Quantitative analysis via bibliometric field analyses is a recent, gradually emerging method. We conducted a bibliometric study to investigate the authors’ scientific influence and contributions and evaluate trends and research foci in good death-related literature using the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection. A total of 1,157 publications were selected for the analysis. There was a significant increase in annual publications per year (R2 = 0.79). The publication (317, 27.4%) and average citation (29.2) numbers were highest in the USA. Controlling for population number and GDP, the Netherlands had the highest number of articles per million persons (5.89) and US$ 1010 GDP (1.02). North American and Western European countries are leaders in the field, but some East Asian countries (Japan and Taiwan) perform well. Current research focuses on patient perspectives of good death and advance care planning among patients, families, and health care providers.
BirkleC.PendleburyD. A.SchnellJ.AdamsJ. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
2.
BoveroA.GottardoF.BottoR.TosiC.SelvaticoM.TortaR. (2020). Definition of a good death, attitudes toward death, and feelings of interconnectedness among people taking care of terminally ill patients with cancer: An exploratory study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 37(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909119883835
3.
ChenS.LuQ.BaiJ.DengC.WangY.ZhaoY. (2020). Global publications on stigma between 1998-2018: A bibliometric analysis. J Affect Disord, 274, 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.006
EckN. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ArXiv, abs/1109.2058.
6.
GhamariH.GolshanyN.Naghibi RadP.BehzadiF. (2021). Neuroarchitecture assessment: An overview and bibliometric analysis. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ, 11(4), 1362–1387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11040099
7.
GlareP.VirikK.JonesM.HudsonM.EychmullerS.SimesJ.ChristakisN (2003). A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. Bmj, 327(7408), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7408.195
8.
GotoY.MiuraH. (2022). Using the soft systems methodology to link healthcare and long-term care delivery systems: A case study of community policy coordinator activities in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148462
9.
Granda-CameronC.HouldinA. (2012). Concept analysis of good death in terminally ill patients. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 29(8), 632–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909111434976
10.
HartoghdG. (2017). Suffering and dying well: On the proper aim of palliative care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 20(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9764-3
HupceyJ. E.PenrodJ.FenstermacherK. (2009). Review article: A model of palliative care for heart failure. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 26(5), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909109333935
KimM. C.ChenC. (2015). A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems. Scientometrics, 104(1), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1595-5
15.
KrikorianA.MaldonadoC.PastranaT. (2020). Patient's perspectives on the notion of a good death: A systematic review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manage, 59(1), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.033
16.
LiuJ.LiuS.ShiQ.WangM. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of nursing informatics research. Stud Health Technol Inform, 284, 47–49. https://doi.org/10.3233/shti210661
17.
ManiuI.CosteaR.ManiuG.NeamtuB. M. (2021). Inflammatory biomarkers in febrile seizure: A comprehensive bibliometric, review and visualization analysis. Brain sci, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11081077
18.
McCaughanD.RomanE.SmithA. G.GarryA.JohnsonM.PatmoreR.HowardM.HowellD. A (2018). Determinants of hospital death in haematological cancers: Findings from a qualitative study. BMJ Support Palliat Care, 8(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001289
QinY.ChenS.ZhangY.LiuW.LinY.ChiX.ChenX.YuZ.SuD (2021). A bibliometric analysis of endoscopic sedation research: 2001-2020. Front Med (Lausanne), 8(775495). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.775495
21.
SeamarkD. A.SeamarkC. J.HalpinD. M. (2007). Palliative care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A review for clinicians. J R Soc Med, 100(5), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680710000512
22.
SteinhauserK. E.ClippE. C.McNeillyM.ChristakisN. A.McIntyreL. M.TulskyJ. A. (2000). In search of a good death: Observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med, 132(10), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00011
23.
SunH. L.BaiW.LiX. H.HuangH.CuiX. L.CheungT.SuZ. H.YuanZ.NgC. H.XiangY. T (2022). Schizophrenia and inflammation research: A bibliometric analysis. Front Immunol, 13(907851). https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.907851
24.
TenoJ. M.ClarridgeB. R.CaseyV.WelchL. C.WetleT.ShieldR.MorV (2004). Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. Jama, 291(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.1.88
25.
TipwongA.RuamsookT.HongkittiyanonT.KgowsiriK. (2022). The perceptions on good death of the older adults in the semi-urban community: A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Sci, 9(3), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.001
van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
28.
VittoriA.CascellaM.LeonardiM.MonacoF.NocerinoD.CuomoA.OttaianoA.PerriF.MasciliniI.FranciaE.PetrucciE.MarinangeliF.PicardoS. G. (2022). VOSviewer-based bibliometric network analysis for evaluating research on juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome (JPFS). Children (Basel), 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050637
29.
WangL.XiaE.LiH.WangW. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of crowdsourcing in the field of public health. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203825
30.
WeiN.HuY.LiuG.LiS.YuanG.ShouX.ZhangX.ShiJ.ZhaiH (2022). A bibliometric analysis of familial hypercholesterolemia from 2011 to 2021. Curr Probl Cardiol, 101151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101151
31.
XieL.ChenZ.WangH.ZhengC.JiangJ. (2020). Bibliometric and visualized analysis of scientific publications on atlantoaxial spine surgery based on Web of science and VOSviewer. World Neurosurg, 137, 435–442.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171
32.
YuanM.LinH.WuH.YuM.TuJ.LüY. (2021). Community engagement in public health: A bibliometric mapping of global research. Arch Public Health, 79(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00525-3
33.
ZhangB.WrightA. A.HuskampH. A.NilssonM. E.MaciejewskiM. L.EarleC. C.BlockS. D.MaciejewskiP. K.PrigersonH. G (2009). Health care costs in the last week of life: Associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med, 169(5), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2008.587
34.
ZhangF.WangR.LiuB.ZhangL. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of autophagy in atherosclerosis from 2012 to 2021. Front Pharmacol, 13(977870). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.977870
