Exploring the Existential Implications of COVID-19 in Health Communication

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provided an existential threat the world has rarely seen and forced Americans to make meaning in a world of uncertainty surrounding what most have taken for granted, being healthy. Reviewing data from several studies collected throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, this article uses COVID-19 as a case study to understand reasoning to follow (or not) the recommendations set forth by government agencies through understanding the effects of longitudinal death salience (i.e., long-term awareness of death). The Terror Management Health Model (TMHM) argues that death is a key component to the condition of human behavior to elongate life. If the TMHM is correct, then Americans should have widely followed government recommendations, but instead violence and a polarized America ensued. Implications for health communication and the TMHM are discussed, providing a path forward for health communication and existential psychology scholars.

Keywords

advocacy COVID-19 terror management theory Terror Management Health Model health communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arndt

Goldenberg

J. L.

(2017). Where health and death intersect: Insights from a terror management health model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416689563

Aschwanden

Strickhouser

J. E.

Sesker

A. A.

Lee

J. H.

Luchetti

Stephan

Sutin

A. R.

Terracciano

(2021). Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality. European Journal of Personality, 35(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2281

Bessarabova

Massey

Z. B.

(2020). Testing terror management health model and integrating its predictions with the theory of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 87(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.16269224

Betsch

Korn

Sprengholz

Felgendreff

Eitze

Schmid

Böhm

(2020). Social and behavioral consequences of mask policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 117(36), 21851–21853. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011674117

Bowater

(2020). Opinion: How to advocate effectively in the age of COVID-19. https://advocacyaccelerator.org/opinion-how-to-advocate-effectively-in-the-age-of-covid-19/

Brehm

J. W.

(1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.

Bokemper

S. E.

Huber

G. A.

Gerber

A. S.

James

E. K.

Omer

S. B.

(2021). Timing of COVID-19 vaccine approval and endorsement by public figures. Vaccine, 39(5), 825–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.048

Chan

C. D.

Litam

S. D. A.

(2021). Mental health equity of Filipino communities in COVID-19: A framework for practice and advocacy. The Professional Counselor, 11(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.15241/cdc.11.1.73

Chappell

(2020). “Please don’t politicize this virus” WHO head says after Trump threatens funding. NPR. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/04/08/829944795/please-don-t-politicize-this-virus-who-head-says-after-trump-threatens-funding

10.

Cline

R. J. W.

(2003). Everyday interpersonal communication and health. In Thompson

T. L.

Dorsey

A. M.

Miller

K. I.

Parrott

(Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 285–313). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

11.

Courtney

E. P.

Goldenberg

J. L.

Boyd

. (2020). The contagion of mortality: A terror management health model for pandemics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12392

12.

DeFranza

Lindow

Harrison

Mishra

(2021). Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines. American Psychologist, 76(5), 744–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000717

13.

Dhawan

Bekalu

Pinnamaneni

McCloud

Viswanath

(2021). COVID-19 news and misinformation: Do the matter for public health prevention? Journal of Health Communication, 26(11), 799–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.2010841

14.

Dillard

J. P.

Tian

Cruz

S. M.

Smith

R. A.

Shen

(2023). Persuasive messages, social norms, and reactance: A study of masking behavior during a COVID-19 campus health campaign. Health Communication, 38(7), 1338–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2007579

15.

Dimoff

J. D.

Dao

A. N.

Mitchell

Olson

(2021). Live free and die: Expanding the terror management health model for pandemics to account for psychological reactance. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(3), e12585. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12585

16.

Ernest Becker Foundation (2022). Death anxiety and social change: A communications guide for advocates. Brochure

17.

First

J. M.

Shin

Ranjit

Y. S.

Houston

J. B.

(2020). COVID-19 stress and depression: Examining social media, traditional media, and interpersonal communication. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 26(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1835386

18.

Gao

Zheng

Jia

Chen

Mao

Chen

Wang

Dai

(2020). Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS One, 15(4), e0231924. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231924

19.

Goldenberg

J. L.

Arndt

(2008). The implications of death for health: A terror management health model for behavioral health promotion. Psychological Review, 115(4), 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013326

20.

Greenberg

Pyszczynski

Solomon

(1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In Baumeister’s

(Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). Springer Series in Social Psychology.

21.

Guo

Saxton

G. D.

(2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012471585

22.

