In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of visual realism on soccer players’ memorization of soccer tactics according to their level of expertise and visuospatial abilities. We divided 48 volunteers into novice and expert soccer players and had them first perform a multitask visuospatial abilities (VSA) test and then undergo training with three dynamic soccer scenes, each presented with varied levels of realism (schematic, moderately realistic, and highly realistic). We then tested players’ memorization and reproduction of the soccer scenes and measured their visual processing with eye-tracking glasses to identify their cognitive processes during memorization. We found that reducing visual realism improved visual processing and memorization when compared to higher realism (p < .001). Second, both higher (vs. lower) player expertise and higher (vs. lower) VSA influenced visual processing and enhanced memorization efficiency (p < .001). Third, there were significant interaction effects between visual realism, player expertise, and player VSA (p < .001) such that players with high VSA benefited more from reduced (vs. accentuated) visual realism than did players with low VSA. Thus, increasing visual realism can hinder tactical learning effectiveness, especially for learners who lack domain expertise and visuospatial abilities. Practically speaking, coaches and educators might improve their communications by tailoring tactical instructions to learners’ cognitive skills.
BarakM.AshkarT.DoriY. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: its effect on students' thinking and motivation. Computers & Education, 56(3), Article 839e846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.025
BediouB.AdamsD. M.MayerR. E.TiptonE.GreenC. S.BavelierD. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000130
4.
Ben MahfoudhH.ZoudjiB. (2020). The role of visuospatial abilities in memorizing animations among soccer players. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 15(1). Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2020-0002
5.
Ben MahfoudhH.ZoudjiB. (2021). The role of visuospatial abilities and the level of expertise in memorising soccer animations. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.1940240
6.
Ben MahfoudhH.ZoudjiB.Ait El CadiA. (2021). The effects of visual realism and visuospatial abilities on memorizing soccer tactics. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 16(1), Article 20210007. https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2021-0007
7.
BerneyS.BétrancourtM.MolinariG.HoyekN. (2015). How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(5), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1524
8.
BoucheixJ.-M.LoweR. K.PutriD. K.GroffJ. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.005
9.
BramsS.ZivG.LevinO.SpitzJ.WagemansJ.WilliamsA. M.HelsenW. F. (2019). The relationship between gaze behavior, expertise, and performance: A systematic review. Psychological Bulletin, 145(10), 980–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000207
10.
BruckerB.ScheiterK.GerjetsP. (2014). Learning with dynamic and static visualizations: Realistic details only benefit learners with high visuospatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.077
11.
BurnsA.-M.KulpaR.DurnyA.SpanlangB.SlaterM.MultonF. (2011). Using virtual humans and computer animations to learn complex motor skills: a case study in karate. BIO Web of Conferences, 1, 00012. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20110100012
12.
Castro-AlonsoJ. C.AyresP.WongM.PaasF. (2019). Visuospatial tests and multimedia learning. In Tindall-FordS.AgostinhoS.SwellerJ. (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory (pp. 89–100). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429283895-8
ChenY.-C.YangF.-Y. (2014). Probing the relationship between process of spatial problems solving and science learning: An eye tracking approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9504-y
15.
ÇöltekinA.FranceletR.RichterK.-F.ThoresenJ.FabrikantS. I. (2017). The effects of visual realism, spatial abilities, and competition on performance in map-based route learning in men. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2017.1344569
16.
CronbachL. J.SnowR. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Irvington.
17.
D’oliveiraT. C. (2004). Dynamic spatial ability: An exploratory analysis and a confirmatory study. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap1401_2
18.
EcclesD. W.TranK. B. (2012). Getting them on the same page: Strategies for enhancing coordination and communication in sports teams. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 3(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2011.649229
19.
EisenbergM. L.ZacksJ. M. (2016). Ambient and focal visual processing of naturalistic activity. Journal of Vision, 16(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.2.5
20.
EkstromR. B.DermenD.HarmanH. H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests (Vol. 102). Educational testing service.
