The bizarreness effect on object recognition is a strong phenomenon, but its influence has been inconsistent for bizarre object color. In this study, we manipulated three factors in separate experiments to determine whether a color bizarreness effect on object recognition memory would occur and, if not, why. Participants first saw (i.e., learned) object pictures that were either bizarrely or typically colored; they then completed a recognition memory test. In three experiments, we then manipulated (a) degree of color bizarreness (Experiment 1), (b) the orientation task (Experiment 2), and (c) additional demands for object identification (Experiment 3). In Experiment 1, we provided 49 undergraduate participants with object pictures whose colors were typical, moderately atypical, or bizarre and found no color bizarreness effect on recognition memory even for extremely bizarre colors. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the orientation task in that 28 young adult participants expressed their preferences for the pictures on a three-point scale while another 28 participants judged how natural the pictures were. Each orientation task group better recognized typically-colored rather than bizarrely-colored objects (typicality effect). In Experiment 3, we asked 27 young adults to identify the objects during the learning phase to ensure that they paid attention to the objects’ bizarre colors; recognition memory was then unaffected by either color bizarreness or typicality. Thus, despite a general bizarreness effect in recognition memory, bizarre colors are less likely to influence object recognition memory.
Anwyl-IrvineA. L.MassonniéJ.FlittonA.KirkhamN.EvershedJ. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
2.
BeinO.LivnehN.ReggevN.GileadM.Goshen-GottsteinY.MarilA. (2015). Delineating the effect of semantic congruency on episodic memory: The role of integration and relatedness. PLoS One, 10(2), e0115624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115624
BiretaT. J.SurprenantA. M.NeathI. (2008). Age-related differences in the Von Restorff isolation effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 61(3), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701626608
6.
BrodG.LindenbergerU.Werkle-BergnerM.ShingY. L. (2015). Differences in the neural signature of remembering schema-congruent and schema-incongruent events. NeuroImage, 117, 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.086
7.
CornoldiC.CavedonA.De BeniR.Pra BaldiA. (1988). The influence of the nature of material and of mental operations on the occurrence of the bizarreness effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 40(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748808402283
8.
CycowiczY. M.NesslerD.HortonC.FriedmanD. (2008). Retrieving object colour: The influence of colour congruity and test format. Neuroreport, 19(14), 1387–1390. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32830c8df1
9.
Dos SantosM. A.MorenoF. C.Crespo-HervasJ. (2019). Influence of perceived and effective congruence on recall and purchase intention in sponsored printed sports advertising: An eye-tracking application. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 20, 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-10-2018-0099
10.
DuncanK.CurtisC.DavachiL. (2009). Distinct memory signatures in the hippocampus: Intentional states distinguish match and mismatch enhancement signals. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 29(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2998-08.2009
11.
EmmerichH.AckermanB. (1979). A test of bizarre interaction as a factor in children's memory. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 134(2), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1979.10534057
12.
GeraciL.ManzanoI. (2010). Distinctive items are salient at encoding: Delayed judgments of learning predict the isolation effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 63(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902790161
13.
GeraciL.RajaramS. (2004). The distinctiveness effect in the absence of conscious recollection: Evidence from conceptual priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.002
14.
GeraciL.McDanielM. A.ManzanoI.RoedigerH. L. (2009). The influence of age on memory for distinctive events. Memory & Cognition, 37(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.2.175
15.
GeraciL.McDanielM. A.MillerT. M.HughesM. L. (2013). The bizarreness effect: Evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes. Memory & Cognition, 41(8), 1228–1237. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0335-4
16.
GhoshV. E.MoscovitchM.Melo ColellaB.GilboaA. (2014). Schema representation in patients with ventromedial PFC lesions. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 34(36), 12057–12070. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0740-14.2014
17.
GoundenY.CerrotiF.NicolasS. (2017). Secondary distinctiveness effects: Orthographic distinctiveness and bizarreness effects make independent contributions to memory performance. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12338
18.
GoundenY.NicolasS. (2012a). The impact of processing time on the bizarreness and orthographic distinctiveness effects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(4), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00945.x
19.
GoundenY.NicolasS. (2012b). Ageing and secondary-distinctiveness-based effects: The orthographic distinctiveness effect is more robust than the bizarreness effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 65(9), 1820–1832. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.673630
20.
HuntR. R.LambC. A. (2001). What causes the isolation effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1359
21.
KawakamiM. (2008). The effect of color typicality on line drawing memory task. The Human Science Research Bulletin, 7, 83–90. http://id.nii.ac.jp/1072/00004103/
22.
LaPointeM. R. P.MillikenB. (2016). Semantically incongruent objects attract eye gaze when viewing scenes for change. Visual Cognition, 24(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1185070
23.
