As predictive motor control is an important index of neuromotor development and maturation, we developed two touchscreen tablet-based tests of this function. Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of both a rapid manual interception test and a pursuit tracking test, using a sample of 124 children (62 boys and 62 girls) from two age groups (7-8-year-oldss and 9–10-year-olds). Participants performed both tablet tests with a stylus (sample rate 100 Hz) with both a visible and a temporarily invisible moving target. Confirmatory factor analyses and omega coefficients showed that both tests were univariate methods that provided a reliable assessment of the latent factor related to predictive visuomotor control. As would be expected, compared to younger children, older children performed better on both manual interception and pursuit tracking. The correlations between the latent factors of the two tests at 95% confidence intervals (−.276, −.608) suggested shared variance. Thus, the touchscreen-tablet based tests of rapid manual interception and manual pursuit tracking appear psychometrically suitable for assessing the neuromotor ability of predictive control in 7-10-year-old children.
AdamsI. L. J.LustJ. M.WilsonP. H.SteenbergenB. (2017). Testing predictive control of movement in children with DCD using converging operations. British Journal of Psychology, 108(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12183
2.
BennettC.CullinaneM.BennettsS. K.LoveJ.HackworthN. J.MensahF. K.ReillyS.NicholsonJ. M.WestruppE. M. (2020). Tablet-based adaptation and administration of the Castles and Coltheart Reading Test 2 for a large longitudinal study. Plos One, 15(9), e0239420. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239420
3.
BertuccoM.SangerT. D. (2014). Speed-accuracy testing on the Apple iPad® provides a quantitative test of upper extremity motor performance in children with dystonia. Journal of Child Neurology, 29(11), 1460–1466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073813494265jcn.sagepub.com
4.
BignardiG.DalmaijerE. S.Anwyl-IrvineA.AstleD. E. (2020). Collecting big data with small screens: Group tests of children’s cognition with touchscreen tablets are reliable and valid. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1515–1529. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01503-3
5.
BuszardT.WhitesideD.KrauseL.ReidM. (2021). Formalising a hypothesis for the development of anticipatory skill in time-constrained interceptive actions: Implications for the design of junior sport. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101933
6.
ChiuK.LewisF. C.AshtonR.CornishK. M.JohnsonK. A. (2022). Higher tablet use is associated with better sustained attention performance but poorer sleep quality in school-aged children. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742468
7.
ChuV.KrishnanK. (2022). Quantitative assessment of prewriting skills in children: The development and validity of a tablet assessment tool. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 129(3), 554–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125221087802
8.
ChuaY. W.LuS. C.AnzulewiczA.SobotaK.TachtatzisC.AndonovicI.RoweP.Delafield-ButtJ. (2022). Developmental differences in the prospective organisation of goal-directedmovement between children with autism and typically developing children: A smart tablet serious game study. Developmental Science, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13195
9.
DerikxD. F. A. A.SchoemakerM. M. (2020). The nature of coordination and control problems in children with developmental coordination disorder during ball catching: A systematic review. Human Movement Science, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102688
10.
DesmurgetM.GraftonS. (2003). Feedback or feedforward control: End of a dichotomy. In Johnson-FreyS. H. (Ed), (pp. 289–338). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
11.
EgoC.YükselD.de XivryJ.-J. O.LefèvreP. (2016). Development of internal models and predictive abilities for visual tracking during childhood. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 115(1), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00534.2015
12.
GianmarcoE.Di SanoS.AureliT.CerrattiP.Fanò-IllicG.PietrangeloT. (2016). Psychological and physiological processes in figure-tracing abilities measured using a tablet computer: A study with 7 and 9 years old children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. Article 1528https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01528
13.
HendersonS. E.SugdenD. A.BarnettA. L. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children-2. London: Pearson Assessment.
14.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
15.
HydeC. E.WilsonP. H. (2013). Impaired online control in children with developmental coordination disorder reflects developmental immaturity. Developmental Neuropsychology, 38(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2012.718820
16.
