An adequate foot clearance height while stepping over an obstacle is important for safety in daily life. In the present study, we examined whether visual illusions affect foot clearance during a stepping-over action, and whether this is further influenced by gaze behavior. Twelve participants stepped over an obstacle placed four meters away under conditions of three different obstacle characteristics: white, horizontal, or vertical lines. We measured the participants’ foot clearances during the step-over action and their gaze behavior during the approaching phase. Participants stepped significantly higher over the obstacles in the vertical lines (illusion) condition. The duration of gaze fixation on the obstacle positively correlated with increased foot clearance in the vertical condition, suggesting that the effect of the visual illusion on foot clearance was enhanced by prolonged gaze fixation. Conversely, prolonged fixation negatively correlated with foot clearance in the white (control) condition, implying that a cautious perception of an obstacle may contribute to efficient stepping-over action.
AgliotiS.DeSouzaJ. F.GoodaleM. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology: CB, 5(6), 679–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00133-3
2.
AshidaH.KuraguchiK.MiyoshiK. (2013). Helmholtz illusion makes you look fit only when you are already fit, but not for everyone. I-Perception, 4(5), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0595rep
3.
BergW. P.AlessioH. M.MillsE. M.TongC. (1997). Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. Age and Ageing, 26(4), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/26.4.261
4.
BlakeA. J.MorganK.BendallM. J.DallossoH.EbrahimS. B.ArieT. H.FentemP. H.BasseyE. J. (1988). Falls by elderly people at home: Prevalence and associated factors. Age and Ageing, 17(6), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/17.6.365
ChapmanG. J.HollandsM. A. (2006). Evidence for a link between changes to gaze behaviour and risk of falling in older adults during adaptive locomotion. Gait & Posture, 24(3), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.10.002
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.), Routledge.
8.
de BrouwerA. J.BrennerE.MedendorpW. P.SmeetsJ. B. (2014). Time course of the effect of the Muller-Lyer illusion on saccades and perceptual judgments. Journal of Vision, 14(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.1.4
9.
de la MallaC.BrennerE.de HaanE. H. F.SmeetsJ. B. J. (2019). A visual illusion that influences perception and action through the dorsal pathway. Communications Biology, 2(38), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0293-x
10.
ElliottD. B.ValeA.WhitakerD.BuckleyJ. G. (2009). Does my step look big in this? A visual illusion leads to safer stepping behaviour. PLoS One, 4(2), Article e4577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004577
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
12.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
13.
FingerF. W.SpeltD. K. (1947). The illustration of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(3), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055605
14.
FosterR. J.BuckleyJ. G.WhitakerD.ElliottD. B. (2016). The addition of stripes (a version of the 'horizontal-vertical illusion') increases foot clearance when crossing low-height obstacles. Ergonomics, 59(7), 884–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1105304
15.
FosterR. J.WhitakerD.ScallyA. J.BuckleyJ. G.ElliottD. B. (2015). What you see is what you step: The horizontal-vertical illusion increases toe clearance in older adults during stair ascent. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 56(5), 2950–2957. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-16018
GloverS. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(1), 3–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000020
19.
GloverS.DixonP. (2002). Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195791
20.
GloverS.DixonP. (2004). A step and a hop on the müller-lyer: Illusion effects on lower-limb movements. Experimental Brain Research, 154(4), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1687-y
21.
GloverS. R.DixonP. (2001). Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.27.3.560
22.
GoodaleM. A.GonzalezC. L.KróliczakG. (2008). Action rules: Why the visual control of reaching and grasping is not always influenced by perceptual illusions. Perception, 37(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5876
JansenS. E.ToetA.WerkhovenP. J. (2011). Obstacle crossing with lower visual field restriction: Shifts in strategy. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2010.533593
25.
MarchantD. C.CarnegieE.WoodG.EllisonP. (2019). Influence of visual illusion and attentional focusing instruction in motor performance. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(6), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2018.1441165
26.
McVeaD. A.PearsonK. G. (2007). Stepping of the forelegs over obstacles establishes long-lasting memories in cats. Current Biology: CB, 17(16), R621–R623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.026
27.
MendozaJ.HansenS.GlazebrookC. M.KeetchK. M.ElliottD. (2005). Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: A multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action. Human Movement Science, 24(5-6), 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.09.002
28.
PatlaA. E.VickersJ. N. (1997). Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?NeuroReport, 8(17), 3661–3665. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199712010-00002
29.
RheaC. K.RietdykS. (2007). Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory. Neuroscience Letters, 418(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.063
30.
RheaC. K.RietdykS.HaddadJ. M. (2010). Locomotor adaptation versus perceptual adaptation when stepping over an obstacle with a height illusion. PLoS One, 5(7), Article e11544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011544
31.
RobinovitchS. N.FeldmanF.YangY.SchonnopR.LeungP. M.SarrafT.Sims-GouldJ.LoughinM. (2013). Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: An observational study. Lancet, 381(9860), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61263-x
32.
RobinsonJ. O. (2013). The psychology of visual illusion. Courier Corporation.
33.
SakuraiR.FujiwaraY.IshiharaM.HiguchiT.UchidaH.ImanakaK. (2013). Age-related self-overestimation of step-over ability in healthy older adults and its relationship to fall risk. BMC Geriatrics, 13(44), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-44
34.
SakuraiR.KodamaK.OzawaY. (2022). Adaptive locomotion during subtle environmental changes in younger and older adults. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 12438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16436-4
35.
SakuraiR.KodamaK.OzawaY.Pieruccini-FariaF.Kobayashi-CuyaK. E.OgawaS. (2021). Association of age-related cognitive and obstacle avoidance performances. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12552. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91841-9
36.
SakuraiR.MiuraY.KodamaK.FujimotoM. (2023). Effect of auditory deprivation on adaptive locomotion: Interaction with lower visual field occlusion. Behavioural Brain Research, 455(114671), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114671
37.
SkervinT. K.ThomasN. M.SchofieldA. J.HollandsM. A.MaganarisC. N.FosterR. J. (2021). The next step in optimising the stair horizontal-vertical illusion: Does a perception-action link exist in older adults?Experimental Gerontology, 149(111309), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2021.111309
38.
TayaS.MiuraK. (2007). Shrinkage in the apparent size of cylindrical objects. Perception, 36(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5597
39.
ThompsonP.MikellidouK. (2011). Applying the Helmholtz illusion to fashion: Horizontal stripes won't make you look fatter. I-Perception, 2(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0405
40.
UccelliS.PisuV.RiggioL.BrunoN. (2019). The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action. Experimental Brain Research, 237(4), 953–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05480-8
41.
WoodG.VineS. J.WilsonM. R. (2013). The impact of visual illusions on perception, action planning, and motor performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(5), 830–834. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0489-y
42.
YamadaM.TanakaH.MoriS.NagaiK.UemuraK.TanakaB.AoyamaT.IchihashiN. (2011). Fallers choose an early transfer gaze strategy during obstacle avoidance in dual-task condition. Aging-Clinical & Experimental Research, 23(4), 316–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03337757
43.
YanS.YeomansM. A.HondzinskiJ. M. (2023). Vertical-horizontal illusory effects with gaze restrictions do not change length estimations using the lower limb. Experimental Brain Research, 241(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06504-6
