Transitioning to sustainable and green energy is a critical pathway to achieving long-term sustainable development. While substantial research has been conducted on renewable energy, a significant gap remains in examining the specific roles that women in politics, democracy, and patent innovations play in influencing RE adoption. This study aims to address this gap by exploring the impact of these factors on RE, with a focus on the United Kingdom as a case study, covering the period from 1997Q2 to 2021Q4. Employing a series of advanced wavelet-based quantile techniques, this research highlights the dynamic relationships between these variables across different quantiles and time scales. The results demonstrate that women in politics and patent innovations consistently promote the adoption of renewable energy across various quantiles and time scales. Democracy is found to have a positive influence on renewable energy in the short and long terms but exhibits a negative impact in the medium term. Research and development (R&D) yield mixed effects in the short and medium terms, yet show a robust positive impact on renewable energy in the long run. Surprisingly, economic growth appears to detract from renewable energy adoption across various quantiles and time scales. Based on these findings, the study advocates for policies that encourage greater female political participation, foster innovation through patents, strengthen democratic institutions, design more effective R&D incentives, and incorporate sustainability into economic policy frameworks. These recommendations are aligned with the achievement of SDGs 7, 9, 8, and 13.
AdebayoTSOlanrewajuVO. Journey toward affordable and modern energy: role of income inequality and technological innovation. Environ Prog Sustain Energy2025; 4: e14555.
2.
AndrewAALasisiTTMuonekeOB. Moderating roles of technological innovation and economic complexity in financial development-environmental quality nexus of the BRICS economies. Technol Soc2024; 78: 102581.
AcheampongAOOpokuEEORustagiN. Gender quota, women in politics, and gender parity in education. Econ Pol2024; 36: 1223–1260.
5.
OpokuEEOAcheampongAODzatorJ. Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate. Energy Econ2022; 109: 105942.
AkalinGErdoganS. Does democracy help reduce environmental degradation?Environ Sci Polluti Res2021; 28: 7226–7235.
8.
PovitkinaM. The limits of democracy in tackling climate change. Env Polit2018; 27: 411–432.
9.
KassouriYBilgiliFPeter Majok GarangA. Are government energy technology research, development, and demonstration budgets converging or diverging? Insights from OECD countries. Technol Anal Strategic Manage2022; 34: 563–577.
10.
Saeed MeoMEweadeBSÖzkanO. Examining the effects of solar energy innovations, information and communication technology and financial globalization on environmental quality in the United States via quantile-on-quantile KRLS analysis. Sol Energy2024; 272: 112450.
BilgiliFNathanielSPKuşkayaS,et al.Environmental pollution and energy research and development: an Environmental Kuznets Curve model through quantile simulation approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res2021; 28: 53712–53727.
14.
Zambrano-MonserrateMASubramaniamYAdnanN,et al.Dynamic factors driving PM2.5 concentrations: fresh evidence at the global level. Environ Pollut2024; 362: 124940.
15.
BourcetC. Empirical determinants of renewable energy deployment: a systematic literature review. Energy Econ2020; 85: 104563.
16.
IqbalSWangYAliS, et al.Shifting to a green economy: asymmetric macroeconomic determinants of renewable energy production in Pakistan. Renewable Energy2023; 202: 234–241.
17.
YanYKhanKAOlanrewajuVO. Unveiling energy efficiency and renewable electricity’s role in achieving sustainable development goals 7 and 13 policies. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol2024; 31: 497–522.
18.
ZhaoPLuZFangJ, et al.Determinants of renewable and non-renewable energy demand in China. Struct Change Econ Dyn2020; 54: 202–209.
19.
OzkanOEweadeBSUsmanO. Assessing the impact of resource efficiency, renewable energy R&D spending, and green technologies on environmental sustainability in Germany: evidence from a Wavelet Quantile-on-Quantile Regression. J Cleaner Prod2024; 450: 141992.
20.
BilgiliFAlsanusiMKabirMM,et al.Quantile dynamics of control of corruption, political stability, and renewable energy on environmental quality in the MENA region. Environ Dev Sustainability2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04504-w
21.
BilgiliFBalsalobre-LorenteDKuşkayaS, et al.Are research and development on energy efficiency and energy sources effective in the level of CO2 emissions? Fresh evidence from EU data. Environ Dev Sustainability2024; 26: 24183–24219.
22.
KirikkaleliDSowahJKJr. Modeling financial liberalization and economic growth in Liberia: a dynamic analysis. J Public Affairs2022; 22: e2593.
23.
AhmadUSUsmanMHussainS, et al.Determinants of renewable energy sources in Pakistan: an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 29183–29201.
24.