21.
EricssonK. A. (2018). Superior working memory in experts. In EricssonK. A.HoffmanR. R.KozbeltA.WilliamsA. M. (Éds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 696–713). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.036
22.
FordP. R.CoughlanE. K.HodgesN. J.WilliamsA. M. (2015). Deliberate practice in sport. In BakerJ.FarrowD. (Eds.),Routledge handbook of sport expertise (pp. 347–362). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776675-30
23.
GegenfurtnerA.LehtinenE.SäljöR. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 523–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7
24.
HegartyM. (2004). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations. In BlackwellA.MarriottK.ShimojimaA. (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference. (pp. 1–13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25931-2_1
25.
HegartyM.KrizS. (2008). Effects of knowledge and spatial ability on learning from animation. In LoweR.SchnotzW. (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 3–29). Cambridge University Press.
26.
HegartyM.KrizS.CateC. (2003). The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2104_1
27.
HegartyM.SimsV. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22(4), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200867
28.
HegartyM.WallerD. A. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In ShahP.MiyakeA. (Éds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (1st ed., pp. 121–169). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610448.005
29.
HöfflerT. N. (2010). Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations—a Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9126-7
30.
HöfflerT. N.LeutnerD. (2011). The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations–Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.042
31.
HohmannT.ObelöerH.SchlapkohlN.RaabM. (2015). Does training with 3D videos improve decision-making in team invasion sports?Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(8), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1069380
HuntE.PellegrinoJ. W.FrickR. W.FarrS. A.AldertonD. (1988). The ability to reason about movement in the visual field. Intelligence, 12(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(88)90024-4
34.
IacobucciD.PosavacS. S.KardesF. R.SchneiderM. J.PopovichD. L. (2015a). The median split: Robust, refined, and revived. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.06.014
35.
IacobucciD.PosavacS. S.KardesF. R.SchneiderM. J.PopovichD. L. (2015b). Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.12.002
36.
IdaH.FukuharaK.IshiiM. (2012). Recognition of tennis serve performed by a digital player: Comparison among polygon, shadow, and stick-figure models. PLoS ONE, 7(3), Article e33879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033879
KhacharemA.ZoudjiB.KalyugaS. (2015). Perceiving versus inferring movements to understand dynamic events: The influence of content complexity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 19, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.03.004
39.
KhacharemA.ZoudjiB.RipollH. (2013). Effect of presentation format and expertise on attacking-drill memorization in soccer. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2012.718312
40.
KrizS.HegartyM. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(11), 911–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005
41.
LaiM.-L.TsaiM.-J.YangF.-Y.HsuC.-Y.LiuT.-C.LeeS. W.-Y.LeeM.-H.ChiouG.-L.LiangJ.-C.TsaiC.-C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001
42.
LexH.EssigK.KnoblauchA.SchackT. (2015). Cognitive representations and cognitive processing of team-specific tactics in soccer. PloS one, 10(2), Article e0118219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118219
43.
LinnM. C.PetersenA. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467
44.
LohmanD. F. (1979). Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the Correlational literature (No. TR-8). Stanford Univ Calif School of Education.
45.
LoweR.BoucheixJ. M. (2008). Learning from animated diagrams: How are mental models built? In International conference on theory and application of diagrams, Herrsching, Germany, September, 19-21, 2008 (pp. 266–281). Springer.
46.
LoweR. K.SchnotzW. (2014). Animation principles in multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
47.
LowrieT.LoganT.RamfulA. (2017). Visuospatial training improves elementary students’ mathematics performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12142
48.
LucasT. (2019). Exploring the effect of realism at the cognitive stage of complex motor skill learning. E-learning and Digital Media, 16(4), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019835893
MilesH. C.PopS. R.WattS. J.LawrenceG. P.JohnN. W. (2012). A review of virtual environments for training in ball sports. Computers & Graphics, 36(6), 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2012.04.007
51.
