The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on kinesthetic perception, when applied to the somatosensory cortex, was examined. Further, the facilitatory and inhibitory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation using different stimulation frequencies were tested. Six female (M age = 32.0 years, SD = 6.7) and nine male (M age = 32.9 years, SD = 6.6) participants were asked to perceive the tendon vibration illusion of the left wrist joint and to replicate the illusion with their right hand. When comparing changes in the corresponding movement amplitude and velocity after three different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols (sham, 1 Hz inhibitory, and 5 Hz facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation), the movement amplitude was found to decrease with the inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, while the movement velocity respectively increased and decreased with the facilitatory and inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. These results confirmed the modulating effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on kinesthetic perception in a single experimental paradigm.
AzañónE.HaggardP. (2009) Somatosensory processing and body representation. Cortex45(9): 1078–1084.
2.
BalslevD.ChristensenL. O.LeeJ. H.LawI.PaulsonO. B.MiallR. C. (2004) Enhanced accuracy in novel mirror drawing after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced proprioceptive deafferentation. Journal of Neuroscience24(43): 9698–9702.
3.
BuetefischC. M.HinesB.ShusterL.PergamiP.MathesA. (2011) Motor demand-dependent improvement in accuracy following low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of left motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology106(4): 1614–1621.
4.
Calvin-FiguièreS.RomaiguèreP.GilhodesJ. C.RollJ. P. (1999) Antagonist motor responses correlate with kinesthetic illusions induced by tendon vibration. Experimental Brain Research124(3): 342–350.
5.
CasiniL.RomaiguèreP.DucorpsA.SchwartzD.AntonJ. L.RollJ. P. (2006) Cortical correlates of illusory hand movement perception in humans: A MEG study. Brain Research1121(1): 200–2006.
6.
Celik, O., O’malley, M. K., Glliespie, R. B., Shewokis, P. A., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2009). Compact and low-cost tendon vibrator for inducing proprioceptive illusions. Proceedings—3rd Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics, Salt Lake City, UT (pp. 623–624). New York, NY: IEEE.
7.
CordoP.GurfinkelV. S.BevanL.KerrG. K. (1995) Proprioceptive consequences of tendon vibration during movement. Journal of Neurophysiology74(4): 1675–1688.
8.
CordoP. J.GurfinkelV. S.BrumagneS.Flores-VieiraC. (2005) Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion. Experimental Brain Research167(3): 324–334.
9.
De SantisD.ZenzeriJ.CasadioM.MasiaL.RivaA.MorassoP.SqueriV. (2015) Robot-assisted training of the kinesthetic sense: Enhancing proprioception after stroke. Frontiers in Human Movement Science8: 1037, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.1037.
10.
EllisonA.CoweyA. (2006) TMS can reveal contrasting functions of the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams. Experimental Brain Research175(4): 618–625.
11.
GandiviaS. C.BurkeD. (1992) Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movement?Behavioural and Brain Research15(s4): 614–632.
12.
GardnerE. P.CostanzoR. M. (1981) Properties of kinesthetic neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkey. Brain Research214(12): 301–319.
13.
GhezC.GordonJ.GhilardiM. F. (1995) Impairment of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. Journal of Neurophysiology73: 361–372.
14.
GhezC.SainburgR. (1995) Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology73(2): 273–284.
15.
GobleD. J. (2010) Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: From basic science to general practice. Physical Therapy90(8): 1176–1184.
16.
GobleD. J.BrownS. H. (2010) Upper limb asymmetries in the perception of proprioceptively determined dynamic position sense. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance36(3): 768–775.
17.
GoodwinG. M.McCloskeyD. I.MatthewsP. B. (1972) The persistence of appreciable kinesthesia after paralysing joint afferents but preserving muscle afferents. Brain Research37(2): 326–329.
18.
Harris, J. A., Clifford, C. W., & Miniussi, C. (2008). The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Signal suppression or neural noise generation? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 734–740.
19.
HiscockA.MillerS.RothwellJ.TallisR. C.PomeroyV. M. (2008) Informing dose-finding studies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor function: A qualitative systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair22(3): 228–249.
20.
IzumizakiM.TsugeM.AkaiL.ProskeU.HommaI. (2010) The illusion of changed position and movement from vibrating one arm is altered by vision or movement of the other arm. Journal of Physiology588: 2789–2800.
21.
JenningsV. A.LamourY.SolisH.FrommC. (1983) Somatosensory cortex activity related to position and force. Journal of Neurophysiology49(5): 1216–1229.
22.
KammerT.PulsK.ErbM.GroddW. (2005) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. II. Characterization of induced Phosphenes and Scotomas. Experimental Brain Research160(1): 129–140.
23.
KatayamaT.SuppaA.RothwellJ. C. (2010) Somatosensory evoked potentials and high frequency oscillations are differently modulated by theta burst stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology121(12): 2097–2103.
24.
KnechtS.EllgerT.BreitensteinC.Bernd RigelsteinE.HenningsenH. (2003) Changing cortical excitability with low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation can induce sustained disruption of tactile perception. Biological Psychiatry53(2): 175–179.
25.
KodamaT.NakanoH.OshugiH.MarataS. (2016) Effects of vibratory stimulation-induced kinesthetic illusion on the neural activities of patient with stroke. Journal of Physical Therapy Science28: 419–425.
26.
