Given humans’ limited ability to recall past experiences for evaluation, scholars have proposed the peak-end rule stating that if perceived discomfort at the end of an aversive experience is lower than the peak discomfort experienced, the aversive experience will be remembered more positively. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the peak-end rule as applied to high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE). Participants were 30 inactive men (M age = 27.9, SD = 5.2 years). In the first session they performed a graded exercise test on cycle-ergometer to determine their maximal aerobic power (MAP) (M = 233, SD = 35W); and, in the second and third sessions, they performed two HIIE protocols in randomized order: (a) Short trial – 20-minutes of HIIE, composed of 30-second efforts at 100% of MAP interspersed by 30-seconds of passive recovery; and (b) Long trial – 20-minutes of the short trial, plus 10-minutes more of HIIE, decreasing 3% of MAP in each additional bout, resulting in 70% of MAP in the last bout. During exercise, we recorded the participants’ rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and affect, using the Feeling Scale (FS). At 30-minutes post-exercise, we again recorded the participants’ affect, using the Global Affect Evaluation (GAE) and their session-RPE, and we recorded their enjoyment, using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). In the last session, the participants chose a favorite protocol to repeat. All sessions were interspersed by at least 72 hours. The 10-minutes extra HIIE in the Long-trial condition resulted decreased heart rate values (M = 157, SD = 13bpm to M = 144, SD = 14bpm; p < 0.001), but psychological responses during and after exercise did not differ, nor did participants’ preferred HIIE protocol. As the load drop for the Long-trial was not enough to change the psychological responses during exercise, there was no difference in the retrospective evaluation as the peak-end rule would have suggested.
AlvesE. D.PanissaV. L. G.BarrosB. J.FranchiniE.TakitoM. Y. (2019).
Translation, adaptation, and reproducibility of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) and feeling scale to Brazilian Portuguese. Sport Sciences for Health,
15(2), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-018-0516-4
2.
BackhouseS. H.EkkekakisP.BidleS. J. H.FoskettA.WilliamsC. (2007).
Exercise makes people feel better but people are inactive: Paradox or artifact?Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,
29(4), 498–517. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.4.498
3.
BiddleS. J. H.MutrieN. (2008). Psychology of physical activity: Determinants, well-being & interventions(2nd ed).
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
4.
BorgG. (1998). Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales.
Human Kinects.
5.
BoxA. G.PetruzzelloS. J. (2020).
Why do they do it? Differences in high-intensity exercise-affect between those with higher and lower intensity preference and tolerance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
47, 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.04.011
6.
BrewerB. W.ManosT. M.McDevittA. V.CorneliusA. E.Van RaalteJ. L. (2000).
The effect of adding lower intensity work on perceived aversiveness of exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
22(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.22.2.119
7.
BuchheitM.LaursenP. B. (2013).
High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.),
43(5), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
9.
ChenM. J.FanX.MoeS. T. (2002).
Criterion validity of the Borg rating of perceived scale in healthy individuals: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences,
20(11), 873–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102320761787
10.
Da Silva MachadoD. G.CostaE. C.RayH.BealeL.ChatzisarantisN. L.de Farias-JuniorL. F.HardcastleS. J. (2019).
Short-term psychological and physiological effects of varying the volume of High-Intensity interval training in healthy men. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
126(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512518809734
11.
DeckerE. S.EkkekakisP. (2017).
More efficient, perhaps, but at what price? Pleasure and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval exercise in low-active women with obesity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
28, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.09.005
12.
EkkekakisP. (2013). Pleasure from the exercising body: Two centuries of changing outlooks in psychological thought. In D. B. Cook, L. L. Craft, S. N. Culos-Reed, P. Ekkekakis, J. L. Etnier, M. Hamer, K. A. Martin Ginis, J. E. Reed, J. A. Smits, & M. Ussher (Orgs.), Routledge handbook of physical activity and mental health (1st ed., pp. 35–56). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2013.06.003
13.
EkkekakisP. (2017).
People have feelings! Exercise psychology in paradigmatic transition. Current Opinion in Psychology,
16, 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.018
14.
EkkekakisP.DafermosM. (2012). Exercise is a many-splendored thing, but for some it does not feel so splendid: Staging a resurgence of hedonistic ideas in the quest to understand exercise behavior. In AcevedoE. O. (Org.), The oxford handbook of exercise psychology (pp. 295–335).
Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195394313.013.0016
15.
EkkekakisP.HallE. E.PetruzzelloS. J. (2005).
Some like it vigorous: Measuring individual differences in the preference for and tolerance of exercise intensity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
27(3), 350–374. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.27.3.350
16.
ElsangedyH. M.MachadoD. G. D. S.KrinskiK.Duarte Do NascimentoP. H.De Amorim OliveiraG. T.SantosT. M.HargreavesE. A.ParfittG. (2018).
Let the pleasure guide your resistance training intensity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise,
50(7), 1472–1479. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001573
17.
FosterC.DainesE.HectorL.SnyderA. C.WelshR. (1996).
Athletic performance in relation to training load. Wisconsin Medical Journal,
95(6), 370–374.
18.
FrazãoD. T.de Farias JuniorL. F.DantasT. C. B.KrinskiK.ElsangedyH. M.PrestesJ.HardcastleS. J.CostaE. C. (2016).
Feeling of pleasure to high-intensity interval exercise is dependent of the number of work bouts and physical activity status. PLoS One,
11(3), e0152752–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152752
19.
FredricksonB. L.KahnemanD. (1993).
Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
65(1), 45–55.
20.
HardyC. J.RejeskiW. J. (1989).
