Research in Terror Management Theory finds that close interpersonal relationships (e.g., parents, romantic partners) mitigate threat reactions to reminders of mortality. Parasocial relationships (imagined relationships with media personalities) afford many of the same benefits as interpersonal relationships. Do these benefits extend to mortality concerns? We investigated whether those with strong parasocial attachments were differentially influenced by reminders of death. Results showed that those with strong parasocial relationships had more defensive reactions to a mortality prime, suggesting that such attachments may not afford the same existential benefits given by close human others and may instead indicate a heightened vulnerability.
BakkerM.WichertsJ. M. (2014). Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the type I error rate in independent samples t tests: The power of alternatives and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 19(3), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000014
2.
BeckerE. (1973). The denial of death. Free Press.
3.
BoonS.LomoreC. (2001). Admirer-celebrity relationships among young adults: Explaining perceptions of celebrity influence on identity. Human Communication Research, 27(3), 432-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00788.x
4.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. In: Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic.
5.
BrownW. J. (2015). Examining four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transporation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship. Communication Theory, 25(3), 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12053
6.
BurkeB. L.MartensA.FaucherE. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 155-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352321
7.
CastanoE. (2004). In case of death, cling to the ingroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(4), 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.211
8.
ChangP. F.ChoiY. H.BazarovaN. N.LöckenhoffC. E. (2015). Age differences in online social networking: extending socioemotional selectivity theory to social network sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029126
9.
CohenJ. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041374
10.
ColeT.LeetsL. (1999). Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: Insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(4), 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599164005
11.
CoxC. R.ArndtJ. (2012). How sweet it is to be loved by you: The role of perceived regard in the terror management of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025947
12.
CoxC. R.ArndtJ.PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.AbdollahiA.SolomonS. (2008). Terror management and adult’s attachment to their parents: The safe haven remains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 696-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.696
13.
DerrickJ. L.GabrielS.HugenbergK. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 352-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003
14.
DerrickJ. L.GabrielS.TippinB. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15(2), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00197.x
15.
DibbleJ. L.HartmannT.RosaenS. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
16.
Erceg-HurnD. M.MirosevichV. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591.
17.
EyalK.CohenJ. (2006). When good friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(3), 502-523. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
19.
FinchE. C.IverachL.MenziesR. G.JonesM. (2016). Terror mismanagement: Evidence that mortality salience exacerbates attentional bias in social anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 30(7), 1370-1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1065794
20.
FlorianV.MikulincerM.HirschbergerG. (2002). The anxiety-beuffering function of close relationships: Evidence that relationship commitment acts as a terror management mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.527
21.
FritscheI.JonasE.AblasserC.BeyerM.KubanJ.MangerA.-M.SchultzM. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.014
22.
GilesD. C.MaltbyJ. (2004). The role of media figures in adolescent development: Relations between autonomy, attachment, and interest in celebrities. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 813-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00154-5
23.
GoldenbergJ. L.PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.KluckB.CornwellR. (2001). I am not an animal: Mortality salience, disgust, and the denial of human creatureliness. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 130, 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.427.
24.
GreenbergJ.KosloffS.SolomonS.CohenF.LandauM. (2010). Toward understanding the fame game: The effect of mortality salience on the appeal of fame. Self and Identity, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860802391546
25.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.RosenblattA.VeederM.KirklandS.LyonD. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308
26.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.SimonL.BreusM. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.627
27.
GreenwoodD. N.LongC. R. (2009). Psychological predictors of media involvement: Solitude experiences and the need to belong. Communication Research, 36(5), 637-654.
28.
Harmon-JonesE.SimonL.GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.McGregorH. (1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduces mortality salience effects. Journal or Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.24
29.
HartJ.ShaverP. R.GoldenbergJ. L. (2005). Attachment, self-esteem, worldviews, and terror management: Evidence for a tripartite security system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 999-1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.999
30.
HayesJ.SchimelJ. (2018). Unintended effects of measuring implicit processes: The case of death-thought accessibility in mortality salience studies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.005.
31.
HayesJ.SchimelJ.ArndtJ.FaucherE. H. (2010). A theoretical and empirical review of the death-thought accessibility concept in terror management research. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 699-739. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020524
IverachL.MenziesR. G.MenziesR. E. (2014). Death anxiety and its role in psychopathology: Reviewing the status of a transdiagnostic construct. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(7), 580-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.09.002
34.
JonasE.FritscheI.GreenbergJ. (2005). Currencies as cultural symbols – an existential psychological perspective on reactions to Germans toward the Euro. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.02.003
35.
KeeferL. A.LandauM. J.SullivanD. (2014). Non-human support: Broadening the scope of attachment theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 524-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12129
36.
KlimmtC.HartmannT.SchammH. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In BryantJ.VordererP. (Eds.), Psychology of Entertainment (pp. 291-314). New York: Routledge.
37.
LansfordJ. E.ShermanA. M.AntonucciT. C. (1998). Satisfaction with social networks: An examination of socioemotional selectivity theory across cohorts. Psychology and Aging, 13(4), 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.544
38.
LouC.KimH. K. (2019). Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents’ parasocial relationship, materialism, and purchase intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2567), 2567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567
39.
MadisonT. P.PorterL. V.GreuleA. (2016). Parasocial compensation hypothesis: Predictors of using parasocial relationships to compensate for real-life interaction. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 35(3), 258-279.
40.
MikulincerM.FlorianV. (2000). Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience: Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.2.260
41.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
42.
PlusninN.PeppingC. A.KashimaE. S. (2018). The role of close relationships in terror management: A systematic review and research agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(4), 307-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317753505
43.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.ArndtJ.SchimelJ. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 435-468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435
44.
PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.GreenbergJ. (2015). Thirty years of terror management theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.03.001.
45.
RosaenS. F.DibbleJ. L. (2016). Clarifying the role of attachment and social compensation on parasocial relationships with television characters. Communication Studies, 67(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1121898
46.
RosenbergM (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
47.
RubinA. M.PerseE. M.PowellR. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
48.
SemmlerS. M. (2016). The existential function of parasocial relationship interaction. In HarvellL. A.NisbettG. S. (Eds.), Denying death: An interdisciplinary approach to terror management theory (pp. 90-102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641393-7
49.
TukachinskyR. (2010). Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3(1/2), 73-94. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/comm_articles/19/.
50.
WangQ.FinkE. L.CaiD. A. (2008). Loneliness, gender, and parasocial interaction: A uses and gratifications approach. Communication Quarterly, 56(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701839057
WilcoxR. R. (2016). Comparing dependent robust correlations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 69(3), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12069
53.
YoungA. F.GabrielS.HollarJ. L. (2013). Batman to the rescue! the protective effects of parasocial relationships with muscular superheroes on men's body image. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.003
54.
YoungA. F.GabrielS.SechristG. B. (2012). The skinny on celebrities: Parasocial relationships moderate the effects of thin media figures on women’s body image. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 659-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434785
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
