The perception of verticality is formed through the integration of multisensory gravitational information, including somatosensory, visual, and vestibular inputs. Older adults exhibit visual dependency (VD) as they rely more on visual information to compensate for reduced somatosensory and vertical perception. Increased VD is associated with falls, and the dynamic subjective visual vertical (SVV) is used to assess VD. However, the measurement reliability of dynamic SVV and VD using virtual reality (VR), which has garnered considerable attention in recent years, remains unclear. Therefore, our purpose in this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of dynamic SVVs and VDs using a VR method. We evaluated static and dynamic SVV of 40 older adults using a smartphone-based VR system (SVR-SVV). Dynamic SVV consisted of numerous spheres on the background rotating clockwise (CW-SVV) or counterclockwise (CCW-SVV). Each SVV measurement consisted of one set of 10 trials. VD was calculated as the mean value of dynamic SVV minus the mean values of static SVV. A re-test was conducted after one week. Reliability was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2, k) for each SVV measure. We observed no systematic bias in any of the SVV values, which were 0.1° (SD = 2.8°), 13.3° (SD = 8.3°), −12.8° (SD = 6.9°), and 15.7° (SD = 8.1°) for static SVV, CW-SVV, CCW-SVV, and VD, respectively. Test-retest reliability was good for static SVV (ICC = .817, p < .001), CW-SVV (ICC = .896, p < .001) and excellent for CCW-SVV (ICC = .914, p < .001), VD (ICC = .937, p < .001). The dynamic SVV and VD measurements using SVR-SVV demonstrated good test-retest reliability. Moreover, the SVR-SVV is more portable than conventional methods, making it highly useful in clinical practice.
AkinF. W.MurnaneO. D.PearsonA.ByrdS.KellyK. J. (2011). Normative data for the subjective visual vertical test during centrifugation. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 22(7), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.22.7.6
BarrC. J.McLoughlinJ. V.van den BergM. E.SturnieksD. L.CrottyM.LordS. R. (2016). Visual field dependence is associated with reduced postural Sway, dizziness and falls in older People Attending a falls clinic. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 20(6), 671–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0681-y
4.
BarraJ.MarquerA.JoassinR.ReymondC.MetgeL.ChauvineauV.PérennouD. (2010). Humans use internal models to construct and update a sense of verticality. Brain: Journal of Neurology, 133(Pt 12), 3552–3563. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq311
BonanI. V.GuettardE.LemanM. C.ColleF. M.YelnikA. P. (2006). Subjective visual vertical perception relates to balance in acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(5), 642–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.01.019
7.
ChengY.ZhangY.MaW.ChenY.ZhangQ.XuM. (2022). Effect of age on virtual reality-assisted subjective visual vertical and subjective visual horizontal at different head-tilt angles. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 88(Suppl 3), S139–S146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.10.001
8.
CousinsS.CutfieldN. J.KaskiD.PallaA.SeemungalB. M.GoldingJ. F.StaabJ. P.BronsteinA. M. (2014). Visual dependency and dizziness after vestibular neuritis. PLoS One, 9(9), e105426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105426
9.
DockheerK. M.BockischC. J.TarnutzerA. A. (2018). Effects of optokinetic stimulation on verticality perception are Much larger for vision-based Paradigms than for vision-Independent Paradigms. Frontiers in Neurology, 9(2), 323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00323
10.
DoğanN. Ö. (2018). Bland-altman analysis: A paradigm to understand correlation and agreement. Turk J Emerg Med, 18(4), 139–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.09.001
11.
EmbrechtsE.van der WaalC.AnseeuwD.van BuijnderenJ.LeroijA.LafosseC.NijboerT. C.TruijenS.SaeysW. (2023). Association between spatial neglect and impaired verticality perception after stroke: A systematic review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 66(3), 101700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101700
12.
