This study examines the constraints posed by labor shortages, rising costs, and regulatory barriers on the adoption of labor-saving technologies among facility vegetable farmers in China. Based on an empirical analysis of 1147 farm surveys, we find that labor cost and supply pressures significantly increase both the willingness and intensity of technology adoption, especially among larger farms and when supported by adaptable technology dissemination systems. In contrast, regulatory constraints exhibit a weaker influence, and existing government support measures prove ineffective. These findings suggest that policy reforms should focus on facilitating farm consolidation, strengthening organizational capacity, and developing context-specific technology extension systems to alleviate labor constraints and promote sustainable agricultural modernization.
AbateGTBernardTMakhijaS, et al. (2023) Accelerating technical change through ICT: Evidence from a video-mediated extension experiment in Ethiopia. World Development161: 106089.
2.
AdamsFUllahAMensahA, et al. (2025) Enhancing sustainable agriculture: Exploring the impact of credit access on cocoa farming through adoption of artificial hand pollination technology. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05906-6.
3.
ChenKWangZ (2022) A Study on the effects and influencing factors of agricultural support and subsidy policies from big data computing and analysis. Mobile Information Systems2022: –9.
4.
DeSilvaSEvensonREKimhiA (2006) Labor supervision and institutional conditions: Evidence from Bicol rice farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics88(4): 851–865.
5.
DissanayakeCAKJayathilakeWWickramasuriyaHVA, et al. (2022) A review on factors affecting technology adoption in agricultural sector. Journal of Agricultural Sciences – Sri Lanka17(2): 280–296.
6.
EtimN-AAUdolnyangSPEbukibaES, et al. (2021) Households’ decision to participate in cooperative organizations: Evidence from farmers in Akwa Ibom State, Southern Nigeria. Journal La Sociale2(4): 28–36.
7.
GallardoRKSauerJ (2018) Adoption of labor-saving technologies in agriculture. Annual Review of Resource Economics10(1): 185–206.
8.
Goldsmith-PinkhamPSorkinISwiftH (2020) Bartik instruments: What, when, why, and how. American Economic Review110(8): 2586–2624.
9.
GuptaSKishoreAAlviMF, et al. (2020) Designing better input support programs: Lessons from zinc subsidies in Andhra Pradesh, India. PLOS ONE15(12): e0242161.
10.
HazellPHerdtR (1987) Agricultural development: An international perspective. Journal of Development Economics26(1): 197–200.
11.
HuYLiBZhangZ, et al. (2022) Farm size and agricultural technology progress: Evidence from China. Journal of Rural Studies93: 417–429.
12.
HumaidiFSoedartoT (2022) Competence of agricultural extension an effort to increase agricultural productivity in Sidoarjo. Agricultural Science5(2): 114–123.
13.
IssakaYBDonkorSADonkorSA (2025) Adoption of sustainable intensification practices among smallholder rice farmers in northern Ghana: A case study of the Savelugu municipality. Ghana Journal of Science, Technology and Development10(2): 173–195.
14.
JiXQianZZhangL, et al. (2018) Rural labor migration and Households’ land rental behavior: Evidence from China. China & World Economy26(1): 66–85.
15.
KarboRTFrewerLJArealF, et al. (2024) A systematic review of the efficacy of theories used to understand farmers’ technology adoption behavior in lower-to-middle-income countries. Development Studies Research11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2023.2294696.
16.
KumarPKarASinghDR, et al. (2021) Protected cultivation of horticultural crops in Uttarakhand: An economic analysis. Agronomy11(4): 92.
17.
KumarSHonnappanavarMSharathHN, et al. (2023) Ecological and economic security through organic vegetable cultivation in the raised bed model: A case study of Akshayakalpa organics in Tiptur, India. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change13(11): 3711–3717.
18.
LiCShaZSunX, et al. (2022) The effectiveness assessment of agricultural subsidy policies on food security: Evidence from China’s poverty-stricken villages. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(21): 13797.
19.
LiaoFZhengYWangX (2025) Promoting the replacement of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer: The role of policy incentives and digital technology. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1527913.
20.
LiuZ (2022) Rural population decline, cultivated land expansion, and the role of land transfers in the farming-pastoral ecotone: A case study of Taibus, China. Land11(2): 56.
21.
LiuZRodríguezSE (2024) Research on the interaction mechanism between land system reform and rural population flow: Europe (taking Spain as an example) and China. Land13(8): 1162.
22.
