Second language speech learning is predicated on learners’ ability to notice differences between their own language output and that of their interlocutors. Because many learners interact primarily with other second language users, it is crucial to understand which dimensions underlie the perception of second language speech by learners, compared to native speakers. For this study, 15 non-native and 10 native English speakers rated 30-s language audio-recordings from controlled reading and interview tasks for dissimilarity, using all pairwise combinations of recordings. PROXSCAL multidimensional scaling analyses revealed fluency and aspects of speakers’ pronunciation as components underlying listener judgments but showed little agreement across listeners. Results contribute to an understanding of why second language speech learning is difficult and provide implications for language training.
BentT.BradlowA. R. (2003) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America114: 1600–1610.
2.
BorgI.GroenenP. (1997) Modern multidimensional scaling, New York, NY: Springer.
3.
BoskerH. R.QuenéH.SandersT.JongN. H. (2014) The perception of fluency in native and non-native speech. Language Learning64: 579–614.
4.
BusingF. M. T. A.CommandeurJ. J.HeiserW. J. (1997) PROXSCAL: A multidimensional scaling program for individual differences scaling with constraints. In: BandillaW.FaulbaunF. (eds) Softstat 97: Advances in statistical software, Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius, pp. 237–258.
5.
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T. (2015). Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 814–837.
6.
de la MoraD. M.NesporM.ToroJ. M. (2013) Do humans and nonhuman animals share the grouping principles of the iambic-trochaic law?Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics75: 92–100.
7.
DerwingT. M. (2003) What do ESL students say about their accents?Canadian Modern Language Review59: 547–567.
8.
DerwingT.MunroM. J. (2001) What speaking rates do non-native listeners prefer?Applied Linguistics22: 324–337.
9.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A seven-year study. Language Learning63: 163–185.
10.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J.WiebeG. (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning48: 393–410.
11.
DerwingT. M.RossiterM. J.MunroM. J.ThomsonR. I. (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning54: 665–679.
12.
FieldJ. (2005) Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly39: 399–423.
13.
Flege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 692–707.
14.
FlegeJ. E. (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In: StrangeW. (ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues, Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 229–273.
15.
FlegeJ. E. (2003) Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In: MeyerA.SchillerN. (eds) Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 319–355.
16.
FlegeJ. E. (2009) Give input a chance!. In: PiskeT.Young-ScholtenM. (eds) Input matters in SLA, Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters, pp. 175–190.
17.
FlegeJ. E.FletcherK. L. (1992) Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America91: 370–389.
18.
Foote, J. A., Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., & Soler-Urzúa, F. (2013). Pronunciation teaching practices in communicative second language classes. The Language Learning Journal. Advance online publication.
19.
GrantL. (2001) Well said: Pronunciation for clear communication, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
IsaacsT.ThomsonR. I. (2013) Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly10: 135–159.
22.
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2011). Phonological memory, attention control, and musical ability: Effects of individual differences on rater judgments of second language speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(01), 113–140.
23.
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505.
24.
JakemanV.McDowellC. (2008) New insight into IELTS: Student’s book with answers, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
JaworskaN.Chupetlovska-AnastasovaA. (2009) A review of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology5(1): 1–10.
26.
KangO.RubinD.PickeringL. (2010) Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal94: 554–566.
27.
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 64(3), 459–489.
28.
LeveltW. J. M. (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
29.
LeviS. V.WintersS. J.PisoniD. B. (2007) Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America121: 2327–2338.
30.
MacKayI.FlegeJ. (2004) Effects of the age of second-language (L2) learning on the duration of L1 and L2 sentences: The role of suppression. Applied Psycholinguistics25: 373–396.
31.
MennenI. (2015) Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In: Delais-RoussarieE.Avanzi,M.HermentS. (eds) Prosody and language in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition and languages in multilingual situations, Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 171–188.
32.
MeyerJ. M.HeathA. C.EavesL. J.ChakravartiA. (2005) Using multidimensional scaling on data from pairs of relatives to explore the dimensionality of categorical multifactorial traits. Genetic Epidemiology9: 87–107.
33.
MunroM.DerwingT. (2001) Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition23: 451–468.
34.
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M.MortonS. L. (2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition28: 111–131.
35.
RauD.ChangH. H. A.TaroneE. E. (2009) Think or sink: Chinese learners’ acquisition of the English voiceless interdental fricative. Language Learning59: 581–621.
36.
RineyT. J.TakagiN.InutsukaK. (2005) Phonetic parameters and perceptual judgments of accent in English by American and Japanese listeners. TESOL Quarterly39: 441–466.
37.
RossiterM. J. (2009) Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review65: 395–412.
38.
SaitoK.LysterR. (2012) Effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese Learners of English. Language Learning62: 595–633.
39.
SawakiY.SinharayS. (2013) Investigating the value of section scores for the TOEFL iBT® Test. TOEFL iBT-21, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
40.
SawakiY.StrickerL. J.OranjeA. H. (2009) Factor structure of the TOEFL Internet-based test. Language Testing26: 005–30.
41.
SchmidtR. W. (2001) Attention. In: RobinsonP. (ed.) Cognition and second language instruction, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–32.
StibbardR. M.LeeJ. I. (2006) Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America120: 433–442.
44.
WinkeP.GassS.MyfordC. (2013) Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing30: 231–252.
45.
WintersS.O’BrienM. G. (2013) Perceived accentedness and intelligibility: The relative contributions of F0 and duration. Speech Communication55: 486–507.
