This article investigates the evolution of capital executions in modern Japan, focusing primarily on two major aspects: the reform of execution methods to reduce physical suffering, and the implementation of measures to preserve the confidentiality of executions. These aspects created a notable distance between public awareness and the realities of death penalty, particularly regarding actual executions. Consequently, calls for abolition gradually shifted from concerns about the suffering of death-row inmates to societal issues and abstract theoretical considerations. Although reform efforts were generally viewed as progressive, they did not lead to a significant reduction in the state’s reliance on the death penalty. On the contrary, the public’s detachment from the death penalty contributed to the persistence of the practice.
BoissonadeG. E. (nd). Notes on criminal law. (Keihō Kōgi Hikki) (K. Teijirō, Trans).
2.
BoissonadeG. E. (1886). Annotations to the draft penal code (keihō sōan chūshaku jō). (J. Mori, & J. K. Nakamura, trans.). Shihōshō.
3.
BotsmanD. (2005). Punishment and power in the making of modern Japan. Princeton University Press.
4.
“Breaking the Noose of Execution. (1896). “Breaking the Noose of Execution” (Shikei shikkō no kōjyō danzetsu). Kangokuzasshi [Bulletin of Penitentiary], 7(3), 60.
5.
Cabinet Gazette Bureau (Naikaku Kanpōkyoku). (1974). Compendium of laws and orders (hōrei zensho) (3). Harashobo. (Original work published 1870).
Editorial Board. (1907). Regarding criminal law revisions (keihō kaiseian nitsuite). Kangoku kyōkai zasshi [Bulletin of the Society of Penitentiary], 20(2), 1–30.
10.
FuseT. (1921). Death penalty abolition [In Japanese]. (shikei haishiron). Chūō Hōritsu Shinpō [The Central Legal News], 1(11), 10–13.
11.
FuseY. (2014a). Secret Cruelty of Death by Hanging: A Study of Execution in Japan and the U.S.A (1) [In Japanese]. (Nichi-Bei no shikei shikkō o meguru tōmeisei ni kansuru ikkōsatsu: Kōshukei no zankyaku-sei o chūshin ni (1)). Ryukoku Law Review, 47(1), 271–316.
12.
FuseY. (2014b). Secret Cruelty of Death by Hanging: A Study of Execution in Japan and the U.S.A (2) [In Japanese]. (Nichi-Bei no shikei shikkō o meguru tōmeisei ni kansuru ikkōsatsu: Kōshukei no zankyaku-sei o chūshin ni (2)). Ryukoku Law Review, 47(2), 599–646.
13.
Grand Council of State. (1873). Inquiry regarding the Procedure in Case of Survival of Executed Individuals (kōzainin sosei no gi ni tsuki ukagai). Records of Official Documents (Kobun Roku) (KO00900100). National Archives of Japan, Retrieved July 20, 2024. https://www.digital.archives.go.jp/img/3042189.
14.
Grand Council of State (Dajō-kan). (1873). Diagram of the amended device for the execution of capital punishment (kōzai kikai zushiki kaisei) (Edict No. 65). Grand Council of state categories of Regulations (dajō ruiten) 1872–1877 (DA00580100). National Archives of Japan, Retrieved July 20, 2024. https://www.digital.archives.go.jp/img/1395701
15.
HanaiT. (1921). Shikei wa akukei nari (The death penalty is a bad punishment). Chūō hōritsu shinpō [The Central Legal News], 1(7), 4–6.
16.
HasegawaN. (1935). Shikei ga muzai ni (Death sentence turned to acquittal). Yomiuri, 1.
17.
HoshijimaJ. (1921). Shikei to Yamada Ken (The death penalty and Yamada Ken). Chūō hōritsu shinpō [The Central Legal News], 1(7), 13.
18.
IshīR. (1964). Punishments in the Edo Period (Edo no keibatsu). Chūōkōron.
ItoT. (2010). Social History of the Death Penalty: Early Modern and Modern Japan, Europe and America. [In Japanese]. (Shikei no shakaishi: Kinsei kindai nippon to ōbei). In TomiyaI. (Ed.), Higashiajia no shikei (capital punishment in East Asia) (pp. 257–297). Kyoto University Press.
21.