Hameleers

Humprecht

Möller

Lühring

(2023). Degrees of deception: The effects of different types of COVID-19 misinformation and the effectiveness of corrective information in crisis times. Information, Communication, & Society, 26(9), 1699–1715. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2021270

23.

Hansen

Winzeler

Topolinski

(2010). When the death makes you smoke: A terror management perspective on the effectiveness of cigarette on-pack warnings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 226–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.007

24.

Harvell-Bowman

L. A.

Gilmore

G. R.

Baillargeon

Dunn

Montwill

Coffindaffer

(2022). America shut down: The impact of endless mortality salience, social media use, and political ideology on health perceptions at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Presented Virtually at the Annual Meeting of the Existential Psychology Preconference at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Francisco, CA.

25.

Harvell-Bowman

L. A.

Gilmore

G. R.

Ferrell

Klein

Nassif

Coffindaffer

Montwill

(2021). Analyzing social media usage and the causes and effects of existential and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Presented Virtually at the Annual Meeting of the Existential Psychology Preconference at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, online.

26.

Heffner

Vives

M-L.

FeldmanHall

(2021). Emotional responses to prosocial messages increase willingness to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110420

27.

Houston

J. B.

(2021). COVID-19 Communication ecologies: Using interpersonal, organizational, and mediated communication resources to cope with a pandemic. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(7), 887–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221992837

28.

Huang

Liu

(2022). Promoting COVID-19 vaccination: The interplay of message framing, psychological uncertainty, and public agency as a message source. Science Communication, 44(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211048192

29.

Huijstee

D. V.

Vermeulen

Kerkhof

Droog

(2022). Continued influence of misinformation in times of COVID-19. International Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12805

30.

Klise

Beyeler

Finley

Makvandi

(2021). Analysis of mobility data to build contact networks for COVID-19. PLoS One, 16(4), e0249726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249726

31.

Kok

Peters

G. J. Y.

Kessels

L. T. E.

Ten Hoor

G. A.

Ruiter

R. A. C.

(2018). Ignoring theory and misinterpreting evidence: The false belief in fear appeals. Health Psychology Review, 12(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1415767

32.

Lake

Gerrans

Sheddon

Attwell

Botterill

L. C.

Lee

J. A.

(2021). We’re all in this together, but for different reasons: Social values and social actions that affect COVID-19 preventative behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, 110868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110868

33.

(2021). Fear of COVID-19: What causes fear and how individuals cope with it. Health Communication, 37(13), 1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1901423

34.

S-C. S.

Huang

L-M. S.

(2020). Fear appeals, information processing, and behavioral intentions toward climate change. Asian Journal of Communication, 30(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2020.1784967

35.

Link

Rosset

Fretag

(2021). Types of interpersonal and media-related communication and information behavior during the corona pandemic. In Sukalla

Voigt

(Eds.), Risks and potentials in health communication (pp. 21–30). SSOAR- GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.

36.

Maloney

E. K.

Lapinski

M. K.

Witte

(2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x

37.

Melki

Tamim

Hadid

Makki

El Amine

Hitti

(2021). Mitigating infodemics: The relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading. PLoS One, 16(6), e0252830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252830

38.

Moser

R. P.

Arndt

Han

P. K.

Waters

E. A.

Amsellem

Hesse

B. W.

(2014). Perceptions of cancer as a death sentence: Prevalence and consequences. Journal of Health Psychology, 19(12), 1518–1524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313494924

39.

Orji

(2016). Persuasion and culture: Individualism-collectivism and susceptibility to influence strategies. In Orji

Reisinger

Busch

Dijkstra

Stribe

Tscheligi’s

(Eds.), Proceedings of the Personalization in Persuasive Technology Workshop, Persuasive Technology, online.

40.

Overgaard

C. S. B.

(2021). Constructive journalism in the face of a crisis: The effects of social media news updates about COVID-19. Journalism Studies, 22(14), 1875–1893. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1971107

41.

Raeymaeckers

Van Puyvelde

(2021). Nonprofit advocacy coalitions in times of COVID-19: Brokerage, crowdfunding, and advocacy roles. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(6), 1304–1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764021991675

42.

Rashid

A. A.

Idris

M. I.

Zulkiflee

N. S.

Yahaya

A. Y.

Ramesh

(2021). The correlation of social media activity and engagement of a health NGO with the outcome of fundraising efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 20, 148–154.

