In this study we investigated the effects of advance information on task switching in young and old adults, using two forms of advance information (memory-based and cue-based) and a no advance information task. We compared 19 healthy young and 19 healthy older adults in terms of their behavioral performance and neural correlates under these three task-switching paradigms. We observed a significant difference in mixing cost between the two age groups. There was no switch cost group difference on the memory-based and cue-based tasks, but older adults showed a larger switch cost than younger adults on the no advance information task. On evoked potential measures, there was no group effect in P3 cue-locked positivity; but there was, a frontal shift of the target-locked P3, indexed as reactive control, among older adults. We observed an increased target-locked P3 in the no-information paradigm compared with the cue-based and memory-based paradigms in both groups. Task cue facilitated advance preparation and proactive control under the cue-based paradigm in both groups. Age-related decline and difficulty in control processes required for task goal maintenance were apparent among the older adults.
Adrover-RoigD.BarceloF. (2010).
Individual differences in aging and cognitive control modulate the neural indexes of context updating and maintenance during task switching. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior,
46(4), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.09.012
2.
AltmannE. M. (2007).
Comparing switch costs: Alternating runs and explicit cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
33(3), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.475
3.
American Electroencephalographic Society. (1994).
Guideline thirteen: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology,
11, 111–113.
4.
BäckmanL.LindenbergerU.LiS.-C.NybergL. (2010).
Linking cognitive aging to alterations in dopamine neurotransmitter functioning: Recent data and future avenues. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,
34(5), 670–677.
5.
BarcelóF.EsceraC.CorralM. J.PeriáñezJ. A. (2006).
Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
18(10), 1734–1748.
6.
BarcelóF.Muñoz-CéspedesJ. M.PozoM. A.RubiaF. J. (2000).
Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b response in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuropsychologia,
38(10), 1342–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00046-4
7.
BraverT. S.GrayJ. R.BurgessG. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In ConwayA. R. A.JarroldC.KaneM. J.MiyakeA.TowseJ. N. (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–113).
Oxford University Press.
8.
BraverT. S.WestR. (2008). Working memory, executive control, and aging. In F. I. M. Craig & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed., pp. 311–372). Psychology Press.
9.
ButlerK. M.WeywadtC. (2013).
Age differences in voluntary task switching. Psychology and Aging,
28(4), 1024–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034937
10.
CepedaN. J.KramerA. F.Gonzalez de SatherJ. (2001).
Changes in executive control across the life span: Examination of task-switching performance. Developmental Psychology,
37(5), 715–730.
11.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.
12.
DennisN. A.CabezaR. (2008). Neuroimaging of healthy cognitive aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed., pp. 1–54). Psychology Press.
13.
EichT. S.MacKay-BrandtA.SternY.GopherD. (2018).
Age-based differences in task switching are moderated by executive control demands. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,
73(6), 954–963. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw117
14.
ElchleppH.LavricA.MizonG. A.MonsellW. (2012).
A brain-potential study of preparation for and execution of a task-switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task. Human Brain Mapping,
33(5), 1137–1154.
15.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975).
Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research,
12(3), 189–198.
GajewskiP. D.FerdinandN. K.KrayJ.FalkensteinM. (2018).
Understanding sources of adult age differences in task switching: Evidence from behavioral and ERP studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,
92, 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.029
18.
GajewskiP. D.Wild-WallN.SchapkinS. A.ErdmannU.FreudeU.FalkensteinM. (2010).
Effects of aging and job demands on cognitive flexibility assessed by task switching. Biological Psychology,
85(2), 187–199.
19.
GrangeJ. A.HoughtonG. (2014). Models of cognitive control in task switching. In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 160–199). Oxford University Press.
20.
HahnS.AndersenG. J.KramerA. F. (2004).
Age influences multi-dimensional set switching. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition,
11(1), 25–36.
21.
HawkinsH. L.HillyardS. A.LuckS. J.MoulouaM.DowningC. J.WoodwardD. P. (1990).
Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
16(4), 802–811.
22.
JamadarS. D.ThienelR.KarayanidisF. (2015). Task switching processes. In TogaA. W. (Ed.), Brain mapping: An encyclopedic reference (pp. 327–335).
Academic Press.
23.
JimuraK.BraverT. S. (2010).
Age-related shifts in brain activity dynamics during task switching. Cerebral Cortex,
20(6), 1420–1431.
KarayanidisF.ColtheartM.MichieP. T.MurphyK. (2003).
Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching. Psychophysiology,
40(3), 329–348.
26.
KarayanidisF.JamadarS. D. (2014). ERP measures of proactive and reactive control processes in task-switching paradigms. In GrangeJ.HoughtonG. (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 200–236).
Oxford University Press.
27.
KarayanidisF.JamadarS. D.RugeH.PhillipsN.HeathcoteA.ForstmannB. U. (2010).