Not what, but how one feels: The measurement of affect during exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
11(3), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.11.3.304
21.
HargreavesE. A.StychK. (2013).
Exploring the peak and end rule of past affective episodes within the exercise context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
14(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.003
22.
JacksonA. S.PollockM. L.WardA. N. N. (1980).
Generalized equations for predicting body density of women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,
12(3), 175–181.
23.
KahnemanD. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow(1st ed.).Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
24.
KahnemanD.FredricksonB. L.SchreiberC. A.DonaldA.RedelmeierD. A. (1993).
When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science,
4(6), 401–405.
25.
KendzierskiD.DeCarloK. J. (1991).
Physical activity enjoyment scale: Two validation studies. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
13(1), 50–64.
26.
KelloggE.CantacessiC.McNamerO.HolmesH.von BargenR.RamirezR.GallagherD.VargasS.SantiaB.RodriguezK.AstorinoT. A. (2019).
Comparison of psychological and physiological responses to imposed vs. self-selected high-intensity interval training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
33(11), 2945–2952. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002528
27.
KimiecikJ. C.HarrisA. T. (1996).
What is enjoyment ? A conceptual/definitional analysis with implications for sport and exercise psychology. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
18(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.20.3.247
LaurentC. M.GreenJ. M.BishopP. A.SjökvistJ.SchumackerR. E.RichardsonM. T.Curtner-SmithM. (2011).
A practical approach to monitoring recovery: Development of a perceived recovery status scale. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
25(3), 620–628. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c69ec6
30.
MarquesM.AlvesE.HenriqueN.FranchiniE. (2020).
Positive affective and enjoyment responses to four High-Intensity interval exercise protocols. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
127(4), 742–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520918748
31.
MartinezN.KilpatrickM. W.SalomonK.JungM. E.LittleJ. P. (2015).
Affective and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval training in overweight-to-obese and insufficiently active adults. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
37(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/138-149.10.1371/journal.pone.0197124
32.
NivenA.LairdY.SaundersD. H.PhillipsS. M. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of affective responses to acute high intensity interval exercise compared with continuous moderate-and high-Intensity exercise. Health Psychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1728564
33.
OlneyN.WertzT.LaPortaZ.MoraA.SerbasJ.AstorinoT. A. (2018).
Comparison of acute physiological and psychological responses between moderate-intensity continuous exercise and three regimes of high-intensity interval training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
32(8), 2130–2138. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002154
34.
ParfittG.HughesS. (2009).
The exercise intensity–affect relationship: Evidence and implications for exercise behavior. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness,
7(2), S34–S41.
35.
PinheiroF. A.VianaB.PiresF. O. (2014).
Percepção subjetiva de esforço como marcadora da duração tolerável de exercício. Motricidade,
10(2), 100–106. p
36.
RachlinH. (1989). Reinforcement and punishment. In Judgment, decision, and choice: a cognitive/behavioral synthesis (1st ed., pp. 113–146). W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
37.
RedelmeierD. A.KahnemanD. (1996).
Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain,
66(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/PTC.2015.7232658
38.
RhodesR. E.KatesA. (2015).
Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine,
49(5), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9704-5
39.
SiriW. E. (1961). Body composition from fluid spaces and density: Analysis of methods. In BrozekJ.UniversityL.HenschelA. (Orgs.), Techniques for measuring body composition (1st ed., Vol.
61, pp. 223–244).
National Academy of Sciences.
40.
SkinnerB. F. (1953). Operant behavior. In l SimonR.Schusterm L. (Orgs.), Science and human behavior (1st ed., pp. 59–90).
Free Prass. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2003.80-345
41.
SmirmaulB. P. C.EkkekakisP.TeixeiraI. P.NakamuraP. M.KokubunE. (2015).
Questionário de preferência e tolerância da intensidade de exercício: Versão em português do brasil [Exercise intensity preference and tolerance questionnaire: Brazilian Portuguese version]. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano,
17(5), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2015v17n5p550
42.
StevensS. S. (1971).
Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review,
78(5), 426–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031324
43.
StorkM. J.BanfieldL. E.GibalaM. J.GinisK. A. M. (2017).
A scoping review of the psychological responses to interval exercise: Is interval exercise a viable alternative to traditional exercise?Health Psychology Review,
11(4), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1326011
44.
TownsendL. K.IslamH.DunnE.EysM.Robertson-WilsonJ.HazellT. J. (2017).
Modified sprint interval training protocols. Part II. Psychological responses.Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism,
42(4), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2016-0479
45.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974).
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.),
185(4157), 1124–1131.
46.
UrbaniakG. C.PlousS. (2013). Research randomizer (version 4.0) [computer software]. http://www.randomizer.org/
47.
Van der PligtJ.ZeelenbergM.van DijkW. W.de VriesN. K.RichardR. (1997).
Affect, attitudes and decisions: Let’s be more specific. European Review of Social Psychology,
8(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779643000074
48.
VareyC.KahnemanD. (1992).
Experiences extended across time: Evaluation of moments and episodes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,
5(3), 169–195.
49.
VitaleJ. A.La TorreA.BaldassarreR.PiacentiniM. F.BonatoM. (2017).
Ratings of perceived exertion and self-reported mood state in response to high intensity interval training. A crossover study on the effect of chronotype. Frontiers in Psychology,
8, 1232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01232
50.
ZenkoZ.EkkekakisP.ArielyD. (2016).
Can you have your vigorous exercise and enjoy it too? Ramping intensity down increases postexercise, remembered, and forecasted pleasure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,
38(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0286
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
