Inhibitory deficits of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are well documented. However, the specific inhibition ability (stopping an ongoing response) of preschoolers with ADHD is little reported. This study adopted the tracking stop-signal task to examine preschoolers with ADHD. Twenty-eight children with ADHD (M = 6.1 year, SD = 0.6) were compared to 31 comparison children (M = 6.0 year, SD = 0.6) on a measure of inhibitory control. The results showed that preschool children with ADHD performed worse than their control groups on the stop-signal task, using the omission error index, implying an attention deficit. However, preschool children with ADHD did not exhibit significantly slower stop-signal reaction times relative to the control group. The ability of controlled response inhibition of preschool children may not be mature.
AldersonR. M.RapportM. D.KoflerM. J. (2007) Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and behavioral inhibition: A meta-analytic review of the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology35: 745–758.
2.
AldersonR. M.RapportM. D.HudecK.SarverD. E.KoflerM. J. (2010) Competing core processes in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Do working memory deficiencies underlie behavioral inhibition deficits?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology38: 497–507.
3.
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed., text rev. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
AndersonV. (1998) Assessing executive functions in children: Biological, psychological, and developmental considerations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation8: 319–349.
5.
BandG. P. H.van der MolenM. W.LoganG. D. (2003) Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica112: 105–142.
6.
BarkleyR. A. (1997a) ADHD and the nature of self-control, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
BarkleyR. A. (1997b) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin121: 65–94.
8.
BarkleyR. A. (2006) Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
BerlinL.BohlinG. (2002) Response inhibition, hyperactivity, and conduct problems among preschool children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology31(2): 242–251.
10.
BlairC.DiamondA. (2008) Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology20: 899–911.
11.
CarlsonS. M. (2005) Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Developmental neuropsychology28: 595–616.
12.
ConnersC. K.StaffM. H. S. (2000) Conners' continuous performance test II (CPT II V. 5), North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.
13.
DalenL.Sonuga-BarkeE. J.HallM.RemingtonB. (2004) Inhibitory deficits, delay aversion and preschool AD/HD: Implications for the dual pathway model. Neural Plasticity11(1–2): 1–11.
14.
Epstein, M. H., & Cullinan, D. (2001). Scale for assessing emotional disturbance (L.-Y. Zheng, Trans.). Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC: Psychological Publishing Corporation (Original work published 1998).
15.
EspyK. A.KaufmannP. M.McDiarmidM. D.GliskyM. L. (2001) New procedures to assess executive functions in preschool children. The Clinical Neuropsychologist15: 46–58.
16.
Gilliam, J. E. (2007). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder test: A method for identifying individuals with ADHD (L.-Y. Zheng, Trans.). Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC: Psychological Publishing Corporation (Original work published 1995).
17.
GordonM. (1988) The Gordon diagnostic system, 3rd ed. DeWitt, NY: Gordon System.
18.
KaplanR. F.StevensM. C. (2002) A review of adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A neuropsychological and neuroimaging perspective. CNS Spectrums7(5): 355–362.
19.
KochanskaG.MurrayK. T.CoyK. C. (1997) Inhibitory control as a contributor to conscience in childhood: From toddler to early school age. Child Development68: 263–277.
20.
KuntsiJ.OosterlaanJ.StevensonJ. (2001) Psychological mechanisms in hyperactivity: I. Response inhibition deficit, working memory impairment, delay aversion, or something else?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines42: 199–210.
21.
LijffijtM.KenemansL.VerbatenM. N.van EngelandH. (2005) A meta-analytic review of stopping performance inattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Deficient inhibitory motor control?Journal of Abnormal Psychology114: 216–222.
22.
LoganG. D.CowanW. B. (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review93: 295–327.
23.
LoganG. D.SchacharR. J.TannockR. T. (1997) Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological science8: 60–64.
24.
LipszycJ.SchacharR. (2010) Inhibitory control and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task. Journal of the International Neuropscyhological Society16: 1064–1076.
25.
NiggJ. T. (2001) Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder?Psychological Bulletin127: 571–598.
26.
OosterlaanJ.LoganG. D.SergeantJ. A. (1998) Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: A meta-analysis of studies with the Stop Task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry39: 411–425.
27.
PenningtonB. F.OzonoffS. (1996) Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry37: 51–87.
28.
SattlerJ. M. (1992) Assessment of children: WISC-IV and WPPSI-III supplement, San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.
29.
SchacharR. J.LoganG. D. (1990) Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychology26: 710–720.
Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S. (2002) Psychological heterogeneity in AD/HD – A dual pathway model of behaviour and cognition. Behavioural Brain Research130: 29–36.
32.
Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S.BitsakouP.ThompsonM. (2010) Beyond the dual pathway model: Evidence for the dissociation of timing, inhibitory, and delay-related impairments in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry49: 345–355.
33.
StroopJ. R. (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology18: 643–661.
34.
TannockR.SchacharR. J.CarrR. P.ChajczykD.LoganG. D. (1989) Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology17: 473–491.
35.
TannockR.SchacharR. J.LoganG. (1995) Methylphenidate and cognitive flexibility: Dissociated dose effects in hyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology23: 235–266.
36.
TrommerB. L.HoeppnerJ.-A. B.LorberR.ArmstrongK. (1988) The go/no-go paradigm in attention deficit disorder. Annuals of Neurology24: 610–614.
37.
VerbruggenF.LoganG. D. (2008) Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General137: 649–672.
38.
VerbruggenF.LoganG. D.StevensM. A. (2008) STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behavior Research Methods40(2): 479–483.
39.
VinceM. E. (1948) The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period. British Journal of Psychology38: 149–157.
40.
Wechsler, D. (2000). Manual for the Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence – revised (Y.-H. Chen and H.-Y. Chen, Trans.). Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC: Chinese Behavioral Science Corporation (Original work published 1989).