JenkinsA.LindsayS.EslambolchilarP.ThorntonI. M.TalesA. (2016). Administering cognitive tests through touch screen tablet devices: Potential issues. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 54(3), 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160545
17.
JinY.-R.LinL.-Y. (2022). Relationship between touchscreen tablet usage time and attention performance in young children. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891995
18.
JonesP. R.TigchelaarI.DemariaG.WilsonI.BiW.TaylorD. J.CrabbD. P. (2020). Refinement and preliminary evaluation of two tablet-based tests of real-world visual function. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 40(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12658
KagererF. A.ClarkJ. E. (2015). Development of kinesthetic-motor and auditory-motor representations in school-aged children. Experimental Brain Research, 233(7), 2181–2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4288-7
21.
KashiwagiM.IwakiS.NarumiY.TamaiH.SuzukiS. (2009). Parietal dysfunction in developmental coordination disorder: A functional MRI study. Neuroreport, 20(15), 1319–1324. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832f4d87
22.
MartzogP.SuggateS. P. (2022). Screen media are associated with fine motor skill development in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60, 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.03.010
MilesC. A. L.WoodG.VineVickersS. J.J. N.WilsonM. R. (2017). Quiet eye training aids the long-term learning of throwing and catching in children: Preliminary evidence for a predictive control strategy. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2015.112209
25.
MullikenG. H.MusallamS.AndersenR. A. (2008). Forward estimation of movement state in posterior parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(24), 8170–8177.
26.
PanchukD.VickersJ. N. (2009). Using spatial occlusion to explore the control strategies used in rapid interceptive actions: Predictive or prospective control?Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(12), 1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903156449
27.
RosseelY. (2012). Iavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
28.
RuddockS.PiekJ.SugdenD.MorrisS.HydeC.CaeyenberghsK.WilsonP. (2015). Coupling online control and inhibitory systems in children with developmental coordination disorder: Goal-directed reaching. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 244-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.013
29.
SalmanM. S.SharpeJ. A.LillakasL.DennisM.SteinbachM. J. (2006). Smooth pursuit eye movements in children. Experimental Brain Research, 169(1), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0292-7
30.
SchallertW.FluetM. C.KesselringJ.KoolJ. (2020). Evaluation of upper limb function with digitizing tablet-based tests: Reliability and discriminative validity in healthy persons and patients with neurological disorders. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(8), 1465–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1800838
31.
SchneibergS.SveistrupH.McFadyenB.McKinleyP.LevinM. F. (2002). The development of coordination for reach-to-grasp movements in children. Experimental Brain Research, 146(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1156-z
32.
SripadaC. S.KesslerD.AngstadtM. (2014). Lag in maturation of the brain’s intrinsic functional architecture in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(39), 14259–14264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407787111
33.
TrifunovićA.ČičevićS.PešićD.SamčovićA.MarkovićV. (2022). Surveying disadvantaged children’s traffic safety education in a comparison between paper and electronic methods: A case example for the expanded use of educational technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221106477
34.
Van BraeckelK.ButcherP. R.GeuzeR. H.StremmelaarE. F.BoumaA. (2007). Movement adaptations in 7- to 10-year-old typically developing children: Evidence for a transition in feedback-based motor control. Human Movement Science, 26(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.010
35.
Van RoonD.CaeyenberghsK.SwinnenS. P.Smits-EngelsmanB. C. (2008). Development of feedforward control in a dynamic manual tracking task. Child Development, 79(4), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01163.x
36.
WilsonP. H.RuddockS.Smits-EngelsmanB.PolatajkoH.BlankR. (2013). Understanding performance deficits in developmental coordination disorder: A meta-analysis of recent research. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 55(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04436.x
37.
WolpertD. M.GhahramaniZ.JordanM. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269(5232), 1880–1882. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7569931
38.
XuY.WangX.PeckC.GoldbergM. E. (2011). The time course of the tonic oculomotor proprioceptive signal in area 3a of somatosensory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00668.2010
