BobrownickiR. K. (2016). Impact of verbal instruction type on movement learning and performance: A multidisciplinary investigation of analogy and explicit instruction. The University of Edinburgh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
7.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral written material. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Methodology (pp. 389–444): Allyn & Bacon.
8.
CabralD. A.DaouM.BacelarM. F.ParmaJ. O.MillerM. W. (2023). Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 51, Article 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101757
9.
CapioC. M.UigaL.LeeM. H.MastersR. S. W. (2020). Application of analogy learning in softball batting: Comparing novice and intermediate players. Sport Exercise Perform Psychology, 9(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000181
10.
Carnero-DiazA.PecciJ.Camacho-LazarragaP.LluchÁ. C. (2024). Use your imagination for better performance. Effects of analogy instruction in motor skills. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 76, Article 102766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102766
11.
ChatzopoulosD.FokaE.DoganisG.LykesasG.NikodelisT. (2020). Effects of analogy learning on locomotor skills and balance of preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 192(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1739029
12.
ChuaL. K.Jimenez-DiazJ.LewthwaiteR.KimT.WulfG. (2021). Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 147(6), 618–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000335
13.
FisherK. M. (2014). Investigating the role of a reduced-instruction approach in implicit and explicit motor learning strategies. University of Tennessee. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
14.
FittsP. M.PosnerM. I. (1967). Human performance: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
HuG.XuB. (2009). An experimental study on the performance of motor skills acquired implicitly under pressure. China Sport Science, 29(6), 57–61.
17.
JieL. J.GoodwinV.KleynenM.BraunS.NunnsM.WilsonM. (2016). Analogy learning in Parkinson’s disease: A proof-of-concept study. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 23(3), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.3.123
18.
KalE.ProséeR.WintersM.van der KampJ. (2018). Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. Plos One, 13(9), Article e0203591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203591
19.
KimS. M.QuF.LamW. K. (2020). Analogy and explicit motor learning in dynamic balance: Posturography and performance analyses. European Journal of Sport Science, 21(8), 1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1827046
20.
KleynenM.BraunS. M.BleijlevensM. H.LexisM. A.RasquinS. M.HalfensJ.WilsonM. R.BeurskensA. J.MastersR. S. W.MastersR. S. (2014). Using a Delphi technique to seek consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to implicit and explicit forms of motor learning. Plos One, 9(6), Article e100227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100227
21.
KoedijkerJ. M.OudejansR. R.BeekP. J. (2007). Explicit rules and direction of attention in learning and performing the table tennis forehand. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.07.012
22.
KoedijkerJ. M.PooltonJ. M.MaxwellJ. P.OudejansR. R. D.BeekP. J.MastersR. S. (2011). Attention and time constraints in perceptual-motor learning and performance: Instruction, analogy, and skill level. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.08.002
23.
KokM.NuijJ.KalE.van der KampJ. (2022). Individual differences in working memory capacity and conscious processing do not explain explicit and implicit learning outcomes in physical education. Human Movement Science, 86, Article 103003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2022.103003
24.
LamW. K. (2008). The attentional demands of implicit motor learning. The University of Hong Kong. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
25.
LamW. K.MaxwellJ. P.MastersR. S. (2009a). Analogy learning and the performance of motor skill under pressure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31(3), 337–367. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.3.337
26.
LamW. K.MaxwellJ. P.MastersR. S. (2009b). Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764
27.
LawJ.MastersR.BrayS. R.EvesF.BardswellI. (2003). Motor performance as a function of audience affability and metaknowledge. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25(4), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.4.484
28.
LawrenceG. R.GottwaldV. M.HardyJ.KhanM. A. (2011). Internal and external focus of attention in a novice form sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 82(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599775
29.
LeeR. W.TseA. C.WongT. W. (2018). Application of analogy in learning badminton among older adults: Implications for rehabilitation. Motor Control, 23(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2017-0037,347
30.
LiaoC. M.MastersR. S. (2001). Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Science, 19(5), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410152006081
31.
LolaA. C.TzetzisG. C. (2021). The effect of explicit, implicit and analogy instruction on decision making skill for novices, under stress. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.1877325
32.
MakT. C.CapioC. M.WongT. W. (2022). Effects of single-task, dual-task and analogy training during gait rehabilitation of older adults at risk of falling: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010315
33.
MakT. C.WongT. W. (2022). Do attentional focus instructions affect real-time reinvestment during level-ground walking in older adults?Cognitive Processing, 23(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01044-3
34.
MalhotraN.PooltonJ. M.WilsonM. R.OmuroS.MastersR. S. W. (2015). Dimensions of movement specific reinvestment in practice of a golf putting task. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.11.008
MastersR. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02446.x
37.
MastersR. S. W.LiaoC. (2003). Chunking as a characteristic of implicit motor learning. In European congress of sport psychology.
38.
MastersR. S. W.MaxwellJ. P. (2008). The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 160–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840802287218
39.
MastersR. S. W.PooltonJ. M.MaxwellJ. P.RaabM. (2008). Implicit motor learning and complex decision making in time-constrained environments. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.1.71-80
40.
MaxwellJ. P.MastersR. S. W.EvesF. F. (2000). From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404100365180
41.
MeierC.FettJ.GröbenB. (2019). The influence of analogy instruction and motion rule instruction on the learning process of junior tennis players. Qualitative assessment of serve performance. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 49(3), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-019-00589-y
42.
