Based on an ethnographic and mixed-methods research design, the article explores the social and interactive processes of disenfranchisement of perinatal grief through the mechanisms of silence, silencing and self-censorship in encounters between bereaved women and the social milieu. The analysis finds that disenfranchisement results from the constriction of the social space of bereavement along various lines of discourse, cultural values, practice and materiality, that include: the passing of time (expectations of a quick ‘recovery’); competing discourses of loss (simplistic-dominant vs. complex-subordinate meaning-making); the biometrics of pregnancy (lower gestational age being equated with less intense grief); gendered ideas of reproduction and feeling rules; asymmetries in social power; social spheres (hospital, home, community, support groups); socio-materialities and performance/ritual; and structural aspects of social and familial organization (gender, age, intergenerational and kin v. non-kin relations). These processes are intimately linked to the complication of grief by undermining support, meaning-making and continuing bonds.
BaradK. (2007). Barad meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
3.
BurkeL. A.NeimeyerR. A. (2013). Prospective risk factors for complicated grief. In StroebeM. S.SchutH. A. W., &. van den BoutJ. (Eds.), Complicated grief: Scientific foundations for health care professionals (pp. 145–161). Routledge.
4.
CassidyP. R. (2018). Care quality following intrauterine death in Spanish hospitals: Results from an online survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1630-z
CosgroveL. (2004). The aftermath of pregnancy loss: A feminist critique of the literature and implications for treatment. Women & Therapy, 27(3–4), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015v27n03_08
7.
CouplandN.CouplandJ. (1997). Discourses of the unsayable: Death-implicative talk in geriatric medical consultations. In JaworskiA.(Ed.), Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 117–152). Mouton de Gruyter.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
9.
DavisC. G. (2001). The tormented and the transformed: Understanding responses to loss and trauma. In NeimeyerR. A.(Ed.), Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss. American Psychiatric Association.
10.
De FinaA.GeorgakopoulouA. (2015). Introduction. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 1–18). Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
DokaK. J. (1989). Disenfranchised grief. In DokaK. J. (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow. Lexington Books.
12.
DyregrovK.DyregrovA. (2008). Effective grief and bereavement support: The role of family, friends, colleagues, schools, and support professionals. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
13.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. Pantheon Books.
FoxN. J.AlldredP. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.921458
16.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
17.
GoldK. J.LeonI.BoggsM. E.SenA. (2016). Depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after perinatal loss in a population-based sample. Journal of Women's Health, 25(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5284
18.
GoldK. J.SenA.LeonI. (2017). Whose fault is it anyway? Guilt, blame, and death attribution by mothers after stillbirth or infant death. Illness, Crisis & Loss. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054137317740800
HochschildA. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
21.
HollandJ. M.CurrierJ. M.NeimeyerR. A. (2006). Meaning reconstruction in the first two years of bereavement: The role of sense-making and benefit-finding. Omega – Journal of Death and Dying, 53(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.2190/FKM2-YJTY-F9VV-9XWY
International Theological Commission. (2009). The hope of salvation for infants who die without being baptised. In R. M. Sharkey & F. T. Weinandy (Eds.), International Theological Commission, Vol II: Texts and Documents, 1986-2007. Ignatius Press.
24.
JaworskiA. (1997). Introduction: An overview. In JaworskiA.(Ed.), Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter.
25.
KerstingA.DorschM.KreulichC.ReutemannM.OhrmannP.BaezE.AroltV. (2005). Trauma and grief 2–7 years after termination of pregnancy because of fetal anomalies – A pilot study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 26(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610400022967
26.
KlassD. (1997). The deceased child in the psychic and social worlds of bereaved parents during the resolution of grief. Death Studies, 21(2), 147–176.
27.
KlassD. (2001). Continuing bonds in the resolution of grief in Japan and North America. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(5), 742–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121956476
LobbE. A.KristjansonL. J.AounS. M.MonterossoL.HalkettG. K. B.DaviesA. (2010). Predictors of complicated grief: A systematic review of empirical studies. Death Studies, 34(8), 673–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2010.496686
NadeauJ. W. (2001). Family construction of meaning. In NeimeyerR. A.(Ed.), Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. American Psychological Association.
36.
NicholsJ. A. (1989). Perinatal death. In DokaK. J. (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow (pp. 117–126). Lexington Books.
37.
O’LearyJ. M.WarlandJ. (2013). Untold stories of infant loss: The importance of contact with the baby for bereaved parents. Journal of Family Nursing, 19(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840713495972
38.
OakleyA. (1998). Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology, 32(4), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038598032004005
39.
ParkesC. M.PrigersonH. G. (2009). Bereavement: Studies of grief in adult life (4th ed.). Routledge.
40.
PineV. R. (1989). Death, loss, and disenfranchised grief. In DokaK. J. (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow (pp. 13–23). Lexington Books.
41.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1994). Analyzing discourse. In BrymanA.BurgessR. G. (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 47–66). Routledge.
42.
RichesG.DawsonP. (1998a). Lost children, living memories: The role of photographs in processes of grief and adjustment among bereaved parent. Death Studies, 22(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811898201632
43.
RichesG.DawsonP. (1998b). Spoiled memories: Problems of grief resolution in families bereaved through murder. Mortality, 3(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/713685897
44.
RobsonP.WalterT. (2013). Hierarchies of loss: A critique of disenfranchised grief. OMEGA – Journal of Death and Dying, 66(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.66.2.a
45.
RosenblattP. C. (1993). Grief: The social context of private feelings. In StroebeM. S.StroebeW.HanssonR. O. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 102–111). Cambridge University Press.
46.
SobkowiakW. (1997). Silence and markedness theory. In JaworskiA.(Ed.), Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 39–61). Mouton de Gruyter.
47.
StroebeM. S.SchutH. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23(3), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811899201046
48.
StroebeM. S.SchutH. (2015). Family matters in bereavement: Toward an integrative intra-interpersonal coping model. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 10(6), 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598517
49.
ThiesmeyerL. (2003). Introduction: Silencing in discourse. In ThiesmeyerL.(Ed.), Discourse and silencing: Representation and the language of displacement (pp. 1–36). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
ValentineC.BauldL.WalterT. (2016). Bereavement following substance misuse. OMEGA – Journal of Death and Dying, 72(4), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222815625174
WhiteD. L.WalkerA. J.RichardsL. N. (2008). Intergenerational family support following infant death. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 67(3), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.67.3.a
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
