Motivational Effects of Enhanced Expectancies for Motor Learning in Individuals With High and Low Self-Efficacy

Abstract

Previous research has shown that enhanced expectancies can foster a person’s motivational state and facilitate motor learning. However, the effects of enhanced expectancies on motivational state and subsequent motor learning in individuals with varied motivational states (e.g., self-efficacy; SE) are not well understood. This study examined the effects of enhanced expectancies on motivational state and motor learning in individuals with high and low SE by manipulating the type of knowledge of results (KR). We selected 60 participants from 251 male undergraduate students, based on their SE level, and assigned them to four groups: (a) Good Performance KR and High SE, (b) Poor Performance KR and High SE, (c) Good Performance KR and Low SE, and (d) Poor Performance KR and Low SE. We asked participants to throw beanbags at a target with their nondominant hand during an acquisition phase (10 blocks of six trials each) and during subsequent retention and transfer tests. During acquisition, the Good KR groups received KR from their three most accurate trials in each training block, whereas the Poor KR groups received KR from their three poorest attempts in each block. We measured accuracy scores and changes in SE as dependent variables. Results showed that KR from good trials, relative to KR from poor trials, led to better accuracy scores during acquisition and retention and transfer tests, independent of participants’ initial SE levels. Moreover, KR on good trials enhanced SE in the Good KR and Low SE group and kept SE at a high level in the Good KR and High SE group during acquisition and on the retention and transfer tests. These results provide support for the OPTIMAL (optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning) theory of motor learning, and we discuss results in terms of the potential effects of positive feedback on motor performance in professional athletes.

Keywords

enhanced expectancies self-efficacy the OPTIMAL theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ávila

L. T. G.

Chiviacowsky

Wulf

Lewthwaite

(2012). Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 849–853.

Badami

VaezMousavi

Wulf

Namazizadeh

(2011). Feedback after good trials enhances intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 360–364.

Badami

VaezMousavi

Wulf

Namazizadeh

(2012). Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on self-confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 196–203.

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 84(2), 191–215.

Chiviacowsky

Wulf

(2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 40–47.

Chiviacowsky

Wulf

Wally

Borges

(2009). KR after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 663–668.

Ghorbani

(2019). Motivational effects of enhancing expectancies and autonomy for motor learning: An examination of the OPTIMAL theory. The Journal of General Psychology, 146(1), 79–92.

Gonçalves

G. S.

Cardozo

P. L.

Valentini

N. C.

Chiviacowsky

(2018). Enhancing performance expectancies through positive comparative feedback facilitates the learning of basketball free throw in children. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 36, 174–177.

Grand

K. F.

Daou

Lohse

K. R.

Miller

M. W.

(2017). Investigating the mechanisms underlying the effects of an incidental choice on motor learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(2), 207–226.

10.

Lessa

H. T.

Tani

Chiviacowsky

(2018). Benefits of enhanced expectancies through temporal-comparative feedback for motor learning in older adults. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 49, 521–530.

11.

Montes

Wulf

Navalta

J. W.

(2018). Maximal aerobic capacity can be increased by enhancing performers’ expectancies. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 58(5), 744–749.

12.

Ong, N. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2018). Balancing our perceptions of the efficacy of success-based feedback manipulations on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(6), 614--630.

13.

Pascua

L. A.

Wulf

Lewthwaite

(2015). Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(1), 58–66.

14.

Saemi

Porter

J. M.

Ghotbi-Varzaneh

Zarghami

Maleki

(2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 378–382.

15.

Saemi

Wulf

Ghotbi-Varzaneh

Zarghami

(2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials enhances motor learning in children. Revista Brasileira de Educaçao Fisica e Esporte (Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sport), 25(4), 673–681.

16.

Stoate

Wulf

Lewthwaite

(2012). Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 815–823.

17.

Wulf

Chiviacowsky

Cardozo

(2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science, 37, 12–20.

18.

Wulf

Lewthwaite

(2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1382–1414.