LawsK.HunterM. Z. (2006). The impact of colour, spatial resolution, and presentation speed on category naming. Brain and Cognition, 62(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.002
24.
LuA.XuG.JinH.MoL.ZhangJ.ZhangJ. X. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence for effects of color knowledge in object recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 469(3), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.039
McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory: The importance of distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.54
27.
McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O.DeLoshE. L.MayC. P.BradyP. (1995). The bizarreness effect: It’s not surprising, it’s complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(2), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.422
MichelonP.SnyderA. Z.BucknerR. L.McAvoyM.ZacksJ. M. (2003). Neural correlates of incongruous visual information: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1612–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S10538119(03)00111-3
31.
MillerE. K.DesimoneR. (1994). Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. Science (New York, N.Y.), 263(5146), 520–522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8290960
32.
Morita, A., & Kambara, T. (2021). Color bizarreness effects in object memory: Evidence from a recall test and eye-tracking. Color Research and Application. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22697
33.
NakoR.SmithT. J.EimerM. (2016). The role of color in search templates for real-world target objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(11), 1714–1727. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00996
NicolasS.WorthenJ. B. (2009). Adult age differences in memory for distinctive information: Evidence from the bizarreness effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 62(10), 1983–1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902725738
36.
PackardP. A.Rodríguez-FornellsA.BunzeckN.NicolásB.de Diego-BalaguerR.FuentemillaL. (2017). Semantic congruence accelerates the onset of the neural signals of successful memory encoding. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 37(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1622-16.2016
37.
PilelieneL.GrigaliunaiteV. (2016). Influence of print advertising layout complexity on visual attention. Eurasian Business Review, 6, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0040-2
38.
Pra BaldiA.BeniR.CornoldiC.CavedonA. (1985). Some conditions for the occurrence of the bizarreness effect in free recall. British Journal of Psychology, 76(4), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01966.x
39.
PriceC.HumphreysG. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 41(4), 797–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748908402394
40.
RanganathC.RainerG. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4(3), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1052
41.
RappaportS. J.HumphreysG. W.RiddochM. J. (2013). The attraction of yellow corn: Reduced attentional constraints on coding learned conjunctive relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032506
42.
RedmannA.FitzPatrickI.IndefreyP. (2019). The time course of colour congruency effects in picture naming. Acta Psychologica, 196, 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.005
43.
ReppaI.WilliamsK. E.WorthE. R.GrevilleW. J.SaundersJ. (2017). Memorable objects are more susceptible to forgetting: Evidence for the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Acta Psychologica, 181, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.012
44.
ReppaI.WilliamsK. E.GrevilleW. J.SaundersJ. (2020). The relative contribution of shape and colour to object memory. Memory & Cognition, 48(8), 1504–1521. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01058-w
45.
RundusD. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031185
46.
StaresinaB. P.GrayJ. C.DavachiL. (2009). Event congruency enhances episodic memory encoding through semantic elaboration and relational binding. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 19(5), 1198–1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn165
47.
TanakaJ.PresnellL. (1999). Color diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(6), 1140–1153. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207619
TeichmannL.GrootswagersT.CarlsonT. A.RichA. N. (2019). Seeing versus knowing: The temporal dynamics of real and implied colour processing in the human brain. NeuroImage, 200, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.062
50.
TseD.TakeuchiT.KakeyamaM.KajiiY.OkunoH.TohyamaC.BitoH.MorrisR. G. (2011). Schema-dependent gene activation and memory encoding in neocortex. Science (New York, N.Y.), 333(6044), 891–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205274
51.
van KesterenM. T.BeulS. F.TakashimaA.HensonR. N.RuiterD. J.FernandezG. (2013). Differential roles for medial prefrontal and medial temporal cortices in schema-dependent encoding: From congruent to incongruent. Neuropsychologia, 51(12), 2352–2359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.027
52.
van KesterenM. T.RijpkemaM.RuiterD. J.FernandezG. (2010). Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 30(47), 15888–15894. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2674-10.2010
53.
WaddillP. J.McDanielM. A. (1998). Distinctiveness effects in recall. Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211374
54.
WatkinsM. J.LeCompteD. C.KimK. (2000). Role of study strategy in recall of mixed lists of common and rare words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.239
55.
WollenK. A.CoxS. D. (1981). The bizarreness effect in a multitrial intentional learning task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18(6), 296–298. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333632
56.
WurmL. H.LeggeG. E.IsenbergL. M.LuebkerA. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(4), 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.899
57.
ZhangT.BaoC.XiaoC. (2019). Promoting effects of color-text congruence in banner advertising. Color Research & Application, 44(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22260
58.
ZhouW.DengL.DingJ. (2021). Neural mechanism underlying the effects of object color on episodic memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00229
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