MandaJKhonjeMGAleneAD, et al. (2020) Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change158: 120160.
23.
MazancováKMartinátSPíchaK, et al. (2025) Perceived and “real” importance of subsidies for agricultural enterprises in post-communist EU countries. SAGE Open15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251324756.
24.
Montes de Oca MunguiaOPannellDJ& LlewellynR (2021) Understanding the adoption of innovations in agriculture: A review of selected conceptual models. Agronomy11(1): 39.
25.
NewayMMZegeyeMB (2022) Gender differences in the adoption of agricultural technology in North Shewa Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2069209.
26.
Nuhu JinbaaniA& WaleE (2023) How does participation in Ghana’s fertilizer subsidy program (GFSP) affect the adoption of sustainable intensification practices (SIPs) and gross farm inputs?Development Studies Research10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2023.2180047.
27.
OlabanjiMFChitakiraM (2025) The adoption and scaling of climate-smart agriculture innovation by smallholder farmers in South Africa: A review of institutional mechanisms, policy frameworks and market dynamics. World (Oakland, Calif6(2): 51.
28.
PanYSmithSCSulaimanM (2018) Agricultural extension and technology adoption for food security: Evidence from Uganda. American Journal of Agricultural Economics100(4): 1012–1031.
29.
PuntsagdorjBOrosooDHuoX, et al. (2021) Farmer’s perception, agricultural subsidies, and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: A case from Mongolia. Sustainability13(3): 1524.
30.
SantiteerakulSSopadangAYaibuathet TippayawongK, et al. (2020) The role of smart technology in sustainable agriculture: A case study of Wangree plant factory. Sustainability12(11): 4640.
31.
SethiDSoodSKumarV, et al. (2024) Spatio-temporal changes in area, production and productivity of vegetables: A review. Agricultural Reviews. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.r-2643.
32.
ShikukuKMMelesseMB (2020) Networks, incentives and technology adoption: Evidence from a randomised experiment in Uganda. European Review of Agricultural Economics47(5): 1740–1775.
33.
TakahashiKMuraokaROtsukaK (2019) Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature. Agricultural Economics51(1): 31–45.
34.
ThompsonBLeducGManevska-TasevskaG, et al. (2023) Farmers’ adoption of ecological practices: A systematic literature map. Journal of Agricultural Economics75(1): 84–107.
35.
UddinMNAkterSRoyD, et al. (2024) An econometric analysis of factors affecting vegetable growers’ interest in good agricultural practices: A case of rural Bangladesh. Environment, Development and Sustainability27(7): 15803–15823.
36.
VillagranEEspitiaJJAmadoG, et al. (2025) CO2 Enrichment in protected agriculture: A systematic review of greenhouses, controlled environment systems, and vertical farms—part 2. Sustainability17(7): 2809.
37.
WangGXuM (2025) Effect of cooperative membership on farmers’ technology adoption based on the mediating effects of technology cognition. Heliyon11(2): e42130.
38.
WangXYamauchiFHuangJ (2016) Rising wages, mechanization, and the substitution between capital and labor: Evidence from small scale farm system in China. Agricultural Economics47(3): 309–317.
39.
WangYWangZZhaoM, et al. (2024) The influence of technology perceptions on farmers’ water-saving irrigation technology adoption behavior in the north China plain. Water Policy26(2): 170–188.
40.
WhiteDSLabartaRALeguíaEJ (2005) Technology adoption by resource-poor farmers: Considering the implications of peak-season labor costs. Agricultural Systems85(2): 183–201.
41.
WossenTAbdoulayeTAleneA, et al. (2017) Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. Journal of Rural Studies54: 223–233.
42.
YangchenDCYangQHongM (2025) Labor-saving agricultural mechanization services and the technical efficiency in agricultural production: Evidence from Chinese rural households. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1600375.
43.
ZhangMLiuWMaQ (2025) The impact of labor constraints on production efficiency in protected vegetables: From the perspective of farm-work delays and technological substitution. Research of Agricultural Modernization46(4): 691–706.
44.
ZhangSSunZMaW, et al. (2020) The effect of cooperative membership on agricultural technology adoption in Sichuan, China. China Economic Review62: 101334.
45.
ZhangXYangQAl MamunA, et al. (2024) Acceptance of new agricultural technology among small rural farmers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04163-2.
46.
ZhaoDZhouH (2021) Livelihoods, technological constraints, and low-carbon agricultural technology preferences of farmers: Analytical frameworks of technology adoption and farmer livelihoods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(24): 13364.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
