Improving the water footprint (WFP) of crops through the implementation of water harvesting techniques (WHT) can help save water and enhance crop production. This study investigated the impact of different WHTs on the green, blue and total WFP components of sorghum production in Western Sudan. Water harvesting was used as a tool for reducing water consumption and minimizing the WFP in two consecutive rainy seasons in 2012 and 2013. The average WFP for sorghum was estimated to be 1100 m3 ton−1, with the green component providing the highest contribution. According to WFP analysis there were significant differences between WHT treatments (p ≤ 0.05) with tide ridging providing the greatest reduction (79%) compared to other treatments including ridging (71%) and basin (58%), respectively. A similar trend was found regarding soil moisture, fresh, dry matter and productivity (yield). The blue water component has an important impact on the total WFP for sorghum production.
AbdelhadiASalihAYosifM. (2002) Effect of water harvesting methods on sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) yield in the Butana area, Sudan. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Crop Water Management for Food Production under Limited Water Supplies, Montreal, Canada, July 21–28, 2002, pp. 17–24.
2.
Abdel-MotagallyF (2010) Evaluation of water use efficiency under different water regimes in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Monech). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences6(5):499–505.
3.
AdilBKHassanIMHaithamRE. (2012) Effects of some in-situ water harvesting techniques on soil moisture and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) production in Northern Gedaref State. Global Journal of Plant Ecophysiology2(1):54–66.
4.
AhmedSMAdeebA (2014) Topsoiling and subsoiling as rainwater harvesting techniques for arid climates: a case study from Sudan. Planet@ Risk2(1):1–6.
5.
AhmedSMRibbeL (2011) Analysis of water footprints of rainfed and irrigated crops in Sudan. Journal of Natural Resources and Development1(1):1–9.
6.
AllenRGPruittWOWrightJL. (2006) A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETO by the FAO56 Penman–Monteith method. Agricultural Water Management81(1):1–22.
7.
CaoXCWuPTWangYB. (2014) Assessing blue and green water utilisation in wheat production of China from the perspectives of water footprint and total water use. Hydrology Earth System Sciences18(8):3165–3178.
8.
CapraAScicoloneB (2004) Emitter and filter tests for wastewater reuse by drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management68(2):135–149.
9.
DoorenbosJKassamAH (1979) Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation.
10.
DuanPQinLWangY. (2015), Spatial pattern characteristics of water footprint for maize production in Northeast China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture96(2):561–568.
11.
EliasESalihAAlailyF (2001) Cracking patterns in the vertisols of the Sudan Gezira at the end of dry season. International Agrophysics15(3):151–156.
12.
ErcinAEHoekstraAY (2014) Water footprint scenarios for 2050: a global analysis. Environment International64:71–82.
13.
FAO (2006) Fertilizer Use by Crop in the Sudan. Land and Plant Nutrition and Management Service. Rome: Land and Water Development Division.
14.
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Food Program (FAO/WFP) (2000) Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission to Sudan. Special Report. Rome: FAO.
15.
GardnerCMKLaryeaKBUngerPW (1999) Soil Physical Constraints to Plant Growth and Crop Production. Rome: Land and Water Development Division, FAO.
16.
HassanIMAdilBKHaithamRE. (2012) Performance of soil moisture retention and conservation tillage techniques as indicated by sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) yield and yield components. Global Journal of Plant Ecophysiology2(1):31–43.
17.
HoekstraAChapagainAAldayaM. (2009) Water Footprint Manual, State of the Art. Netherlands: Water Footprint Network.
18.
HoekstraAYChapagainAK (2008) Globalization of water: Sharing the Planet’s Freshwater Resources. Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
KhalilIA (2008) Dry Farming in Crops and Cropping in Pakistan. Islamabad: Higher Education Commission.
20.
MekonnenMHoekstraA (2010) The Green, Blue and Grey Water Footprint of Crops and Derived Crop Products. Vol 1: Main Report. Value of water research report series No. 47. Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education.
21.
MichaelAM (1978) Irrigation: Theory and Practice. 1st ed. New Delhi: VIKAS Publishing House Ltd.
22.
Mohamed-AliSLuster-TeasleySNzewiE (2009) Water resources in Sudan: enhancing rainfall harvesting methods for water supply. In: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009: Great Rivers. ASCE, pp. 2300–2310.
23.
MotsiKChumaEMukamuriB (2004) Rainwater harvesting for sustainable agriculture in communal lands of Zimbabwe. Physics and Chemistry of Earth Parts A/B/C29(15):1069–1073.
PahlowMSnowballJFraserG (2015) Water footprint assessment to inform water management and policy making in South Africa. Water SA41(3):300–313.
26.
RajanBKheraKLAroraS (2004) Effect of tillage and mulching on yield of corn in the submontaneous rainfed region of Punjab, India. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology6(1):1–3.
27.
ReddyBKumarAARameshS. (2011) Breeding sorghum for coping with climate change. In: YadavSSReddenBHatfi eldJL. (eds) Crop Adaptation to Climate Change. Iowa: Wiley, pp. 326–339.
28.
UN (2011) World Population Prospects. The 2010 Revision. ROM ed. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division;
29.
VanhamDBidoglioG (2013) A review on the indicator water footprint for the EU28 . Ecological Indicators26:61–75.
30.
VohlandKBarryB (2009) A review of in situ rainwater harvesting (RWH) practices modifying landscape functions in African Drylands. Agricultural & Ecosystems Environment131(1):119–127.
31.
WalterMDavidLSteveT (2006) Soil-water conservation and rainwater harvesting strategies in the semi-arid Mzingwane Catchment, Limpopo Basin. Zimbabwe. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C31(15):893–900.