GuerrazM.YardleyL.BertholonP.PollakL.RudgeP.GrestyM. A.BronsteinA. M. (2001). Visual vertigo: Symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control. Brain: Journal of Neurology, 124(Pt 8), 1646–1656. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.8.1646
JekaJ. J.AllisonL. K.KiemelT. (2010). The dynamics of visual reweighting in healthy and fall-prone older adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 42(4), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2010.481693
15.
KiperP.GodartN.CavalierM.BerardC.CieślikB.FedericoS.KiperA.PellicciariL.MeroniR. (2023). Effects of immersive virtual reality on Upper-Extremity stroke Rehabilitation: A systematic review with Meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010146
16.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
17.
LordS. R.WebsterI. W. (1990). Visual field dependence in elderly fallers and non-fallers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.2190/38MH-2EF1-E36Q-75T2
18.
LudbrookJ. (2002). Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: A critical review. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 29(7), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03686.x
19.
MichelsonP. L.McCaslinD. L.JacobsonG. P.PetrakM.EnglishL.HattonK. (2018). Assessment of subjective visual vertical (SVV) using the “bucket test” and the virtual SVV system. American Journal of Audiology, 27(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0019
20.
Montero-OdassoM.van der VeldeN.MartinF. C.PetrovicM.TanM. P.RygJ.Aguilar-NavarroS.AlexanderN. B.BeckerC.BlainH.BourkeR.CameronI. D.CamicioliR.ClemsonL.CloseJ.DelbaereK.DuanL.DuqueG.DyerS. M.Task Force on Global Guidelines for Falls in Older Adults & MasudT. (2022). World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: A global initiative. Age and Ageing, 51(9), afac205. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac205
21.
Obrero-GaitánE.Manrique-NavarroM.Lérida-OrtegaM. Á.Rodríguez-AlmagroD.Osuna-PérezM. C.Lomas-VegaR. (2020). Misperception of visual verticality in patients with Primary headache Disorders: A systematic review with Meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 10(10), 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10100664
22.
PiscicelliC.PérennouD. (2017). Visual verticality perception after stroke: A systematic review of methodological approaches and suggestions for standardization. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 60(3), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2016.02.004
23.
RazzakR. A.JahramiH.HusniM.AliM. E.BagustJ. (2022). Perceptual visual dependence for spatial orientation in patients with schizophrenia. PLoS One, 17(12), e0278718. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278718
24.
SchwarzA. J.StraumannD.TarnutzerA. A. (2015). Diurnal Fluctuations of verticality perception - Lesser Precision Immediately after Waking up in the morning. Frontiers in Neurology, 6(9), 195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00195
25.
TakasakiH.TreleavenJ.JohnstonV.JullG. (2012). Minimum repetitions for stable measures of visual dependency using the dot version of the computer-based Rod-Frame test. Manual Therapy, 17(5), 466–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.02.013
26.
TerweeC. B.BotS. D.de BoerM. R.van der WindtD. A.KnolD. L.DekkerJ.BouterL. M.de VetH. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
27.
TesioL.LongoS.RotaV. (2011). The subjective visual vertical: Validation of a simple test. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 34(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0b013e32834c45bc
28.
TotilienėM.UlozaV.LesauskaitėV.DamulevičienėG.KregždytėR.KaskiD.UlozienėI. (2021). Impaired subjective visual vertical and increased visual dependence in older adults with falls. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 13(1), 667608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.667608
29.
UlozienėI.TotilienėM.BalnytėR.KuzminienėA.KregždytėR.PaulauskasA.BlažauskasT.MarozasV.UlozaV.KaskiD. (2020). Subjective visual vertical and visual dependency in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 44(9), 102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102255
30.
WangC. H.WinnickA. A.KoY. H.WangZ.ChangT. P. (2021). Test-retest reliability of subjective visual vertical measurements with lateral head tilt in virtual reality goggles. Tzu Chi Medical Journal, 33(3), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_207_20
31.
ZwergalA.RettingerN.FrenzelC.DieterichM.BrandtT.StruppM. (2009). A bucket of static vestibular function. Neurology, 72(19), 1689–1692. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a55ecf