43.

Reynolds-Tylus

(2019). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A review of the literature. Frontiers Communication, 4, 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056

44.

Richards

A. S.

Banas

J. A.

Magid

(2017). More on inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages: The paradox of threat. Health Communication, 32(7), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1196410

45.

Richards

A. S.

Qin

Daily

Nan

(2021). African American parents’ perceived vaccine efficacy moderates the effect of message framing on psychological reactance to HPV vaccine advocacy. Journal of Health Communication, 26(8), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1966688

46.

Rosenblatt

Greenberg

Solomon

Pyszczynski

Lyon

(1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 681–690.

47.

Samy

Abdelmalak

Ahmed

Kelada

(2020). Social media as a source of medical information during COVID-19. Medical Education Online, 25(1), 1791469. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1791467

48.

Scuotto

Llardi

C. R.

Avallone

Maggi

Llardi

Borrelli

Gamboz

La Marra

Perrella

(2021). Objective knowledge mediates the relationship between the use of social media and COVID-19-related false memories. Brain Science, 11(11), 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci1111489

49.

Sellner

Jenkins

T. M.

von Oertzen

T. J.

Bassetti

C. L.

Beghi

Bereczki

Bodini

Cavallieri

Di Liberto

Helbok

Macerollo

(2021). A plea for equitable global access to COVID-19 diagnostics, vaccination and therapy: The NeuroCOVID-19 Task Force of the European Academy of Neurology. European Journal of Neurology, 28(11), 3849–3855.

50.

Shen

(2015). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Communication, 30(10), 975–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.910882

51.

Singh

Lima

Cha

Kulshrestha

Ahn

Y-Y.

Varol

(2022). Misinformation, believability, and vaccine acceptance over 40 countries: Takeaways from the initial phase of the COVID-19 infodemic. PLoS One, 17(2), e0263381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263381.

52.

Skalacka

Pajestka

(2021). Digital or in-person: The relationship between mode of interpersonal communication during the COVID-19 pandemic and mental health in older adults from 27 countries. Journal of Family Nursing, 27(4), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407211031980

53.

Sleigh

Amann

Schneider

Vayena

(2021). Qualitative analysis of visual risk communication on twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 810. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10851-4

54.

Stolow

J. A.

Moses

L. M.

Lederer

A. M.

Carter

(2020). How fear appeal approaches in COVID-19 health communication may be harming the global community. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 531–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120935073

55.

McDonnell

Wen

Kozak

Abbas

Segalo

Ahmad

Cheshmehzangi

Cai

Yang

Ziang

Y-T.

(2021). Mental health consequences of COVID-19 media coverage: The need for effective crisis communication practices. Globalization and Health, 17(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00654-4

56.

Tang

Zou

(2021). Health information consumption under COVID-19 lockdown: An interview study of residents of Hubei Province, China. Health Communication, 36(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1847447

57.

Tully

Dalrymple

K. E.

Young

(2019). Contextualizing nonprofits’ use of links on Twitter during the West African Ebola virus epidemic. Communication Studies, 70(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1539021

58.

Van Huijstee

Vermeulen

Kerkhof

Droog

. (2022). Continued influence of misinformation in times of COVID-19. International Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12805

59.

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

(2021). Addressing COVID-19 misinformation on social media preemptively and responsively. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27(2), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.3201/EID2702.203139

60.

Wagner

Reifegerste

(2023). “The part played by people” in times of COVID-19: Interpersonal communication about media in a pandemic crisis. Health Communication, 38(5), 1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1989786

61.

Walker

(2020). Fauci says Trump’s refusal to wear a mask is due to belief it makes him look weak. Truthout. Retrieved from: https://truthout.org/articles/fauci-says-trumps-refusal-to-wear-mask-is-due-to-belief-it-makes-him-look-weak/

62.

Waeterloos

De Meulenaere

Walrave

Ponnet

(2021). Tackling COVID-19 from below: Civic participation among online neighbourhood network users during the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Information Review, 45(4), 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0379

63.

Witte

(1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276

64.

Wong

N. C. H.

Harvell

L. A.

Harrison

K. J.

(2013). The unintended target: Assessing nonsmokers’ reactions to gain- and loss-framed antismoking public service announcements. Journal of Health Communication, 18(12), 1402–1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.798376

65.

World Health Organization (2022). Infodemic. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1