Our purpose in this study was to examine the effectiveness of yoga to address multiple risk factors of falling in active and low active older adults. Community–dwelling older adults (N = 35) over the age of 65 actively participated in either a yoga program, an exercise program, or a no–program control. Participants completed measures associated with falling risks. Physical measures included lower body strength, static balance, and lower body flexibility. Psychological measures included perceived self-efficacy with respect to falls and health–related quality of life. We determined between–group differences using planned comparisons, effect size, confidence intervals, and probability of superiority. Results of planned comparisons and practical significance testing indicated that yoga participants scored higher than the exercise and control participants on both right and left lower body flexibility tests. Yoga participants also scored higher than the control participants on right leg static balance, and the right and left lower body flexibility tests. The exercise participants scored higher than yoga participants on the RAND-36 Quality of Life subscales of Energy/Fatigue, Pain, and General Health. The probability of superiority results indicated that the no–program older adult participants would benefit by enrolling in the yoga rather than the exercise program to reduce physical risks of falling. These findings were discussed in relation to promoting physical activity programs to reduce risks of falling, and the roles of the protocol, practical significance, and measures employed when determining program effectiveness.
BergK.Wood-DauphineeS.WilliamsJ. I. (1995). The balance scale: Reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 27(1), 27–36.
2.
BongueB.DupréC.BeauchetO.RossatA.FantinoB.ColvezA. (2011). A screening tool with five risk factors was developed for fall–risk prediction in community–dwelling elderly. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(10), 1152–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.014
3.
BotnerE. M.MillerW. C.EngJ. J. (2005). Measurement properties of the activities specific balance confidence scale among individuals with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(4), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400008982
4.
BurtonA. W.DavisW. E. (1992). Assessing balance in adapted physical education: Fundamental concepts and applications. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9(1), 14–46. https://doi/10.1123/apaq.9.1.14
ChenK. MTsengW. S. (2008). Pilot–testing the effects of a newly–developed silver yoga exercise program for female seniors. Journal of Nursing Research, 16(1), 37–46. https://doi/10.1097/01.jnr.0000387288.76430.bb
7.
CheungC.WymanJ. F.BronasU.McCarthyT.RudserK.MathiasonM. A. (2017). Managing knee osteoarthritis with yoga or aerobic/strengthening exercise programs in older adults: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology International, 37(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296–016–3620–2
8.
ChoK. H.BokS. K.KimY. J.HwangS. L. (2012). Effect of lower limb strength on falls and balance of the elderly. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(3), 386–393. http://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.3.386
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
DelbaereK.CloseJ. C. T.MikolaizakA. S.SachdevP. S.BrodatyH.LordS. R. (2010). The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age and Ageing, 39(2), 210–216. https://doi/10.1093/ageing/afp225
12.
DipietroL.CampbellW. W.BuchnerD. M.EricksonK. I.PowellK. E.BloodgoodB.HughesT., DayK. R., PiercyK. L., Vaux–BjerkeA., & OlsonR. D. (2019). Physical activity, injurious falls, and physical function in aging: An umbrella review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 51(6), 1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001942
13.
EllisP. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta–analysis, and the interpretation of research results. University Press. https://doi/10.1017/CBO9780511761676
14.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
15.
GrissomR. J. (1994). Probability of the superior outcome of one treatment over another. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 314–316. https://doi/10.1037/0021–9010.79.2.314
16.
GuralnikJ. M.SimonsickE. M.FerrucciLGlynnR. J.BerkmanL. F.BlazerD. G.ScherrP.A., & WallaceR. B. (1994). A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. Journal of Gerontology, 49(2), M85–M94. https://doi/10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85
17.
HakimM. R.KotrobaE.CoursJ.TeelS.LeiningerP. M. (2010). A cross–sectional study of balance–related measures with older adults who participated in tai chi, yoga, or no exercise. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 28(1), 63–74. https://doi/10.3109/02703181003605861
18.
HaysR. D.MoralesL. S. (2001). The RAND–36 measure of health–related quality of life. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 350–357. https://doi/10.3109/07853890109002089
19.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
20.