MeierC.FrankC.GröbenB.SchackT. (2020). Verbal instructions and motor learning: How analogy and explicit instructions influence the development of mental representations and tennis serve performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00002
43.
MullenR.FaullA.JonesE. S.KingstonK. (2015). Evidence for the effectiveness of holistic process goals for learning and performance under pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 17, 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.11.003
44.
MullenR.HardyL. (2010). Conscious processing and the process goal paradox. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.3.275
PooltonJ. M.MastersR. S.MaxwellJ. P. (2007a). Passing thoughts on the evolutionary stability of implicit motor behaviour: Performance retention under physiological fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.008
47.
PooltonJ. M.MastersR. S.MaxwellJ. P. (2007b). The development of a culturally appropriate analogy for implicit motor learning in a Chinese population. The Sport Psychologist, 21(4), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.21.4.375
48.
PooltonJ. M.MastersR. S. W. (2014). Chunking/dechunking. In EklundR. C.TenenbaumG. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology (pp. 129–130). Sage.
49.
PooltonJ. M.MastersR. S. W.MaxwellJ. P. (2003). Analogy learning as a chunking mechanism. Hong Kong: Paper presented at the Hong Kong student conference in sports medicine. Rehabilitation, and Exercise Science.
50.
PooltonJ. M.MaxwellJ. P.MastersR. S. W.RaabM. (2006). Benefits of an external focus of attention: Common coding or conscious processing?Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500130854
51.
PooltonJ. M.ZachryT. L. (2007). So you want to learn implicitly? Coaching and learning through implicit motor learning techniques. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1260/174795407780367177
52.
RamezaniF.SaemiE.DoustanM. (2022). Children’s motor learning and working memory: The role of visual and verbal analogy learning. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, 29(2), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjst-2022-0008
53.
RamezanzadeH.SaemiE.BroadbentD. P.PorterJ. M. (2022). An examination of the contextual interference effect and the errorless learning model during motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 54(6), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2022.2072265
54.
SchackT. (2007). Repräsentation und Bewegungssteuerung-die kognitiv-perzeptuelle Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 14(3), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010.14.3.104
55.
SchlapkohlN.HohmannT.RaabM. (2012). Effects of instructions on performance outcome and movement patterns for novices and experts in table tennis. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 43(6), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP2012.43.053
56.
SchückerL.EbbingL.HagemannN. (2010). Learning by analogies: Implications for performance and attentional processes under pressure. Human Movement, 2(11), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10038-010-0025-z
57.
SchückerL.HagemannN.StraussB. (2013). Analogy vs. technical learning in a golf putting task: An analysis of performance outcomes and attentional processes under pressure. Human Movement, 14(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.2478/humo-2013-0021
58.
TielemannN. (2008). Modifikation motorischer Lernprozesse durch Instruktionen. Wirksamkeit von Analogien und Bewegungsregeln. Universität Flensburg. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
59.
TseA. C.FongS. S.WongT. W.MastersR. (2017a). Analogy motor learning by young children: A study of rope skipping. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1214184
60.
TseA. C. Y.MastersR. S. W. (2019). Improving motor skill acquisition through analogy in children with autism spectrum disorders. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 41, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.002
61.
TseA. C.WongT. W.MastersR. S. (2017b). Examining motor learning in older adults using analogy instruction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.10.005
62.
UigaL.PooltonJ. M.CapioC. M.WilsonM. R.RyuD.MastersR. S. (2020). The role of conscious processing of movements during balance by young and older adults. Human Movement Science, 70, Article 102566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.102566
63.
Van DuijnT.CrocketH.MastersR. S. (2020). The role of instruction preference in analogy learning: Brain activity and motor performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 47, Article 101615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101615
64.
Van DuijnT.HoskensM. C.MastersR. S. (2019a). Analogy instructions promote efficiency of cognitive processes during hockey push-pass performance. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 8(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000142
65.
Van DuijnT. V.ThomasS.MastersR. S. W. (2019b). Chipping in on the role of conscious processing during children’s motor learning by analogy. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 14(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954119841162
66.
van GinnekenW. F.PooltonJ. M.MastersR. S. W.CapioC. M.KalE. C.van der KampJ. (2017). Comparing the effects of conscious monitoring and conscious control on motor performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 30, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.03.001
67.
WangC.LiuX.ZhangZ.XuS.ZhangQ.ChenJ.ZhengW. (2024). The influence of motor learning methods on motor performance stability: The moderating effect of reinvestment propensity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 72, Article 102601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102601
68.
WulfG. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(1), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728
69.
WulfG.HößM.PrinzW. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899809601334
70.
WulfG.LandersM.LewthwaiteR.TöllnerT. (2009). External focus instructions reduce postural instability in individuals with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy, 89(2), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080045
71.
WulfG.McNevinN.SheaC. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(4), 1143–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756012
72.
YoungW. R.Mark WilliamsA. (2015). How fear of falling can increase fall-risk in older adults: Applying psychological theory to practical observations. Gait & Posture, 41(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.006
ZeniyaH.TanakaH. (2021). Effects of different types of analogy instruction on the performance and inter-joint coordination of novice darts learners. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 57, Article 102053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102053
75.
ZhuF. F.PooltonJ. M.WilsonM. R.MaxwellJ. P.MastersR. S. W. (2011). Neural co-activation as a yardstick of implicit motor learning and the propensity for conscious control of movement. Biological Psychology, 87(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.004
