Science historian James Burke, scientist turned writer Isaac Asimov and polymath Stuart Kauffman have all argued, from different angles, that technology is unavoidable, directional, combinatory, disruptive and unpredictable. They also highlight the unintended consequences of technology seeking to fix a problem and creating new problems and opportunities. Here I draw on their vision to outline these features of technology with a focus on sustainable agriculture and highlight their implications for investment in research and development, and connecting public policy and technological change.
AlstonJMNortonGWPardeyPG (1995) Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
AngusJFGracePR (2017) Nitrogen balance in Australia and nitrogen use efficiency on Australian farms. Soil Research55(5–6):435–450.
3.
AsimovI (1972) The God Themselves. London: Victor Gollancz.
4.
BalwinderSMcDonaldAJSrivastavaAK, et al. (2019) Tradeoffs between groundwater conservation and air pollution from agricultural fires in northwest India. Nature Sustainability2(7):580–583.
5.
ConnorDJ (2008a) Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crops Research106:187–190.
6.
ConnorDJ (2018b) Land required for legumes restricts the contribution of organic agriculture to global food security. Outlook in Agriculture47:277–282.
7.
ConnorDJ (2018c) Organic agriculture and food security: a decade of unreason finally implodes. Field Crops Research225:128–129.
8.
FischerRAConnorDJ (2018) Issues for cropping and agricultural science in the next 20 years. Field Crops Research222:121–142.
9.
GouldSJLloydEA (1999) Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection: How shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America96(21):11904–11909.
10.
HanelRKauffmanSAThurnerS (2005) Phase transition in random catalytic networks. Physical Review E72(3 Pt 2):036117.
11.
HeiseyPWFuglieKO (2018) Agricultural research investment and policy reform in high-income countries, ERR-249, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, May 2018.
12.
IyengarSMasseyDS (2019) Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116(16):7656–7661.
13.
KauffmanSA (2008) Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion. Philadelphia: Basic Books.
14.
KauffmanSA (2016) Humanity in a Creative Universe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
KauffmanSA (2019) A World Beyond Physics: The Emergence and Evolution of Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
LevineESpencerJLIsardSA, et al. (2002) Adaptation of the western corn rootworm to crop rotation: evolution of a new strain in response to a management practice. American Entomologist48(2):94–107.
17.
NollLCLeachAMSeufertV, et al. (2020) The nitrogen footprint of organic food in the United States. Environmental Research Letters15(4):11.
18.
OrrADonovanJStoianD (2017) Smallholder value chains as complex adaptive systems: a conceptual framework. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies8:14–33.
19.
OsmondCB (1995) Quintessential inefficiencies of plant bioenergetics: tales of two cultures. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology22:123–129.
20.
OtsukiT (2001) What price precaution? European harmonisation of aflatoxin regulations and African groundnut exports. European Review of Agricultural Economics28(3):263–284.
ProsserRSAndersonJCHansonML, et al. (2016) Indirect effects of herbicides on biota in terrestrial edge-of-field habitats: a critical review of the literature. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment232:59–72.
23.
RockströmJdeRouwA (1997) Water, nutrients and slope position in on-farm pearl millet cultivation in the Sahel. Plant and Soil195(2):311–327.
24.
SadrasVOCalderiniDFConnorDJ (2009) Sustainable agriculture and crop physiology. In: SadrasVOCalderiniDF (eds) Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 1–20.
25.
SadrasVOAlstonJMAphaloPJ, et al. (2020) Making science more effective for agriculture. Advances in Agronomy163:153–177.
26.
ShyamsundarPSpringerNPTallisH, et al. (2019) Fields on fire: alternatives to crop residue burning in India. Science365(6453):536–538.