Advance preparation in task-switching: Converging evidence from behavioral, brain activation, and model-based approaches. Frontiers in Psychology,
1, 25.
28.
KarayanidisF.JamadarS. D., & SandayD. (2013).
Stimulus-level interference disrupts repetition benefit during task switching in middle childhood. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
7, 841.
29.
KarayanidisF.ProvostA.BrownS.PatonB.HeathcoteA. (2011a).
Switch specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task switching paradigm. Psychophysiology,
48(4), 559–568.
30.
KarayanidisF.WhitsonL. R.HeathcoteA.MichieP. T. (2011b).
Variability in proactive and reactive cognitive control processes across the adult lifespan. Frontiers in Psychology,
2, 318.
31.
KieffaberP. D.HetrickW. P. (2005).
Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology,
42(1), 56–71.
32.
KieselA.SteinhauserM.WendtM.FalkensteinM.JostK.PhilippA. M.KochI. (2010).
Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin,
136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842
33.
KoppB.LangeF.HoweJ.WesselK. (2014).
Age-related changes in neural recruitment for cognitive control. Brain and Cognition,
85, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.12.008
34.
KrayJ. (2006).
Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults. Brain Research,
1105(1), 83–92.
35.
KrayJ.FerdinandN. K. (2014). Task switching and aging. In GrangeJ. A.HoughtonG. (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 350–371).
Oxford University Press.
36.
KrayJ.LindenbergerU. (2000).
Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging,
15(1), 126–147.
37.
LienM.RuthruffE.KuhnsD. (2008).
Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: Does internal control ability decline with age?Psychology and Aging,
23(2), 330–341.
38.
MeiranN. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 377–400). MIT Press.
39.
MeiranN. (2014). The task-cuing paradigm: A user’s guide. In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 45–73). Oxford University Press.
40.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000).
The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology,
41(1), 49–100.
41.
MonsellS., (2003).
Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
77(3), 134–140.
42.
NicholsonR.KarayanidisF.PobokaD.HeathcoteA.MichieP. T. (2005).
Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. Psychophysiology,
42(5), 540–554.
43.
NieuwenhuisS.Aston-JonesG.CohenJ. D. (2005).
Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleusnorepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin,
131(4), 510–532.
44.
PangmanV. C.SloanJ.GuseL. (2000).
An examination of psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental Status Examination and the standardized Mini-Mental Status Examination: Implications for clinical practice. Applied Nursing Research,
13(4), 209–213.
45.
PhillipsL. H.HenryJ. D. (2008). Adult aging and executive functioning. In V. Anderson, R. Jacobs, & P. J. Anderson (Eds.), Neuropsychology, neurology, and cognition. Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective., (pp. 45–73). Psychology Press.
46.
RazN.LindenbergerU.RodrigueK. M.KennedyK. M.HeadD.WilliamsonA.DahleC.GerstorfD.AckerJ. D. (2005).
Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: General trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cerebral Cortex,
15(11), 1676–1689.
47.
RogersR. D.MonsellS. (1995).
Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
124(2), 207–231.
SalthouseT. A. (2011).
Neuroanatomical substrates of age-related cognitive decline. Psychological Bulletin,
137(5), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023262
50.
SalthouseT. A.AtkinsonT. M.BerishD. E. (2003).
Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
132(4), 566–594.
51.
SemlitschH. V.AndererP.SchusterP.PresslichO. (1986).
A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology,
23(6), 695–703.
52.
ShyuY. I.YipP. K. (2001).
Factor structure and explanatory variables of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for elderly persons in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi Zhi,
100(10), 676–683.
53.
SwainsonR.JacksonS. R.JacksonG. M. (2006).
Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: An ERP study of task-switching. Brain Research,
1105(1), 61–72.
54.
TreitzF.HeyderK.DaumI. (2007).
Differential course of executive control changes during normal aging. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition,
14(4), 370–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580600678442
55.
TuijlJ. P.ScholteE. M.de CraenA. J.van der MastR. C. (2012).
Screening for cognitive impairment in older general hospital patients: Comparison of the Six‐Item Cognitive Impairment Test with the Mini‐Mental State Examination. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,
27(7), 755–762.
56.
VerhaeghenP. (2011).
Aging and executive control: Reports of a demise greatly exaggerated. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
20(3), 174–180.
57.
VerhaeghenP.CerellaJ. (2002).
Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,
26(7), 849–857.
58.
VerlegerR.JaśkowskiP.WascherE. (2005).
Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology,
19(3), 165–181.
59.
WasylyshynC.VerhaeghenP.SliwinskiM.J. (2011).
Aging and task switching: A metaanalysis. Psychology and Aging,
26(1), 15–20.
60.
WilckensK. A.WooS. G.KirkA. R.EricksonK. I.WheelerM. E. (2014).
The role of sleep continuity and total sleep time in executive function across the adult lifespan. Psychology and Aging,
29(3), 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037234
