Body image adjustments after a limb loss are essential to rehabilitation. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS). We analyzed data from a nonprobability sample of 100 participants (71% men, mean age 48.26 ± 18.35 years) by using a confirmatory factor analysis with partial least square path modeling. We evaluated the structural model by using Pearson’s coefficient of determination, path coefficients, indicator of Stone-Geisser, and Cohen’s indicator. We evaluated item factor loadings and average variance extracted for model measurement. We tested the internal consistency with Cronbach’s α test and composite reliability and evaluated the discriminant validity by adopting Fornell and Larcker (1981) criteria. We tested the original and a new three-factor model and performed correlational and variance analyses as additional tests. The new three-factor theoretical model had stronger structural support and better discriminant and convergent validities than the original three-factor model. The ABIS total score was inversely correlated with body appreciation. There were significant body image score differences between the groups of sedentary and physically active amputees and among those with differences in years since amputation, but there were no differences between those with different causes of amputation nor for those with different amputated limbs.
AvalosL.TylkaT. L.Wood-BarcalowN. (2005). The Body Appreciation Scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Body Image, 2, 285–297.
2.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. B. (2002). Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of healthy status measures. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons/Institute for Work & Health.
3.
Brasil, Ministério da Saúde. (2013). Diretrizes de atenção à pessoa amputada [Directives for attention to the amputee person]. Brasília: Author.
4.
BreakeyJ. W. (1997). The lower limb amputee. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 9, 58–69.
5.
BuminG.BayramlarK.YakutY.SenerG. Y. (2008). Cross cultural adaptation and reliability of the Turkish version of Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS). Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 22, 11–16.
6.
ByrneL. (2012). Neuroscientific perspectives on body image. In: CashT. F. (ed.) Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (pp. 568–573). London, England: Elsevier.
7.
CampanaA. N. N. B. (2013). Body experience as the core of body image development. In: ColumbusA. M. (ed.) Advances in psychology research (Vol. 109, pp. 87–94). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
8.
Campos, C. J. G., & Sekiya, F. H. (2004). Aspectos biopsicossociais de pessoas amputadas por doenças vasculares ou por trauma [Biopsychosocial aspects of amputee persons by vascular diseases and trauma]. Paper presented at the 56th Brazilian Congress of Nursery, Gramado, Brazil, 24–29 October.
9.
CashT. (2011). Cognitive–behavioral perspectives on body image. In: CashT.SmolakL. (eds) Body image: A handbook of science, practice and prevention (pp. 39–47). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
CashT. F. (2000). The body image workbook: An 8-step program for learning to like your looks. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
ChamlianT. R.VarandaR.PereiraC. L.de ResendeJ. M.de FariaC. C. (2013). Perfil epidemiológico dos pacientes amputados de membros inferiores atendidos no Lar Escola São Francisco entre 2006 e 2012 [Epidemiological profile of lower limb amputees patients assisted at the Lar Escola São Francisco between 2006 and 2012]. Acta Fisiátrica, 20(4), 219–223.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
13.
CrerandC. E.MageeL. (2012). Amputations and prosthetic devices. In: CashT. F. (ed.) Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (pp. 1–7). London, England: Elsevier.
14.
DesmondD. M.MacLachlanM. (2006). Coping strategies as predictors of psychosocial adaptation in a sample of elderly veterans with acquired lower limb amputations. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 208–216.
15.
FisherK.HanspalR. (1998). Body image and patients with amputations: Does the prosthesis maintain the balance?International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21, 355–364.
16.
FornellC.LarckerD. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
17.
Gabarra, L. M. (2010). Emotional states, coping strategies, supporting network and psychosocial adaptation of amputee (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
18.
GallagherP.HorganO.FranchignoniF.GiordanoA.MacLachlanM. (2007). Body image in people with lower-limb amputation: A Rasch analysis of the Amputee Body Image Scale. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86, 205–215.
19.
HairJ.HultG. T. M.RingleC.SarstedtM. A. (2014). Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
20.
HarcourtD.RumseyN. (2011). Body image and biomedical interventions for disfiguring conditions. In: CashT. F.SmolakL. (eds) Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention (pp. 404–414). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
HeadH.HolmesH. G. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34, 102–254.
22.
HinkleD. E.WiersmaW.JursS. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
KohlS. J. (1984). The process of psychological adaptation to traumatic limb loss. In: KruegerD. W. (ed.) Emotional rehabilitation of physical trauma and disability (pp. 113–148). New York, NY: Medical and Scientific Books.
24.