JeonB.-M. (2021). A study on the Operation and Actual Condition of the Death Penalty System during the Japanese Colonial Period [In Korean]. Il Je Gang Jeom Gi Sa Hyeong Je Do Ui Un Yeong Gwa Sil Tae: Sa Hyeong Tong Gye Ja Ryo Wa Sa Hyeong Jip Haeng Eul Jung Sim Eu Ro. Yeoksa Yeongu [Journal of History], 40(1), 141–179. https://doi.org/10.31552/jh.2021.01.40.141
22.
JohnsonD. T. (2020). The culture of capital punishment in Japan. Springer.
23.
KamiyaR. (1907). I Hope for the Abolition of the Death Penalty [In Japanese]. (Shikei no haishi o nozomu), Kangoku kyōkai zasshi [Bulletin of the Society of Penitentiary], 20(2), 28–32.
24.
KatzP. (2005). When valleys turned blood red: The Ta-pa-ni incident in colonial Taiwan. University of Hawaii Press.
25.
KimG. (1970). Thirty years in the legal field (beop chang 30 Nyeon). Beop Jeong press.
26.
KinaseR. (1907). My Opinion on the Amendment to the Penal Code [In Japanese]. (Keihō kaiseian nitsuite no shokan), Kangoku kyōkai zasshi [Bulletin of the Society of Penitentiary], 20(2), 127–135.
27.
Meiji Institute for Research on Legal and Economic History (Meiji hōsei keizaishi kenkyūjo). (1968). Notes of the Chamber of Elders Meeting, Early Period (Genrōin kaigi hikki zenki) (3) Genrōin Kaigi Hikki Kankōkai.
MoynS. (2022). Humane: How the United States abandoned Peace and reinvented war. Verso.
30.
NagataK. (2019). The Proclamation of “Kozai Kikai Zushiki (Drawing of the Gallows)” and the Practice of Building Gallows: Material for Executions by Judicial Hangings at the Beginning of the Meiji Era (around 1873) [In Japanese]. (Kōzaikikai zushiki no hanpu to kōzaikikai no setchi jitsumu: Meiji shoki no kōshukei no shikkō o meguru shiryō o yomitoku). The Law Review of Kansai University, 68(5), 93–158.
31.
NagataK. (2021). The Trend of Death Sentences in the Early Meiji Era (between 1868 and 1878): Based on the All Capital Cases in “The History of Kyoto Prefecture” (1) [In Japanese]. (meiji shoki no shikei senkoku no dōkō: kyōto fushi tōsai no zen shikei senkoku jiken o sozai n). The Law Review of Kansai University, 71(1), 1–35.
32.
NoguchiK. (1921). Regarding Methods of Execution (shikei shikkō no hōhō nitsuite). Yamaoka mannosuke document (E-214), Ministry of Justice Library.
33.
OgawaH. (1874). The outline of the new code, revised and supplemented penal code, combined edition with comparison (shinritsu Kōryō kaitei ritsurei TaibigoKan). Ogawa Hanshichi.
34.
OgawaS. (1900). Death Penalty Abolition [In Japanese]. (Haishikeiron), Kangoku kyōkai zasshi [Bulletin of the Society of Penitentiary], 13(2), 3–9.
35.
OginoF. (2023). The Peace preservation law in Taiwan. Rikka Press.
36.
OharaS. (1891). A Speech by Former Senate Councilor Shigeya Ohara (Moto genrōin gikan Ohara Shigeya kun kōwa). Dai nippon kangoku kyōkai zasshi [Bulletin of the Society of Penitentiary of the Great Japan], 43(1), 37–42.
37.
OkakumaH. (1907). Regarding the Amendment to the Penal Code [In Japanese]. (Keihō kaiseian nitsukete), Kangoku kyōkai zasshi [Bulletin of the Society of Penitentiary], 20(2), 109–110.
38.
PrattJ. (2001). Punishment and civilization. Sage.
39.
RinerR. C. (2016). Confronting the death penalty: How language influences jurors in capital cases. Oxford University Press.
40.
SakuraiS. (2012). Transition of the Way of Executions and the Relationship between Physical Distance and Emotional One [In Japanese]. (shikei shikkō hōhō no hensen to butsuri teki / kanjō teki kyori no kankei). Seizongaku kenkyū sentā hōkoku [Report Issued by the Research Center for Ars Vivendi of Ritsumeikan University], 17(1), 130–149.