LangN.HarmsJ.WeyhT.LemonR. N.PaulusW.RothwellJ. C.SiebnerH. R. (2006) Stimulus intensity and coil characteristics influence the efficacy of rTMS to suppress cortical excitability. Clinical Neurophysiology117(10): 2292–2301.
27.
McCloskey, D. I. (1973). Differences between the sesnsed of movement and position shown by the effects of loading and vibration of muscles in man. Brain Research, 61(26), 119–131.
28.
NaitoE.EhrssonH. H.GeyerS.ZillesK.RolandP. E. (1999) Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neuroscience19(14): 6134–6144.
29.
NaitoE.MoritaT.AmemiaK. (2016) Body representations in the human brain revealed by kinesthetic illusions and their essential contributions to motor control and corporeal awareness. Neuroscience Research104: 16–30.
30.
Pascual-LeoneA.TormosJ. M.KeenanJ.TarazonaF.CeñeteC.CataláM. D. (1998) Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology15(4): 333–343.
31.
PlegerB.BlankenburgF.BestmannS.RuffC. C.WiechK.StephanK. E.DolanR. J. (2006) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced changes in sensorimotor coupling parallel improvements of somatosensation in humans. Journal of Neuroscience26(7): 1945–1952.
32.
PremjiA.ZilukA.NelsonA. J. (2010) Bilateral somatosensory evoked potentials following intermittent theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. BMC Neuroscience11: 91, doi:10.1186/1471–2202-11–91.
33.
ProskeU. (2006) Kinesthesia: The role of muscle receptors. Muscle and Nerve34(5): 545–558.
34.
ProskeU.GandeviaS. C. (2009) The kinaesthetic senses. Journal of Physiology587: 4139–4146.
35.
RaiJ.PremjiA.TommerdahlM.NelsonA. J. (2012) Continuous theta-burst rTMS over primary somatosensory cortex modulates tactile perception on the hand. Clinical Neurophysiology123(6): 1226–1233.
36.
RollJ. P.VedelJ. P. (1982) Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Experimental Brain Research47(2): 177–190.
37.
RomaiguèreP.AntonJ. L.RothM.CasiniL.RollJ. P. (2003) Motor and parietal cortical areas both underlie kinaesthesia. Brain research. Cognitive Brain Research16(1): 74–82.
38.
RomaiguèreP.CalvinS.RollJ. P. (2005) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the sensorimotor cortex alters kinaesthesia. Neuroreport16(7): 693–697.
39.
RossiS.HallettM.RossiniP. M.Pascual-LeoneA.Safety of TMS Consensus Group (2009) Safety, ethical considerations, and application guideline for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology120(12): 2008–2039.
40.
RuitenbergM. F.VerweyW. B.SchutterD. J.AbrahamseE. L. (2014) Cognitive and neural foundations of discrete sequence skill: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia56: 229–238.
41.
SanesJ. N.MauritzK. H.DalakasM. C.EvartE. V. (1985) Motor control in humans with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. Human Neurobiology4: 101–114.
42.
SatowT.MimaT.YamamotoJ.OgaT.BegumT.AsoT.ShibasakiH. (2003) Short-lasting impairment of tactile perception by 0.9 Hz-rTMS of the sensorimotor cortex. Neurology60(6): 1045–1047.
43.
SchneiderS. A.PledgerB.DraganskiB.CordivariC.RothwellJ. C.BhatiaK. P.DolanR. J. (2010) Modulatory effects of 5 Hz rTMS over the primary somatosensory cortex in focal dystonia—An fMRI-TMS study. Movement Disorder25(1): 76–83.
44.
Siebner H. R., & Rothwell, J. (2003). Transcranial magnetic stimulation: New insights into representational cortical plasticity. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 1–16.
45.
SittigA. C.Denier van der GonJ. J.GielenC. C. (1987) The contribution of afferent information on position and velocity to the control of slow and fast human forearm movements. Experimental Brain Research67(1): 33–40.
46.
SongS.SandriniM.CohenL. G. (2011) Modifying somatosensory processing with non-invasive brain stimulation. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience29(6): 427–437.
47.
TadinD.SilvantoJ.Pascual-LeoneA.BattelliL. (2011) Improved motion perception and impaired spatial suppression following disruption of cortical area MT/V5. Journal of Neuroscience31(4): 1279–1283.
48.
TakaradaY.MimaT.AbeM.NakatsukaM.TairaM. (2014) Inhibition of the primary motor cortex can alter one’s “sense of effort”: Effects of low-frequency rTMS. Neurosciuence Research89: 54–60.
49.
TegenthoffM.RagertP.PlegerB.SchwenkreisP.FösterA. F.NicolasV.DeniseH. R. (2005) Improvement of tactile discrimination performance and enlargement of cortical somatosensory maps after 5 Hz rTMS. Plos Biology3(11): e362.
50.
VidoniE. D.AcerraN. E.DaoE.MeehanS. K.BoydL. A. (2010) Role of the primary somatosensory cortex in motor learning: An rTMS study. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory93(4): 532–539.
51.
VidoniE. D.BoydL. A. (2008) Motor sequence learning occurs despite disrupted visual and proprioceptive feedback. Behavioral and Brain Functions4(32): ▪▪, doi:10.1186/1744–9081-4–32.
52.
YoonH. C.LeeK. H.HuhD. C.LeeJ. H.LeeD. H. (2014) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the somatosensory cortex during prism adaptation. Perceptual and Motor Skills118(2): 491–506.