AkintandeOJOlubusoyeOEAdenikinjuAF,et al.Modeling the determinants of renewable energy consumption: evidence from the five most populous nations in Africa. Energy2020; 206: 117992.
25.
LiJZhangXAliS,et al.Eco-innovation and energy productivity: new determinants of renewable energy consumption. J Environ Manag2020; 271: 111028.
26.
ChishtiMZDoganE. Analyzing the determinants of renewable energy: the moderating role of technology and macroeconomic uncertainty. Energy Environ2024; 35: 874–903.
27.
IqbalSWangYAliS, et al.Asymmetric determinants of renewable energy production in Pakistan: do economic development. Environmental technology, and financial development matter?J Knowledge Economy2024; 15: 4097–4114.
28.
ChuLKGhoshSDoğanB, et al.Energy security as new determinant of renewable energy: the role of economic complexity in top energy users. Energy2023; 263: 125799.
29.
LawalAI. Determinants of renewable energy consumption in Africa: evidence from system GMM. Energies2023; 16: 2136.
30.
RaghutlaCKolatiY. Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of renewable energy: the role of political cooperation in China and India. Energy Rep2023; 10: 3092–3101.
31.
LiuFZhangXAwosusiAA. Asymmetric and moderating role of industrialisation and technological innovation on energy intensity: evidence from BRICS economies. Renewable Energy2022; 198: 1364–1372.
AdebayoTSÖzkanOUzun OzsahinD, et al.Exploring the role of ICT adoption technologies and renewable energy consumption in achieving a sustainable environment in the United States: an SDGs-based policy framework. Environ Sci Eur2025; 37: 20.
36.
SimNZhouH. Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles. J Bank Financ2015; 55: 1–8.
37.
OktayOEweadeBSAdebayoTS. Do energy efficiency R&D investments and information and communication technologies promote environmental sustainability in Sweden? A quantile-on-quantile KRLS investigation. J Clean Prod2024; 1: 13–29.
38.
PercivalDBWaldenAT. Wavelet methods for time series analysis. London, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
39.
BroockWAScheinkmanJADechertWD, et al. A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econom Rev1996; 15: 197–235.
40.
Olasehinde-WilliamsGÖzkanOAkadiriSS. Effects of climate policy uncertainty on sustainable investment: a dynamic analysis for the U.S. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023; 30: 55326–55339.
41.
ZhangHKhanKAEweadeBS. Role of eco-innovation and financial globalization on ecological quality in China: a wavelet analysis. Energy Environ2024: 0958305X241228518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X241228518
42.
ZhengXLiCAliS. Global chessboard: analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments. Risk Anal2024; 44: 2429–2447.
43.
PhillipsPCBPerronP. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika1988; 75: 335–346.
44.
DickeyDAFullerWA. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc1979; 74: 427–431.
45.
MechkovaVDahlumSPetrarcaCS. Women’s political representation, good governance and human development. Governance2024; 37: 19–38.
46.
LinBZhuJ. Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. J Environ Manag2019; 247: 662–671.
47.
BekunFVAlolaAA. Determinants of renewable energy consumption in agrarian sub-Sahara African economies. Energy Ecol Environ2022; 7: 227–235.
48.
ChenWLeiY. The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: new evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renewable Energy2018; 123: 1–14.
49.
GhoshSHossainMSVoumikLC, et al.Unveiling the spillover effects of democracy and renewable energy consumption on the environmental quality of BRICS countries: a new insight from different quantile regression approaches. Renewable Energy Focus2023; 46: 222–235.
50.
LvZ. The effect of democracy on CO2 emissions in emerging countries: does the level of income matter?Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017; 72: 900–906.
51.
Vanegas CantareroMM. Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: a roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries. Energy Res Soc Sci2020; 70: 101716.
52.
SultanaTHossainMSVoumikLC,et al.Democracy, green energy, trade, and environmental progress in South Asia: advanced quantile regression perspective. Heliyon2023; 9: e20488.
BatoolZRazaSMFAliS,et al.ICT, renewable energy, financial development, and CO2 emissions in developing countries of East and South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 35025–35035.
55.
NaqviSAAShahSARAnwarS,et al.Renewable energy, economic development, and ecological footprint nexus: fresh evidence of renewable energy environment Kuznets curve (RKC) from income groups. Environ Sci Pollut Res2021; 28: 2031–2051.
56.
da SilvaPPCerqueiraPAOgbeW. Determinants of renewable energy growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from panel ARDL. Energy2018; 156: 45–54.
57.
AmeliNBrandtN. Determinants of households’ investment in energy efficiency and renewables: evidence from the OECD survey on household environmental behaviour and attitudes. Environ Res Lett2015; 10: 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044015