41.
SaratA. (2001). Killing Me Softly: Capital Punishment and the Technologies for Taking Life. In SaratA. (Ed.), Pain, death, and the law (pp. 43–70). University of Michigan Press.
42.
ShigematsuK. (1979). Evolution and Explanation of Modern Prison Regulations (Kindai kangokusoku no suī to kaisetsu). Hokuju.
43.
Society of History Enthusiasts (Dōkōshidankai). (1927). A Casual Discussion on the Early Meiji Era (Mandan meiji shonen). Shunyodo.
44.
SpierenburgP. (2008). The spectacle of suffering: Executions and the evolution of repression from a preindustrial metropolis to the European experience. Cambridge University Press.
45.
Statistics Bureau of the Taiwan Provincial Governor’s Office. (1946). Table no. 186: Number of prisoners admitted and released over the years (linian shouxingren rujian chujian shu). Statistical Summary of the Past Fifty-One Years of Taiwan Province (1894–1945), Retrieved June 13, 2024. https://twstudy.iis.sinica.edu.tw/TwStatistic50/
Taiwan Governor-General’s Legal Affairs Department (Taiwan sōtokufu hōmubu). (1920). A Brief History of Riots in Taiwan (Taiwan hiran shōshi). Tainan Shinpō Shikyoku Insatsubu.
48.
TakigawaM. (1972). History of penal administration in Japan (nihon gyōkeishi). Seiabo Press.
49.
TanakaM. (1907). Critique of the Amendment to the Penal Code [In Japanese]. (Keihō kaiseian nitaisuru hihyō), Kangoku kyōkai zasshi [Bulletin of the Society of Penitentiary], 20(2), 105–109.
50.
TanakaN. (2023). The death penalty should Be abolished (shikei subekaraku haisubeshi). Heibonsha.
51.
TanakaS. (1921). Regarding the Issue of the Death Penalty [In Japanese]. (Shikei mondai nitsuite). Chūō hōritsu shinpō [The Central Legal News], 1(7), 23.
52.
TezukaY. (1956). History of criminal law in the early Meiji period (Meiji shoki keihōshi no kenkyū). Keio University Press.
53.
The Completion of the Execution Ground. (1893). “The Completion of the Execution Ground” (Kozijō no rakusei). Kangokuzasshi [Bulletin of Penitentiary], 4(8), 61.
54.
ToyoharaT. (1911). Compilation of Prison Laws and Regulations (Kangoku hōrei ruisan). Kangoku Kyōkai.
55.
TsukazakiT. (1933). Debate Between Hosei University and Rikkyo University: Is the Death Penalty Justified? (Hōseidaigaku tairitsu gaku tōronkai shikei ze ka ina ka). Yūben [Persuasiveness], 24(12), 60–79.
56.
Urawa Penitentiary Seminar (Urawa kangoku kōshūkai). (1907). A Few Humble Opinions on the Amendment to the Penal Code [In Japanese]. (Keihō kaiseian nitaisuru guken no nisan). Kangoku kyōkai zasshi [Bulletin of the Society of Penitentiary], 20(2), 61–69.
57.
Waseda University Tsuruta Society of Studies in Historical Documents. (Tsuruta Bunsho Kenkyūkai). (1976) Minutes of the Meetings on the Draft of the Japanese Penal Code (Nippon keihō sōan kaigi hikki) (1). Waseda University Press.
58.
XieX. (2024). The Horror of Capital Punishment: Body, Artifact and Sensibility in Chinese Executions by Strangulation and Hanging, 1906–1948 [In Chinese]. (sixing zhi can: jindai Zhongguo jiaoxing zhong de renti, qixie yu ganjue, 1906–1948). Zhongyang yanjiuyuan jindaishi yanjiusuo jikan [Bulletin of the Institute ofModern History Academia Sinica], 124, 1–48.
59.
YamaguchiJ. (1919). A Retrospective of Twenty Years [In Japanese]. (Kaiko ni jū nen). Taihō Geppō [Journal of Taiwan Law], 13(10), 7–15.
60.
YoshidaM. (2012). Research on the criminal law of sendai domain (sendaihan keijihō no kenkyū). Jigaku Press.
