The purpose of this study was to compare the relative effects of self-controlled knowledge of results (SCKR) to other KR schedules of varying relative frequency (25%, 50%, and 100% of acquisition trials) on motor skill learning. Participants received basic instructions on the soccer overhead throw and then performed 50 acquisition trials, during which KR was provided according to the assigned schedule, followed by a retention test, during which no KR was provided. Retention scores were highest for the SCKR and 50% KR frequency groups who shared comparable absolute KR frequency and distribution relative to successful versus unsuccessful trials. These results indicated that both self-control and moderate frequency feedback enhanced learning, supporting an inverted U-shaped effect of feedback frequency on skill acquisition.
AikenC. A.FairbrotherJ. T.PostP. G. (2012).
The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot. Frontiers in Psychology,
3, 338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00338
2.
AliA.FawverB.KimJ.FairbrotherJ.JanelleC. M. (2012).
Too much of a good thing: Random practice scheduling and self-control of feedback lead to unique but not additive learning benefits. Frontiers in Psychology,
3, 503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00503
3.
AndersonD. I.MagillR. A.MayoA. M.SteelK. A. (2020). Enhancing motor skill acquisition with augmented feedback. In HodgesN. J.WilliamsA. M. (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 3–19).
Routledge.
4.
AndersonD. I.MagillR. A.SekiyaH.RyanG. (2005).
Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior,
37(3), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.37.3.231-238
5.
AoyagiY.OhnishiE.YamamotoY.KadoN.SuzukiT.OhnishiH.HokimotoN.FukayaN. (2019).
Feedback protocol of ‘fading knowledge of results’ is effective for prolonging motor learning retention. Journal of Physical Therapy Science,
31(8), 687–691. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.687
6.
BoekartsM. (1996).
Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist,
1(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.100
7.
BokumsR. M.MeiraC. M.NeivaJ. F.OliveiraT.MaiaJ. F. (2012).
Self-controlled feedback and trait anxiety in motor skill acquisition. Psychology,
03(05), 406–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.35057
8.
CarterM. J.CarlsenA. N.Ste-MarieD. M. (2014).
Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: A replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005.). Frontiers in Psychology,
5, 1325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01325
9.
CarterM. J.PattersonJ. T. (2012).
Self-controlled knowledge of results: Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection. Human Movement Science,
31(6), 1459–1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.008
10.
CarterM.RathwellS.Ste-MarieD. (2016).
Motor skill retention is modulated by strategy choice during self-controlled knowledge of results schedules. Journal of Motor Learning and Development,
4(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2015-0023
11.
ChiviacowskyS. (2014).
Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
15(5), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003
12.
ChiviacowskyS.GodinhoM.TaniG. (2005).
Self-controlled knowledge of results: Effects of different schedules and task complexity. Journal of Human Movement Studies,
49(4), 277–296.
13.
ChiviacowskyS.LessaH. T. (2017).
Choices over feedback enhance motor learning in older adults. Journal of Motor Learning and Development,
5(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0031
14.
ChiviacowskyS.WulfG. (2002).
Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
73(4), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040
15.
ChiviacowskyS.WulfG. (2005).
Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
76(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260
16.
ChiviacowskyS.WulfG.de MedeirosF. L.KaeferA.WallyR. (2008).
Self-controlled feedback in 10-year-old children: Higher feedback frequencies enhance learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
79(1), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599467
17.
ChiviacowskyS.WulfG.LewthwaiteR. (2012).
Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology,
3, 458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458
18.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
Routledge.
19.
FairbrotherJ. T. (2019). Skill acquisition: The science and practice of teaching sport skills. In AnshelM. H. (Ed.), APA handbook of sport and exercise psychology: Volume 1 sport psychology (pp. 531–555).
American Psychological Association.
20.
FairbrotherJ. T.LaughlinD. D.NguyenT. V. (2012).
Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. Frontiers in Psychology,
3, 323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00323
21.
FigueiredoL. S.UgrinowitschH.FreireA. B.SheaJ. B.BendaR. N. (2018).
External control of knowledge of results: Learner involvement enhances motor skill transfer. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
125(2), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512517753503
22.
GoudiniR.AshrafpoornavaeeS.FarsiA. (2019).
The effects of self-controlled and instructor-controlled feedback on motor learning and intrinsic motivation among novice adolescent taekwondo players. Acta Gymnica,
49(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2019.002
23.
GuadagnoliM. A.DornierL. A.TandyR. D. (1996).
Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: The influence of task-related experience and complexity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
67(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607950
24.
GuadagnoliM. A.LeeT. D. (2004).
Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior,
36(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
25.
HemayattalabR. (2014).
Effects of self-control and instructor-control feedback on motor learning in individuals with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities,
35(11), 2766–2772.
26.
JanelleC. M.KimJ.SingerR. N. (1995).
Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
81(2), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/003151259508100253
27.
JanuárioM. S.FigueiredoL. S.PortesL. L.BendaR. N. (2019).
Effects of self-controlled knowledge of results on learning a taekwondo serial skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
126(6), 1178–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512519869086
28.
LewthwaiteR.WulfG. (2012). Motor learning through a motivational lens. In HodgesN. J.WilliamsA. M. (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 173–191).
Routledge.
29.
PattersonJ. T.CarterM. (2010).
Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human Movement Science,
29(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2009.12.003
30.
PattersonJ. T.CarterM.SanliE. (2011).
Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
82(4), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599799
31.
PattersonJ. T.LeeT. D. (2010).
Self-regulated frequency of augmented information in skill learning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Experimentale,
64(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016269
32.
PetranekL. J.BolterN. D.BellK. (2019).
Attentional focus and feedback frequency among first graders in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,
38(3), 1–206. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0080
33.
SalmoniA. W.SchmidtR. A.WalterC. B. (1984).
Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin,
95(3), 355–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
34.
SanliE. A.PattersonJ. T.BrayS. R.LeeT. D. (2012).
Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology,
3, 611. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg00611
35.
SchmidtR. A.LangeC.YoungD. E. (1990).
Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Human Movement Science,
9(3-5), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90007-Z
36.
SchmidtR. A.YoungD. E.SwinnenS.ShapiroD. C. (1989).
Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
15(2), 352–359.
37.
SidawayB.BatesJ.OcchiogrossoB.SchlagenhauferJ.WilkesD. (2012).
Interaction of feedback frequency and task difficulty in children's motor skill learning. Physical Therapy,
92(7), 948–957. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110378
38.
SparrowW. A. (1995).
Acquisition and retention effects of reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results. Australian Journal of Psychology,
47(2), 97–104.
39.
Ste-MarieD. M.CarterM. J.YanthaZ. D. (2019). Self-controlled learning. In HodgesN. J.WilliamsA. M. (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 119–140).
Routledge.
40.
SullivanK. J.KantakS. S.BurtnerP. A. (2008).
Motor learning in children: Feedback effects on skill acquisition. Physical Therapy,
88(6), 720–732. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070196
41.
WinsteinC. J.SchmidtR. A. (1990).
Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
16(4), 677–691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677
42.
WulfG.ChiviacowskyS.SchillerE.ÁvilaL. T. G. (2010).
Frequent external focus feedback enhances motor learning. Frontiers in Psychology,
1, 190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00190
43.
WulfG.LewthwaiteR. (2016).
Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9.
44.
WulfG.SheaC. H. (2002).
Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
9(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196276
45.
WulfG.SheaC. H.MatschinerS. (1998).
Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior,
30(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899809601335
46.
YaoW. X.FischmanM. G.WangY. T. (1994).
Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability. Journal of Motor Behavior,
26(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1994.9941683