IyengarB. K. S. (1989). The tree of yoga. Shambhala Publications.
21.
JonesC. J.RikliR. E.MaxJ.NoffalG. (1998). The reliability and validity of a chair sit-and-reach test as a measure of hamstring flexibility in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(4), 338–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1998.10607708
22.
LasaterJ. H. (2016). Relax and renew: Restful yoga for stressful times. Shambhala Publications.
23.
LusardiM. M.FritzS.MiddletonA.AllisonL.WingoodM.PhillipsE.CrissM., OsborneJ., & ChuiK. K. (2017). Determining risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta–analysis using posttest probability. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 40(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000099
24.
Marques–VieiraC.SousaL. M.SeverinoS. S.SousaL.CaldeiraS. (2016). Cross–cultural validation of the falls efficacy scale international in elderly. Journal of Clinical Gerontology & Geriatrics, 7(3), 72–76. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcgg.2015.12.002
25.
MichikawaT.NishiwakiY.TakebayashiT.ToyamaY. (2009). One–leg standing test for elderly populations. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 14(9), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776–009–1371–6
26.
MorelandB.KakaraR.HenryA. (2020). Trends in nonfatal falls and fall–related injuries among adults aged ≥65 years–United States 2012–2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(27), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6927a5
27.
MotlR. W.DishmanR. K.SaundersR.DowdaM.FeltonG.PateR. R. (2001). Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 21(2), 110–117. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00326-9
NoradechanuntC.WorsleyA.GroellerH. (2017). Thai yoga improves physical function and well–being in older adults: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Science Medicine and Sport, 20(5), 494–501. https://doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.10.007
30.
OkenB. S.ZajdelD.KishiyamaS.FlegalK.DehenC.HaasM.KraemerD. F., LawrenceJ., & LeyvaJ. (2006). Randomized, controlled, six–month trial of yoga in healthy seniors: Effects on cognition and quality of life. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 12(1), 40–47.
31.
RikliR. E.JonesC. J. (1999). Functional fitness normative scores for community–residing older adults, ages 60–94. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.7.2.162
32.
SchmidA. A.Van PuymbroeckM.AltenburgerP. A.SchalkN. L.DierksT. A.MillerK. K.DamushT. M., BravataD. M., & WilliamsL. S. (2012). Post-stroke balance improves with yoga: A pilot study. Stroke, 43(9), 2402–2407. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.658211
33.
ShermanK. J. (2012). Guidelines for developing yoga interventions for randomized trials. Evidence–Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2021, Article 143271. https://doi/10.1155/2012/143271
34.
SivaramakrishnanD.FitzsimonsC.KellyP.LudwigK.MutrieN.SaundersD. H.BakerG. (2019). The effects of yoga compared to active and inactive controls on physical function and health related quality of life in older adults–systematic review and meta–analysis of randomised controlled trials. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966–019–0789–2
35.
SmetsE. M.GarssenB.BonkeB.De HaesJ. C. (1995). Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. Psychosomatic Research, 39(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o
36.
TiedemannA.O’RourkeS.SestoR.SherringtonC. (2013). A 12–week Iyengar yoga program improved balance and mobility in older community–dwelling people: A pilot randomized controlled trial. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 68(9), 1068–1075. https://doi/10.1093/gerona/glt087
37.
VanderZeeK. I.SandermanR.HeyinkJ. W.de HaesH. (1996). Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36–item health survey 1.0: A multidimensional measure of general health status. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 3(2), 104–122. https://doi/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0302_2
WareJ. E.KosinskiM.KellerS. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233. https://doi/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
40.
WareJ. E.SherbourneC. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
41.
WilliamsL. S.WeinbergerM.HarrisL. E.ClarkD. O.BillerJ. (1999). Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 30(7), 1362–1369. https://doi/10.1161/01.str.30.7.1362
42.
YardleyL.BeyerN.HauerK.KempenG.Piot–ZieglerC.ToddC. (2005). Development and initial validation of the falls efficacy scale–international (FES-I). Age and Ageing, 34(6), 614–619. https://doi/10.1093/ageing/afi196
