We aimed to investigate the influence of interoceptive accuracy on affective valence, arousal, and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during 20 minutes of aerobic exercise at both moderate and heavy intensity among physically inactive men. We divided our participant sample into men with poor heartbeat perception (PHP, n = 13) and good heartbeat perception (GHP, n = 15), based on their cardioceptive accuracy. We measured their heart rate reserve (%HRreserve), perceived affective valence (Feeling Scale; +5/-5), perceived arousal (Felt Arousal Scale, 0–6), and ratings of perceived effort (RPE; Borg scale 6–20) every five minutes during an exercise session on a bicycle ergometer. During moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, the GHP group presented a greater decline in affective valence (p = 0.010; d = 1.06) and a greater increase in RPE (p = 0.004; d = 1.20) compared to the PHP group, with no group differences in %HRreserve (p = 0.590) and arousal (p = 0.629). Psychophysiological and physiological responses to the heavy-intensity aerobic exercise were not different between groups. We concluded that the influence of interoceptive accuracy on psychophysiological responses during submaximal fixed-intensity aerobic exercise was intensity-dependent in these physically inactive men.
AgrícolaP. M. D.MachadoD. G. S.Farias-JuniorL. F.Nascimento-NetoL. I.FontelesA. I.SilvaS. K. A., et al. (2017). Slow down and Enjoy: The effects of cycling cadence on pleasure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124(1), 233–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516672774
2.
AlvesE. D.PanissaV. L. G.BarrosB. J.FranchiniE.TakitoM. Y. (2019). Translation, adaptation, and reproducibility of the physical activity Enjoyment scale (PACES) and feeling scale to Brazilian Portuguese. Sport Sciences for Health, 15(2), 329–336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-018-0516-4
3.
BecharaA.DamasioA. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010
4.
BinderR. K.WonischM.CorraU.Cohen-SolalA.VanheesL.SanerH., et al. (2008). Methodological approach to the first and second lactate threshold in incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, 15(6), 726–734. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e328304fed4
5.
BorgG. A. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 14(5), 377–381.
6.
BoutronI.AltmanD. G.MoherD.SchulzK. F.RavaudP. (2017). CONSORT statement for randomized Trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: A 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167(1), 40. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-0046
7.
CabralL. L.NakamuraF. Y.StefanelloJ. M. F.PessoaL. C. V.SmirmaulB. P. C.PereiraG. (2020). Initial validity and reliability of the Portuguese Borg rating of perceived exertion 6-20 scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 24(2), 103–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2019.1710709
CraigA. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655–666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894
10.
CraigA. D. (2009). How do you feel--now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci, 10(1), 59–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2555
11.
CraigA. D. (2015). How do you feel? An interoceptive moment with your neurobiological self. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
12.
DouradoV. Z.GuerraR. L. F. (2013). Reliability and validity of heart rate variability threshold assessment during an incremental shuttle-walk test in middle-aged and older adults. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 46(2), 194–199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20122376
13.
EdwardsA. M.PolmanR. C. J. (2013). Pacing and awareness: Brain regulation of physical activity. Sports Medicine, 43(11), 1057–1064. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0091-4
14.
EkkekakisP. (2003). Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cognition Emotion, 17(2), 213–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930244000282
15.
EkkekakisP.HallE. E.PetruzzelloS. J. (2005). Variation and homogeneity in affective responses to physical activity of varying intensities: An alternative perspective on dose – response based on evolutionary considerations. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(5), 477–500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021492
16.
EkkekakisP.ParfittG.PetruzzalloS. J.PetruzzelloS. J. (2011). The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: Decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Medicine, 41(8), 641–671. doi: https://doi.org/10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000
17.
EkkekakisP.PetruzzelloS. J. (2002). Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: IV. A conceptual case for the affect circumplex. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(1), 35–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00028-0
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
19.
GaesserG. A.PooleD. C. (1996). The slow component of oxygen uptake kinetics in humans. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 24, 35–71. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8744246
20.
GarberC. E.BlissmerB.DeschenesM. R.FranklinB. A.LamonteM. J.LeeI.-M., et al. (2011). Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 43(7), 1334–1359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb
21.
GarfinkelS. N.SethA. K.BarrettA. B.SuzukiK.CritchleyH. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 65–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004
22.
GarfinkelS. N.TileyC.O’KeeffeS.HarrisonN. A.SethA. K.CritchleyH. D. (2016). Discrepancies between dimensions of interoception in autism: Implications for emotion and anxiety. Biological Psychology, 114, 117–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.12.003
23.
GhoshA. K. (2004). Anaerobic threshold: Its concept and role in endurance sport. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 11(1): 24–36.
24.
HardyC. J.RejeskiW. J. (1989). Not what, but how one feels: The measurement of affect during exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(3), 304–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.11.3.304
25.
HartmanM. E.EkkekakisP.DicksN. D.PettittR. W. (2019). Dynamics of pleasure–displeasure at the limit of exercise tolerance: Conceptualizing the sense of exertional physical fatigue as an affective response. Journal of Experimental Biology, 222(3), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.186585
26.
HerbertB. M.UlbrichP.SchandryR. (2007). Interoceptive sensitivity and physical effort: Implications for the self-control of physical load in everyday life. Psychophysiology, 44(2), 194–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00493.x
27.
