Using the magnitude comparison task, the current study tested verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding accounts by comparing the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect in 30 Chinese-speaking and 60 bilingual Uighur Chinese participants. The experimental tasks were presented using Chinese words for 30 Chinese-speaking and 30 bilingual Uighur Chinese participants, while only Uighur words were presented to the remaining 30 bilingual Uighur Chinese participants. Overall, the results of the current study showed that verbal-spatial coding could be applied to the experimental task when presented using Chinese words, but visuospatial coding could be applied to the experimental task when presented using Uighur words. The findings demonstrated that spatial coding was flexible and depended upon the language context in which the experimental task was presented.
BaeG. Y.ChoiJ. M.ChoY. S.ProctorR. W. (2009) Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition35(6): 1506–1521.
2.
CrawfordL. E.RegierT.HuttenlocherJ. (2000) Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization. Cognition75(3): 209–235.
3.
DehaeneS.BossiniS.GirauxP. (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General122(3): 371–396.
4.
DehaeneS.DupouxE.MehlerJ. (1990) Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16(3): 626–641.
5.
DehaeneS.DupouxE.MehlerJ.CohenL.PaulesuE.PeraniD.Le BihanD. (1997) Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language. Neuroreport8(17): 3809–3815.
6.
DehaeneS.SpelkeE.PinelP.StanescuR.TsivkinS. (1999) Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science284(7): 970–974.
7.
FischerM. H.ShakiS.CruiseA. (2009) It takes just one word to quash a SNARC. Experimental Psychology56(5): 361–366.
8.
GeversW.SantensS.DhoogeE.ChenQ.Van den BosscheL.FiasW.VergutsT. (2010) Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number–space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General139(1): 180–190.
9.
GeversW.VergutsT.ReynvoetB.CaessensB.FiasW. (2006) Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance32(1): 32–44.
10.
GöbelS. M.ShakiS.FischerM. H. (2011) The cultural number line: A review of cultural and linguistic influences on the development of number processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology42(4): 543–565.
11.
HanS.NorthoffG. (2008) Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience9: 646–654.
12.
HutchinsonS.LouwerseM. M. (2014) Language statistics explain the spatial–numerical association of response codes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review21(2): 470–478.
13.
ImboI.BrauwerJ. D.FiasW.GeversW. (2012) The development of the SNARC effect: Evidence for early verbal coding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology111(4): 671–680.
14.
JagerG.PostmaA. (2003) On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia41(4): 504–515.
15.
KimKhs.RelkinN. R.LeeK. M.HirschJ. (1997) Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature388(6638): 171–174.
16.
KnopsA.ThirionB.HubbardE. M.MichelV.DehaeneS. (2009) Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science324: 1583–1585.
17.
LindemannO.AbolafiaJ. M.PrattJ.BekkeringH. (2008) Coding strategies in number space: Memory requirements influence spatial–numerical associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61(4): 515–524.
18.
LoganG. D. (1994) Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20(5): 1015.
19.
OjemannG. A. (1983) Brain organization for language from the prespective of electrical stimulation mapping. Behavioral Brain Science6(2): 189–206.
20.
PaivioA. (1986) Mental representations: A dual coding approach, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
PeraniD.DehaeneD.GrassiF.CohenL.CappS. F.DupouxE.MehlerJ. (1996) Brain processing of native and foreign languages. Neuroreport7(15–17): 2439–2444.
22.
PeraniD.PaulesuE.GallesN. S.DupouxE.DehaeneS.BettinardiV.MehlerJ. (1998) The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain, A Journal of Neurology121(3 Pt 10): 1841–1852.
23.
ProctorR. W.ChoY. S. (2006) Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin132(3): 416–442.
24.
ShakiS.FischerM. H. (2008) Reading space into numbers—A cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition108(2): 590–599.
25.
ShakiS.FischerM. H.PetrusicW. M. (2009) Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review16(2): 328–331.
26.
SpelkeE. S.TsivkinS. (2001) Language and number: A bilingual training study. Cognition78(1): 45–88.
27.
TangY.ZhangW.ChenK.FengS.JiY.ShenJ.LiuY. (2006) Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America103(28): 10775–10780.
28.
Weber-FoxC. M.NevilleH. J. (1996) Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience8(3): 231–256.
29.
YetkinO.YetkinF. Z.HaughtonV. M.CoxR. W. (1996) Use of functional MR to map language in multilingual volunteers. American Journal of Neuroradiology17(3): 473–477.
30.
ZebianS. (2005) Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture5(1–2): 165–190.