KruegerD. W. (1990). Developmental and psychodynamic perspectives on body-image change. Body images: Development, deviance and change (pp. 255–271). New York: Guilford Press.
25.
LittmanA. J.BouldinE. D.HaselkornJ. K. (2017). This is your new normal: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to physical activity in Veterans with lower extremity loss. Disability and Health Journal, 10(4), 600–606.
26.
MageeL. (2012). Traumatic injuries and body image. In: CashT. F. (ed.) Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (pp. 790–797). London, England: Elsevier.
27.
McDonnellP. M.ScottR. N.DickisonJ.TheriaultR. A.WoodB. (1989). Do artificial limbs become part of the user? New evidence. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 26(2), 17–24.
28.
MurrayC. D. (2004). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(16), 963–973.
29.
MurrayC. D.FoxJ. (2002). Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 925–931.
30.
NevesA. N.HirataK. M.TavaresM. C. G. C. F. (2015). Body image, trauma and resilience: A reflection on the role of the physical education teacher. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 19, 97–104.
31.
NevesA. N.LoreyG. A.CampanaM. B.FerreiraL.SilvaD. (2015). Factor structure, validity and internal consistency of the Body Appreciation Scale for Brazilian physically active spinal cord injured men. Acta Fisiátrica, 22, 77–82.
32.
NicholasJ. J.RobinsonL. R.SchulzR.BlairC.AliotaR.HairstonG. (1993). Problems experienced and perceived by prosthetic patients. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 5(1), 36–39.
33.
OzakiL. A. T.Camargo FilhoJ. C.TarumotoM. H.CeliR.CamargoT. (2010). Caracterização de pacientes amputados em centro de reabilitação [Characterization of amputee patients in rehabilitation center]. Revista de Terapia Manual, 8(40), 561–567.
34.
PereiraB. P.KourA. K.LeowE. L.PhoR. W. (1996). Benefits and use of digital prostheses. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 21, 222–228.
35.
PucherI.KickingerW.FrischenschlagerO. (1999). Coping with amputation and phantom limb pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46, 379–383.
36.
RybarczykB.NyenhuisD. L.NicholasJ. J.CashS. M.KaiserJ. (1995). Body image, perceived social stigma, and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40(2), 95–110.
37.
RybarczykB. D.NyenhuisD. L.NicholasJ. J.SchulzR.AliotoR. J.BlairC. (1992). Social discomfort and depression in a sample of adults with leg amputations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(12), 1169–1173.
38.
SchilderP. (2000). The image and appearance of the human body. Abingdon: Routledge.
39.
SemenzaC. (2001). Disorders of body representation. In: BollerF.GrafmanF. J. (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, Volume 3: Language and aphasia (pp. 285–304). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
40.
SenraH.OliveiraR. A.LealI.VieiraI. (2012). Beyond the body image: A qualitative study on how adults experience lower limb amputation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26, 180–191.
41.
ShontzF. C. (1969). Perceptual and cognitive aspects of body experience. London, England: Academic Press.
42.
SwamiV.CampanaA. N. N. B. C.FerreiraL.BarretS.HarrisA. S.TavaresM. C. G. C. F. (2011). The Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale: Initial examination of its factor structure and correlates among Brazilian adults. BodyImage, 8, 179–185.
43.
TalbotL. A.BredeE.MetterJ. E.MetterJ. (2017). Psychological and physical health in military amputees during rehabilitation: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Military Medicine, 182(5), e1619–e1624.
44.
TaleporosG.McCabeM. P. (2002). Body image and physical disability—Personal perspectives. Social Science & Medicine, 54(6), 971–980.
45.
TatarY. (2010). Body image and its relationship with exercise and sports in Turkish lower-limb amputees who use prosthesis. Science & Sports, 25, 312–317.
46.
Tavares, M. C. G. C. F. (2003). Imagem corporal: Conceito e desenvolvimento [Body image: Concept and development]. Bareuri, Brazil: Manole.
47.
ThompsonJ. K.BurkeN. L.KrawczykR. (2012). Measurement of body image in adolescence and adulthood. In: CashT. F. (ed.) Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (pp. 512–520). London, England: Elsevier.
48.
WetterhahnK. A.HansonC.LevyC. E. (2002). Effect of participation in physical activity on body image of amputees. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81(3), 194–201.
49.
WilsonP. G.KrebsM. J. S. (1983). Coping with amputation. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 17, 165–175.
50.
YuenH. K.HansonC. (2002). Body image and exercise in people with and without acquired mobility disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(6), 289–296.