HiltyL.LangerN.Pascual-MarquiR.BoutellierU.LutzK. (2011). Fatigue-induced increase in intracortical communication between mid/anterior insular and motor cortex during cycling exercise. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 34(12), 2035–2042. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07909.x
28.
IodiceP.PorcielloG.BufalariI.BarcaL.PezzuloG. (2019). An interoceptive illusion of effort induced by false heart-rate feedback. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(28), 13897–13902. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821032116
29.
JamnickN. A.PettittR. W.GranataC.PyneD. B.BishopD. J. (2020). An Examination and critique of current methods to determine exercise intensity. Sports Medicine, 50(10), 1729–1756. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01322-8
30.
KarapetianG.EngelsH.GretebeckR. (2008). Use of heart rate variability to estimate LT and VT. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(08), 652–657. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-989423
31.
KötelesF.TeufelB.KörmendiJ.FerentziE.SzemerszkyR. (2020). Cardioceptive accuracy is associated with arousal but not with valence and perceived exertion under physical load. Psychophysiology, 57(9), 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13620
32.
LakensD. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
33.
MachadoD. G. S.Farias JuniorL. F.de NascimentoP. H. D.do, TavaresM. P. M.Anselmo da SilvaS. K.AgrícolaP. M. D., et al. (2019). Can interoceptive accuracy influence maximal performance, physiological and perceptual responses to exercise?Physiology and Behavior, 204(January), 234–240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.038
34.
MagraniP.PompeuF. A. M. S. (2010). Equations for predicting aerobic power (VO2) of young Brazilian adults. Arq Bras Cardiol, 94(6), 763–770. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2010005000054
35.
McMorrisT.BarwoodM.CorbettJ. (2018). Central fatigue theory and endurance exercise: Toward an interoceptive model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 93(2010), 93–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.024
36.
MidgleyA. W.CarrollS.MarchantD.McNaughtonL. R.SieglerJ. (2009). Evaluation of true maximal oxygen uptake based on a novel set of standardized criteria. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 34(2), 115–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/H08-146
NoakesT. D. (2011). Time to move beyond a brainless exercise physiology: The evidence for complex regulation of human exercise performance. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 36(1), 23–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/H10-082
39.
PennebakerJ. W.LightnerJ. M. (1980). Competition of internal and external information in an exercise setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 165–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.165
40.
PickS.Rojas-AguiluzM.ButlerM.MulrenanH.NicholsonT. R.GoldsteinL. H. (2020). Dissociation and interoception in functional neurological disorder. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 25(4), 294–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2020.1791061
41.
PollatosO.HerbertB.KaufmannC.AuerD.SchandryR. (2007). Interoceptive awareness, anxiety and cardiovascular reactivity to isometric exercise. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65(2), 167–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.03.005
42.
PollatosO.HerbertB. M.MatthiasE.SchandryR. (2007). Heart rate response after emotional picture presentation is modulated by interoceptive awareness. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(1), 117–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.09.003
43.
PollatosO.KirschW.SchandryR. (2005). On the relationship between interoceptive awareness, emotional experience, and brain processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 948–962. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.019
44.
PollatosO.SchandryR. (2004). Accuracy of heartbeat perception is reflected in the amplitude of the heartbeat-evoked brain potential. Psychophysiology, 41(3), 476–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.2004.00170.x
45.
PriceS.WiechaS.CieślińskiI.ŚliżD.KasiakP. S.LachJ., et al (2022). Differences between treadmill and cycle ergometer cardiopulmonary exercise testing results in triathletes and their association with body composition and body mass index. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3557. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063557
46.
RhodesR. E.KatesA. (2015). Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(5), 715–731.
47.
RobertsonC. V.MarinoF. E. (2016). A role for the prefrontal cortex in exercise tolerance and termination. Journal of Applied Physiology, 120(4), 464–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00363.2015
48.
RobertsonR. J.NobleB. J. (1997). Perception of physical exertion: Methods, mediators, and applications. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 25, 407–452.
49.
RussellJ. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol, 39, 1161–1178.
SchwartzJ.OhP.TakitoM. Y.SaundersB.DolanE.FranchiniE., et al. (2021). Translation, cultural adaptation, and reproducibility of the physical activity readiness questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+): The Brazilian Portuguese version. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 8(July), 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.712696
52.
SvebakS.MurgatroydS. (1985). Metamotivational domance: A multimethod validation of reversal theory constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 107–116.
53.
SwainD. P.LeutholtzB. C.KingM. E.HaasL. A.BranchJ. D. (1998). Relationship between % heart rate reserve and % VO2 reserve in treadmill exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30(2), 318–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199802000-00022
54.
TarvainenM. P.LipponenJ. A.KarjalainenP. A. (2009). Kubios HRV – a software for advanced heart rate variability analysis. IFMBE Proccedings, 22(3), 1022–1025.
55.
Task Force of The European Society of Cardiology and The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. (1996). Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation, 93(5), 1043–1065. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043
56.
UlmerH. V. (1996). Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback. Experientia, 52(5), 416–420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01919309
57.
Wallman-JonesA.PerakakisP.TsakirisM.SchmidtM. (2021). Physical activity and interoceptive processing: Theoretical considerations for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 166(May), 38–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.05.002
58.
YuanH.YanH. M.XuX. G.HanF.YanQ. (2007). Effect of heartbeat perception on heartbeat evoked potential waves. Neuroscience Bulletin, 23(6), 357–362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-007-0053-7