NegiS.MitraR. (2020). Fixation duration and the learning process: An eye tracking study with subtitled videos. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(6), 1. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.6.1
52.
OuwehandK.KroefA. v. d.WongJ.PaasF. (2021). Measuring cognitive load: Are there more valid alternatives to likert rating scales?Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 702616. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.702616
53.
PaasF.TuovinenJ. E.TabbersH.Van GervenP. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3801_8
54.
ParkB.KorbachA.BrünkenR. (2015). Do learner characteristics moderate the seductive-details-effect? A cognitive-load-study using eye-tracking. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 24–36.
55.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1956). The child’s conception of space. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
56.
PlassJ. L.HomerB. D.HaywardE. O. (2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9011-x
57.
PloetznerR.BerneyS.BétrancourtM. (2020). A review of learning demands in instructional animations: The educational effectiveness of animations unfolds if the features of change need to be learned. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 838–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12476
58.
PopluG.RipollH.MavromatisS.BaratginJ. (2008). How do expert soccer players encode visual information to make decisions in simulated game situations?Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(3), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599503
59.
PutK.WagemansJ.SpitzJ.GallardoM. A.WilliamsA. M.HelsenW. F. (2014). The use of 2D and 3D information in a perceptual-cognitive judgement task. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(18), 1688–1697. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.912760
60.
RoachV. A.FraserG. M.KryklywyJ. H.MitchellD. G. V.WilsonT. D. (2017). Different perspectives: Spatial ability influences where individuals look on a timed spatial test: Spatial ability influences timed test performance. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(3), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1654
61.
Sáiz-ManzanaresM. C.PérezI. R.RodríguezA. A.ArribasS. R.AlmeidaL.MartinC. F. (2021). Analysis of the learning process through eye tracking technology and feature selection techniques. Applied Sciences, 11(13), 6157. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136157
SchnotzW.LoweR. K. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In LoweR.SchnotzW. (Eds.), Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, (pp. 304–356). Cambridge University Press.
64.
SchorerJ.SchapschröerM.FischerL.HabbenJ.BakerJ. (2018). An augmented perceptual-cognitive intervention using a pattern recall paradigm with junior soccer players. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01260
65.
SmeetonN. J.WardP.WilliamsA. M. (2004). Do pattern recognition skills transfer across sports? A preliminary analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410310001641494
66.
SpenceI.FengJ. (2010). Video games and spatial cognition. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019491
67.
SuhJ.ChoJ. Y. (2020). Linking spatial ability, spatial strategies, and spatial creativity: A step to clarify the fuzzy relationship between spatial ability and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100628
68.
SwannC.MoranA.PiggottD. (2015). Defining elite athletes: Issues in the study of expert performance in sport psychology. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16(part 1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.07.004
69.
SwellerJ.van MerriënboerJ. J. G.PaasF. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
70.
TuovinenJ. E.PaasF. (2004). Exploring multidimensional approaches to the efficiency of instructional conditions. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:truc.0000021813.24669.62
71.
TürkayS. (2016). The effects of whiteboard animations on retention and subjective experiences when learning advanced physics topics. Computers & Education, 98, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.004
72.
UttalD. H.CohenC. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and stem education: When, why, and how? In RossB. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 147–181). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2
73.
UttalD. H.MeadowN. G.TiptonE.HandL. L.AldenA. R.WarrenC.NewcombeN. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
74.
VandenbergS. G.KuseA. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
75.
WangL. (2017). Various spatial skills, gender differences, and transferability of spatial skills. In KhineM. S. (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education (pp. 85–105). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_5
76.
WilliamsA. M.HodgesN. J. (2005). Practice, instruction and skill acquisition in soccer: Challenging tradition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(6), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021328
77.
YoungB. W.EcclesD. W.WilliamsA. M.BakerJ. (2021). K. Anders Ericsson, deliberate practice, and sport: Contributions, collaborations, and controversies. Journal of Expertise, 4(2), 169–189.
