While people may experience mixed emotions when confronting a meaningful ending; it is unclear how much an ending’s meaningfulness contributes to evoking these mixed emotions. This study examined, among Japanese undergraduate students, whether different degrees of meaningfulness of an ending affected emotional experiences, and how time passage changed emotional intensity. Sixty-one Japanese students (37 females, 24 males; M age = 20.75, SD = 0.80) reported their emotional experiences and the degree of meaningfulness they assigned to the ending of the Heisei era at two time points-before and after the ending. As expected, participants who placed high meaningfulness to the ending of the Heisei era experienced a high level of mixed emotions, indicating that the degree of meaningfulness given to an ending can modulate emotional experiences. Furthermore, the specific emotions experienced (i.e., sadness or happiness) differed depending on the assessment time point, such that the meaningfulness of the ending played a key role in producing mixed emotional experiences in this sample.
BaumeisterR.F.VohsK.D. (2002). The pursuit of meaningfulness in life. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 608-618). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BuehlerR.McFarlandC. (2001). Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1480–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711009
3.
Ersner-HershfieldH.MikelsJ. A.SullivanS. J.CarstensenL. L. (2008). Poignancy: Mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.158
4.
HansenC. H.HansenR. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.917
5.
ItoT. A.LarsenJ. T.SmithN. K.CacioppoJ. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. [Miscellaneous article]. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.887
LarsenJ. T.HershfieldH. E.StastnyB. J.HesterN. (2017). On the relationship between positive and negative affect: Their correlation and their co-occurrence. Emotion, 17(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000231
8.
LarsenJ. T.McGrawA. P. (2014). The case for mixed emotions: mixed emotions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(6), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12108
9.
LarsenJ. T.Peter McGrawA.MellersB. A.CacioppoJ. T. (2004). The agony of victory and thrill of defeat: mixed emotional reactions to disappointing wins and relieving losses. Psychological Science, 15(5), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00677.x
10.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York; Springer.
11.
LeventhalH.DiefenbachM.LeventhalE. A. (1992). Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive therapy and Research, 16(2), 143–163.
12.
MiyamotoY.MaX.WilkenB. (2017). Cultural variation in pro-positive versus balanced systems of emotions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.014
Nolen-HoeksemaS.DavisC. G. (2002). Positive responses to loss: Perceiving benefits and growth. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 598 -606). Oxford University Press.
15.
PrattoF.JohnO. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380
16.
SchererK. R.MoorsA. (2019). The emotion process: event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 719–745. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854
17.
SchimmackU. (2001). Pleasure, displeasure, and mixed feelings: Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive?Cognition & Emotion, 15(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930126097
18.
SedikidesC.WildschutT.ArndtJ.RoutledgeC. (2008). Nostalgia: Past, present, and future. Current directions in psychological science, 17(5), 304–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00595.x
19.
ShiraiM.SuzukiN. (2013). The classification and structures of situations eliciting sadness. Japanese Journal of Research on Emotions, 20(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.4092/jsre.20.105
20.
SmithN. K.CacioppoJ. T.LarsenJ. T.ChartrandT. L. (2003). May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00147-1
21.
Spencer-RodgersJ.PengK.WangL. (2010). Dialecticism and the Co-occurrence of positive and negative emotions Across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109349508
22.
WildschutT.SedikidesC.ArndtJ.RoutledgeC. (2006). Nostalgia: content, triggers, functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 975–993. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.975
